Remotely Triggered Release from Magnetic Nanoparticles

Multivalent nanoparticles have tremendous potential in the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Their multivalency allows simultaneous conjugation of targeting ligands to improve nanoparticle homing, polymers (e.g., polyethylene glycol (PEG)) to improve nanoparticle pharmacokinetics, as well as therapeutic drug cargo. Drug release from a nanoparticle surface has been accomplished by bonds that are sensitive to hydrolytic degradation or pH; however, complex release profiles that can be controlled from large distances (>10 cm) have not been achieved. Here, we describe a multifunctional nanoparticle that is: (1) multivalent, (2) remotelyactuated, and (3) imaged non-invasively by magnetic resonance imaging. Superparamagnetic nanoparticles act as transducers to capture external electromagnetic energy at 350– 400 kHz, which is not significantly absorbed by tissue, to disrupt hydrogen bonding between complementary oligonucleotides on demand. With a nucleic acid strand covalently linked to the nanoparticle, dye-labeled single stranded DNA (a model antisense therapeutic) self-assembles on the particle’s surface, forming a tunable, heat-labile linker. The multifunctional nanoparticles are used to demonstrate remote, pulsatile release of a single species and multistage release of two species in vitro, as well as noninvasive imaging and remote actuation upon implantation in vivo. Release from surfaces or polymers triggered by an external stimulus (electric current, magnetic fields, temperature, light, ultrasound) has been extensively studied (reviewed in). These strategies, however, have been principally applied to macroand micro-scale materials and drug reservoirs. For focal diseases, such as cancer, these devices must be implanted at the tumor site (e.g., Gliadel). Another approach is to replace these larger depots with drug-carrying nanoparticles that can be individually targeted to the tumor. Heat and light-sensitive liposomes, for example, can be delivered systemically and their contents released in response to an external stimulus. Our strategy has the added advantage of radiofrequency electromagnetic field (EMF) activation, which improves penetration depth over heat or light (at 400 kHz, field penetration into 15 cm of tissue is > 99 %). Similarly, energy absorption, and thus background heating, of water and tissue is insignificant in the 350–400 kHz frequency regime. In contrast, when applied to magnetic materials, these fields produce heat as the magnetic dipole of the material aligns with the external field. We conjugated a 30 bp DNA to dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles and added a complement of 12, 18, or 24 bp linked to a model drug, a fluorophore. Excess fluorescent DNA was removed by trapping the particle on a magnetic column and washing with buffer. Particles were trapped in a matrigel plug as an in vitro model of tumor tissue, allowing fluorescent DNA to diffuse out into the surrounding buffer only when liberated from the particles. In Figure 1B we demonstrate pulsatile release of a fluorophore initiated by EMF pulses (400 kHz, 1.25 kW) of 5 min duration every 40 min. The fluorescence of the surrounding buffer increased markedly in the sampling immediately after EMF application, followed by a fluorescence decrease in subsequent samplings. Because much of the fluorescent DNA rehybridized to the particles upon cooling of the plug to room temperature, subsequent EMF application allowed further release. Such a profile would be useful for metronomic dosing of a cytotoxic drug. The use of a nucleic acid duplex as a heat-labile linker adds the additional feature of temperature tunability through changes in chain length and variations in G/C content. Using a variable-gain RF amplifier to control particle heating, biomolecules tethered to these oligonucleotides can be released in multiple stages. In Figure 1C we use oligonucleotides of two different lengths and corresponding fluorescent species (12 bp, FAM; 24 bp, HEX) to demonstrate the potential for complex release profiles. Low power EMF pulses (0.55 kW) triggered release predominantly of FAM by melting of the C O M M U N IC A TI O N

[1]  You Han Bae,et al.  Thermosensitive sol-gel reversible hydrogels. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[2]  Roger C. Jones,et al.  Magnetic Induction Heating of Ferromagnetic Implants for Inducing Localized Hyperthermia in Deep-Seated Tumors , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Miqin Zhang,et al.  Methotrexate-modified superparamagnetic nanoparticles and their intracellular uptake into human cancer cells. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[4]  Shiladitya Sengupta,et al.  Temporal targeting of tumour cells and neovasculature with a nanoscale delivery system , 2005, Nature.

[5]  J. Kost,et al.  Ultrasound-enhanced polymer degradation and release of incorporated substances. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Ingrid Hilger,et al.  Thermal Ablation of Tumors Using Magnetic Nanoparticles: An In Vivo Feasibility Study , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[7]  M. Cima,et al.  A controlled-release microchip , 1999, Nature.

[8]  Yiqing Shen,et al.  Configurational diffusion down a folding funnel describes the dynamics of DNA hairpins , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  M. Dewhirst,et al.  The development and testing of a new temperature-sensitive drug delivery system for the treatment of solid tumors. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[10]  R Langer,et al.  Microchips as Controlled Drug-Delivery Devices. , 2000, Angewandte Chemie.

[11]  Elazer R. Edelman,et al.  Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. , 1997 .

[12]  E. Edelman,et al.  Regulation of drug release from polymer matrices by oscillating magnetic fields. , 1985, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[13]  M. Ferrari Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[14]  Y Rabin,et al.  Is intracellular hyperthermia superior to extracellular hyperthermia in the thermal sense? , 2002, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[15]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Physical limits of hyperthermia using magnetite fine particles , 1998 .

[16]  W John,et al.  Inductive heating of ferrimagnetic particles and magnetic fluids: Physical evaluation of their potential for hyperthermia , 2009, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[17]  V. Torchilin,et al.  Biodegradable long-circulating polymeric nanospheres. , 1994, Science.

[18]  Gabriele Bergers,et al.  Less is more, regularly: metronomic dosing of cytotoxic drugs can target tumor angiogenesis in mice. , 2000, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[19]  Ivan A. Brezovich,et al.  Frequency/depth-penetration considerations in hyperthermia by magnetically induced currents , 1980 .

[20]  George C Schatz,et al.  What controls the melting properties of DNA-linked gold nanoparticle assemblies? , 2000, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[21]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[22]  Erkki Ruoslahti,et al.  Nanocrystal targeting in vivo , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Peter Wust,et al.  Description and characterization of the novel hyperthermia- and thermoablation-system MFH 300F for clinical magnetic fluid hyperthermia. , 2004, Medical physics.

[24]  Y. Bae,et al.  Electrically credible polymer gel for controlled release of drugs , 1991, Nature.

[25]  H. Dai,et al.  Carbon nanotubes as multifunctional biological transporters and near-infrared agents for selective cancer cell destruction. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  R. Stafford,et al.  Nanoshell-mediated near-infrared thermal therapy of tumors under magnetic resonance guidance , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Ashutosh Chilkoti,et al.  Targeted drug delivery by thermally responsive polymers. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[28]  David H. Thompson,et al.  Phototriggering of liposomal drug delivery systems. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[29]  E. Mathiowitz,et al.  Polyamide microcapsules for controlled release. V. Photochemical release , 1989 .