Highly dynamic fission–fusion species can exhibit leadership when traveling

Leadership by specific individuals is thought to enhance the fitness of followers by allowing them to take advantage of the knowledge or skills of key individuals. In general, consistent leadership is expected to occur primarily in stable groups of related individuals where the benefits enhance the inclusive fitness of a leader. Societies with less stability in group composition (i.e., fission–fusion groups) are less likely to feature unshared decision making. However, in situations where frequent interactions among individuals occur (e.g., small population size and small range of movement) and/or the complexity of the environment requires substantial experience and knowledge, consistent leadership might be expected. We tested if a highly dynamic fission–fusion population of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus), inhabiting a complex environment, exhibited leadership when traveling. A small number of specific individuals led group travel more often than expected by chance, and were more likely to initiate successful direction changes of groups than following individuals. The number of leaders in a group remained relatively constant across a wide range of group sizes and was not affected by the number of potential leaders (i.e., those that had led previously) present in the group. Together, these results suggest that leadership can occur in species with high rates of group fission and fusion. Therefore, the loss of key individuals could have disproportionate effects on population dynamics.

[1]  O. Rasa,et al.  The Dwarf Mongoose: A Study of Behavior and Social Structure in Relation to Ecology in a Small, Social Carnivore , 1987 .

[2]  E. Erhart,et al.  Does female dominance facilitate feeding priority in black‐and‐white ruffed lemurs (Varecia variegata) in southeastern Madagascar? , 2005, American journal of primatology.

[3]  Ilya R. Fischhoff,et al.  Social relationships and reproductive state influence leadership roles in movements of plains zebra, Equus burchellii , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  C. Boesch,et al.  Female white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) lead group movements and have priority of access to food resources , 2008 .

[5]  Bernd Würsig,et al.  The Photographic Determination of Group Size, Composition, and Stability of Coastal Porpoises (Tursiops truncatus) , 1977 .

[6]  R. R. Krausz Living in Groups , 2013 .

[7]  L. Conradt,et al.  Consensus decision making in animals. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  I. Couzin,et al.  “Leading According to Need” in Self‐Organizing Groups , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[9]  L. Mech,et al.  Leadership behavior in relation to dominance and reproductive status in gray wolves, Canis lupus , 2002 .

[10]  S. G. Reebs Can a minority of informed leaders determine the foraging movements of a fish shoal? , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  S. Durant,et al.  Matriarchs As Repositories of Social Knowledge in African Elephants , 2001, Science.

[12]  K. Payne Sources of social complexity in the three elephant species. , 2003 .

[13]  O. Petit,et al.  The influence of social organisation on leadership in brown lemurs (Eulemur fulvus fulvus) in a controlled environment , 2008, Behavioural Processes.

[14]  J. Mann,et al.  The effects of aquaculture on bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops sp.) ranging in Shark Bay, Western Australia , 2005 .

[15]  Lawrence M. Dill,et al.  FOOD AVAILABILITY AND TIGER SHARK PREDATION RISK INFLUENCE BOTTLENOSE DOLPHIN HABITAT USE , 2002 .

[16]  Luis E. Levin,et al.  Passage order through different pathways in groups of schooling fish, and the diversified leadership hypothesis , 1996, Behavioural Processes.

[17]  J. Kucklick,et al.  Fine-scale spatial variation of persistent organic pollutants in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Biscayne Bay, Florida. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  B. Manly Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology , 2018 .

[19]  E. Erhart,et al.  Female Coordination of Group Travel in Wild Propithecus and Eulemur , 1999, International Journal of Primatology.

[20]  R. Dymock Origins and Evolution , 2010 .

[21]  C. Janson,et al.  Social foraging and the finder's share in capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  D. Zinner,et al.  To follow or not to follow: decision making and leadership during the morning departure in chacma baboons , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  I. Couzin,et al.  Consensus decision making in human crowds , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  Andrew J. King,et al.  Dominance and Affiliation Mediate Despotism in a Social Primate , 2008, Current Biology.

[25]  W. M. Swingle,et al.  LOCAL ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF BOTTLENOSE DOLPHINS (TURSIOPS TRUNCATUS) IN THE NEARSHORE WATERS OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA , 1999 .

[26]  W. W. Daniel,et al.  Applied Nonparametric Statistics , 1978 .

[27]  Paul Reeves,et al.  Positioning Behaviour in Roach Shoals: The Role of Body Length and Nutritional State , 1998 .

[28]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[29]  D. Weller,et al.  OCCURRENCE, DISTRIBUTION, SITE FIDELITY, AND SCHOOL SIZE OF BOTTLENOSE DOLPHINS (TURSIOPS TRUNCATUS) OFF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA , 1999 .

[30]  Marek Špinka,et al.  Synchronization and leadership in switches between resting and activity in a beef cattle herd—A case study , 2007 .

[31]  Andrew Sih,et al.  The mix matters: behavioural types and group dynamics in water striders , 2005 .

[32]  J. Altmann,et al.  Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. , 1974, Behaviour.

[33]  David Lusseau,et al.  The emergence of unshared consensus decisions in bottlenose dolphins , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[34]  Dominic D. P. Johnson,et al.  The Origins and Evolution of Leadership , 2009, Current Biology.

[35]  C. J. Wood,et al.  Movement of bottlenose dolphins around the south‐west coast of Britain , 1998 .

[36]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[37]  R. Connor,et al.  Two levels of alliance formation among male bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.). , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  R. Connor,et al.  Complex social structure, alliance stability and mating access in a bottlenose dolphin ‘super-alliance’ , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  A. Solow,et al.  SHORT-TERM EFFECTS OF BOAT TRAFFIC ON BOTTLENOSE DOLPHINS, TURSIOPS TRUNCATUS, IN SARASOTA BAY, FLORIDA , 2001 .

[40]  S. Shane 12 – Behavior and Ecology of the Bottlenose Dolphin at Sanibel Island, Florida , 1990 .

[41]  T. Caraco,et al.  Social foraging: Producing and scrounging in a stochastic environment* , 1991 .