Apprentice or Student? The Structures of Construction Industry Vocational Education and Training in Denmark and Sweden and their Possible Consequences for Safety Learning

There is a notable difference in occupational injury rates in the two Scandinavian countries, Sweden and Denmark, with the latter having a 40% higher rate of fatal occupational injuries in the construction industry. This study explored differences in the vocational education and training (VET) systems between Sweden and Denmark that may be important for students’ safety learning and practice during VET. In both countries, students participate in full-time education, and the curriculum includes school-based as well as company- based training. However, during company- based training Swedish students retain their student status, whereas Danish students are employed as apprentices. From a perspective of viewing safety as a social practice developed through interactions of different social and institutional bodies, the analysis points to this difference in employment status as important for their safety practices and also for the teachers’ position to influence safety learning and practices during company-based training. An analysis of interview and survey data focusing on how VET students enact safety ‘knowings’ across learning sites, suggest how different forms of connectivity models in VET promote various forms of safety learning among students.

[1]  Mette Lykke Nielsen.  Adapting ‘The Normal’ – Examining Relations between Youth, Risk and Accidents at Work , 2012 .

[2]  Kristinn Tómasson,et al.  Fatal occupational accidents in the Nordic countries 2003 - 2008 , 2011 .

[3]  Christian Helms Jørgensen,et al.  Challenges for the dual system and occupational self-governance in Denmark , 2011 .

[4]  David Guile,et al.  Learning Through Work Experience , 2001 .

[5]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[6]  C. Jørgensen,et al.  Challenges for work-based learning in vocational education and training in the Nordic Countries , 2015 .

[7]  Marius R. Busemeyer,et al.  Partisan power, economic coordination and variations in vocational training systems in Europe , 2014 .

[8]  A. Hale,et al.  Working to rule, or working safely? Part 1: A state of the art review , 2013 .

[9]  Silvia Gherardi,et al.  Community of Practice or Practices of a Community , 2009 .

[10]  Boel Berner,et al.  Crossing boundaries and maintaining differences between school and industry: forms of boundary‐work in Swedish vocational education , 2010 .

[11]  Margaret J. Somerville,et al.  Subjected Bodies, or Embodied Subjects: Subjectivity and Learning Safety at Work , 2007 .

[12]  Alison Fuller,et al.  Fostering Workplace Learning: Looking through the Lens of Apprenticeship , 2003 .

[13]  Päivi Tynjälä,et al.  Connectivity and Transformation in Work-Related Learning – Theoretical Foundations , 2009 .

[14]  H. Schaap,et al.  Students’ Learning Processes during School-Based Learning and Workplace Learning in Vocational Education: A Review , 2011, Vocations and Learning.

[15]  Alison Taylor,et al.  ‘Made in the trade’: youth attitudes toward apprenticeship certification , 2011 .

[16]  Alison Fuller,et al.  Contemporary Apprenticeship: International Perspectives on an Evolving Model of Learning , 2014 .

[17]  Stephen Richard Billett,et al.  Subjectivity, Learning and Work: Sources and Legacies , 2008 .

[18]  N. Norris,et al.  Error, bias and validity in qualitative research , 1997 .

[19]  P. Hodkinson,et al.  Understanding Learning Culturally: Overcoming the Dualism Between Social and Individual Views of Learning , 2008 .

[20]  Alison Fuller,et al.  Introduction: International Perspectives on Apprenticeship , 2014 .

[21]  Päivi Tynjälä,et al.  Towards Integration of Work and Learning , 2009 .

[22]  A. Bryman.  Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[23]  David Guile,et al.  A Connective Model of Learning: The Implications for Work Process Knowledge , 2003 .

[24]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[25]  Loek Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Apprenticeship: from learning theory to practice , 2011 .

[26]  Helen R. Winefield,et al.  The role of high schools in introductory occupational safety education - Teacher perspectives on effectiveness , 2013 .

[27]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning , 2006 .

[28]  Jakob Ditlev Bøje,et al.  Learning to stay in school: Selection, retention and identity processes in a Danish vocational educational training programme of basic health and care , 2014 .

[29]  Päivi Tynjälä,et al.  Educating Novices At The Workplace: Transformation Of Conceptions And Skills Of Students On A Metal Industry Course , 2009 .

[30]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1998 .

[31]  Päivi Tynjälä,et al.  Toward a 3-P Model of Workplace Learning: a Literature Review , 2013 .

[32]  Vibe Aarkrog.  A Taxonomy for Teaching Transfer Skills in the Danish VET System , 2011 .

[33]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  What Do You Mean By Safety? Conflicting Perspectives on Accident Causation and Safety Management in a Construction Firm , 1998 .

[34]  Corinne Bieder,et al.  Trapping Safety into Rules: How Desirable or Avoidable is Proceduralization? , 2013 .

[35]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Learning the Trade: A Culture of Safety in Practice , 2002 .

[36]  Regine Grytnes,et al.  A Sense of Security: Carpentry Apprentices Handling Uncertain and Dangerous Work Tasks , 2018 .

[37]  Aimée Hoeve,et al.  A Design Perspective on the School-Work Boundary: A Hybrid Curriculum Model , 2016 .

[38]  Selena Chan,et al.  Learning Through Apprenticeship: Belonging to a Workplace, Becoming and Being , 2013 .

[39]  A. Venema,et al.  Health and safety at work in Europe (1999-2007). A statistical portrait , 2010 .

[40]  A. Bakker,et al.  Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects , 2011 .

[41]  Marianne Törner,et al.  Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire (NOSACQ-50): A new tool for diagnosing occupational safety climate , 2011 .

[42]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Toward a Social Understanding of How People Learn in Organizations , 1998 .

[43]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[44]  Jakob Ditlev Bøje,et al.  Learning to stay in school , 2014 .

[45]  Lars Jensen,et al.  Factors contributing to the differences in work related injury rates between Danish and Swedish construction workers , 2003 .

[46]  A. Bryman.  Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? , 2006 .

[47]  Lene Tanggaard.  An exploration of students’ own explanations about dropout in vocational education in a Danish context , 2013 .