Behavioral and Neural Trajectories of Risk Taking for Peer and Parent in Adolescence

Abstract One feature of adolescence is a rise in risk-taking behaviors, whereby the consequences of adolescents' risky action often impact their immediate surrounding such as their peers and parents (vicarious risk taking). Yet, little is known about how vicarious risk taking develops, particularly depending on who the risk affects and the type of risky behavior. In a 3-wave longitudinal fMRI study, 173 adolescents completed 1–3 years of a risky decision-making task where they took risks to win money for their best friend and parent (n with behavioral and fMRI data ranges from 139–144 and 100–116 participants, respectively, per wave). Results of this preregistered study suggest that adolescents did not differentially take adaptive (sensitivity to the expected value of reward during risk taking) and general (decision-making when the expected values of risk taking and staying safe are equivalent) risks for their best friend and parent from sixth to ninth grade. At the neural level, preregistered ROI analyses revealed no differences in the ventral striatum and ventromedial pFC during general nor adaptive risk taking for best friend versus parent over time. Furthermore, exploratory longitudinal whole-brain analyses revealed subthreshold differences between best friend and parent trajectories within regulatory regions during general vicarious risk taking and social-cognitive regions during adaptive vicarious risk taking. Our findings demonstrate that brain regions implicated in cognitive control and social-cognitive processes may distinguish behaviors involving peers and parents over time.

[1]  K. Zanolie,et al.  Growing in generosity? The effects of giving magnitude, target, and audience on the neural signature of giving in adolescence , 2022, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Eva H. Telzer,et al.  Age‐related change in task‐evoked amygdala—prefrontal circuitry: A multiverse approach with an accelerated longitudinal cohort aged 4–22 years , 2021, bioRxiv.

[3]  Eva H. Telzer,et al.  Self-oriented neural circuitry predicts other-oriented adaptive risks in adolescence: a longitudinal study , 2021, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[4]  E. Forbes,et al.  The longitudinal stability of fMRI activation during reward processing in adolescents and young adults , 2020, NeuroImage.

[5]  M. Luciana,et al.  The longitudinal association between externalizing behavior and frontoamygdalar resting‐state functional connectivity in late adolescence and young adulthood , 2020, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[6]  B. King-Casas,et al.  Developmental Changes in Emotion Regulation during Adolescence: Associations with Socioeconomic Risk and Family Emotional Context , 2020, Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

[7]  P. Kuppens,et al.  On the Use of Empirical Bayes Estimates as Measures of Individual Traits , 2019, Assessment.

[8]  João F. Guassi Moreira,et al.  Is social decision making for close others consistent across domains and within individuals? , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  L. Somerville,et al.  Asymmetric neural tracking of gain and loss magnitude during adolescence , 2018, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[10]  João F. Guassi Moreira,et al.  Family conflict shapes how adolescents take risks when their family is affected. , 2018, Developmental science.

[11]  E. Telzer,et al.  Social Influence on Positive Youth Development: A Developmental Neuroscience Perspective. , 2018, Advances in child development and behavior.

[12]  Barbara R Braams,et al.  Longitudinal Changes in Social Brain Development: Processing Outcomes for Friend and Self. , 2017, Child development.

[13]  H. Schielzeth,et al.  The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded , 2016, bioRxiv.

[14]  Eva H. Telzer,et al.  But is helping you worth the risk? Defining Prosocial Risk Taking in adolescence , 2016, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Eveline A. Crone,et al.  Peers and parents: a comparison between neural activation when winning for friends and mothers in adolescence , 2016, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[16]  Eva H. Telzer,et al.  Letting the good times roll: adolescence as a period of reduced inhibition to appetitive social cues. , 2016, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[17]  E. Nelson,et al.  Social re-orientation and brain development: An expanded and updated view , 2015, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  W. Furman,et al.  Friendships, Romantic Relationships, and Peer Relationships , 2015 .

[19]  Eva H. Telzer,et al.  Mothers know best: redirecting adolescent reward sensitivity toward safe behavior during risk taking. , 2015, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[20]  M. Delgado,et al.  Neural Correlates of Expected Risks and Returns in Risky Choice across Development , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  M. Lamb,et al.  Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Socioemotional processes, Vol. 3, 7th ed. , 2015 .

[22]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[23]  L. Somerville,et al.  Adolescent-specific patterns of behavior and neural activity during social reinforcement learning , 2014, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[24]  A. Galván,et al.  Neural representation of expected value in the adolescent brain , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Joseph W. Kable,et al.  The valuation system: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value , 2013, NeuroImage.

[26]  A. D'Argembeau.  On the Role of the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex in Self-Processing: The Valuation Hypothesis , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[27]  Jennifer C. Britton,et al.  Linear mixed-effects modeling approach to FMRI group analysis , 2013, NeuroImage.

[28]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[29]  C. Mann,et al.  A Practical Treatise on Diseases of the Skin , 1889, Atlanta Medical and Surgical Journal (1884).

[30]  David J. Paulsen,et al.  Decision-Making Under Risk in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[31]  A. Wagner,et al.  Cognitive control and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex: reflexive reorienting, motor inhibition, and action updating , 2011, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[32]  L. Steinberg,et al.  Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain's reward circuitry. , 2011, Developmental science.

[33]  E. Rolls,et al.  Value, Pleasure and Choice in the Ventral Prefrontal Cortex , 2022 .

[34]  V. Stuphorn,et al.  Supplementary Motor Area Exerts Proactive and Reactive Control of Arm Movements , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  James D. Larson,et al.  Peer relationships in adolescence. , 2009 .

[36]  Carrie L. Masten,et al.  Neural correlates of social exclusion during adolescence: understanding the distress of peer rejection. , 2009, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[37]  E. Crone,et al.  Developmental changes and individual differences in risk and perspective taking in adolescence , 2008, Development and Psychopathology.

[38]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[39]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  Automatic independent component labeling for artifact removal in fMRI , 2008, NeuroImage.

[40]  I. Levin,et al.  Stability of choices in a risky decision-making task: a 3-year longitudinal study with children and adults , 2007 .

[41]  M. Delgado,et al.  Reward‐Related Responses in the Human Striatum , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[42]  M. Ernst,et al.  Neural substrates of choice selection in adults and adolescents: Development of the ventrolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Neural Representations of Self versus Other: Visual-Spatial Perspective Taking and Agency in a Virtual Ball-tossing Game , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  E. Leibenluft,et al.  The social re-orientation of adolescence: a neuroscience perspective on the process and its relation to psychopathology , 2005, Psychological Medicine.

[45]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Risk preferences in young children: early evidence of individual differences in reaction to potential gains and losses , 2003 .

[46]  A. Roux,et al.  A glossary for multilevel analysis , 2002, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[47]  L. O'donnell,et al.  Early sexual initiation and subsequent sex-related risks among urban minority youth: the reach for health study. , 2001, Family planning perspectives.

[48]  C. Jack,et al.  Prospective multiaxial motion correction for fMRI , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[49]  B. Psaty,et al.  School-level application of a social bonding model to adolescent risk-taking behavior. , 1995, The Journal of school health.

[50]  W. Schultz,et al.  Neuronal activity in monkey ventral striatum related to the expectation of reward , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[51]  J. Wilks.  The relative importance of parents and friends in adolescent decision making , 1986, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[52]  Clark C. Presson,et al.  Changes in peer and parent influence during adolescence: Longitudinal versus cross-sectional perspectives on smoking initiation. , 1986 .

[53]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Transitions in social influence at adolescence: Who induces cigarette smoking? , 1982 .

[54]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .