Digital Differentiation in Young People's Internet Use - Eliminating or Reproducing Disability Stereotypes

Norwegian authorities’ policy aims at securing an information society for all, emphasizing the importance of accessible and usable Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for everyone. While the body of research on young people’s use of ICT is quite comprehensive, research addressing digital differentiation in young people with disabilities’ use of ICT is still in its early days. This article investigates how young people with disabilities’ use, or non-use, of assistive ICT creates digital differentiations. The investigation elaborates on how the anticipations and stereotypes of disability establish an authoritative definition of assistive ICT, and the consequence this creates for the use of the Web by young people with disabilities. The object of the article is to provide enhanced insight into the field of technology and disability by illuminating how assistive ICT sometimes eliminates and sometimes reproduces stereotypes and digital differentiations. The investigation draws on a qualitative interview study with 23 young Norwegians with disabilities, aged 15–20 years. I draw on a theoretical perspective to analyze the findings of the study, which employs the concept of identity multiplicity. The article’s closing discussion expands on technology’s significance in young people’s negotiations of impairment and of perceptions of disability.

[1]  C. Campbell,et al.  On Being There , 1965 .

[2]  Pekka Räsänen,et al.  LINKED OR DIVIDED BY THE WEB?: Internet use and sociability in four European countries , 2007 .

[3]  Nick Watson,et al.  Well, I Know this is Going to Sound Very Strange to You, but I Don't See Myself as a Disabled Person: Identity and disability , 2002 .

[4]  S. Holloway,et al.  Cyberkids? Exploring Children’s Identities and Social Networks in On-line and Off-line Worlds , 2002 .

[5]  D. Lupton,et al.  Holding the line online: exploring wired relationships for people with disabilities , 2004 .

[6]  B. Weiner,et al.  The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[7]  E. Goffman Stigma; Notes On The Management Of Spoiled Identity , 1964 .

[8]  C. Hocking Having and using objects in the western world , 2000 .

[9]  Karin Barron,et al.  I am and I am not:identity, a multifaceted concept and social phenomenon , 2005 .

[10]  Sylvia Söderström,et al.  The use and non‐use of assistive technologies from the world of information and communication technology by visually impaired young people: a walk on the tightrope of peer inclusion , 2010 .

[11]  Sandra Smith,et al.  They only see it when the sun shines in my ears: exploring perceptions of adolescent hearing aid users. , 2006, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[12]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide , 2007, New Media Soc..

[13]  N. Baym Interpersonal Life Online , 2002 .

[14]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Beyond Hearing : Where Real-World and Online Support Meet , 2002 .

[15]  Sinikka Sassi,et al.  Cultural differentiation or social segregation? Four approaches to the digital divide , 2005, New Media Soc..

[16]  R N Lisa Skär Peer and adult relationships of adolescents with disabilities. , 2003, Journal of adolescence.

[17]  Margaret Morrison,et al.  Coming of age with the internet , 2006, New Media Soc..

[18]  P. Emiliani Assistive Technology (AT) versus Mainstream Technology (MST): The research perspective , 2006 .

[19]  Liangzhi Yu,et al.  Understanding information inequality : Making sense of the literature of the information and digital , 2006 .

[20]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[21]  Wendy Seymour,et al.  ICTs and disability: Exploring the human dimensions of technological engagement , 2006 .

[22]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Children's Use of the Internet: Reflections on the Emerging Research Agenda , 2003, New Media Soc..

[23]  Jenny Strong,et al.  Factors that predict the post-discharge use of recommended assistive technology (AT) , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[24]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Research Note: Individual Differences in Perceptions of Internet Communication , 2006 .

[25]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Beyond hearing: Where the real-world and online support meet. , 2002 .

[26]  Shanker Nesathurai,et al.  The impact of Internet access for people with spinal cord injuries: a descriptive analysis of a pilot study , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[27]  Bodil Ravneberg,et al.  Identity politics by design: users, markets and the public service provision for assistive technology in Norway , 2009 .

[28]  E. Hargittai,et al.  The disability divide in internet access and use , 2006 .

[29]  D. Lupton,et al.  Technology, selfhood and physical disability. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[30]  Y. Chapman,et al.  Grounded theory: a methodological spiral from positivism to postmodernism. , 2007, Journal of advanced nursing.

[31]  John Domingue,et al.  The Future of the Internet , 1999, Academia Letters.

[32]  Petter Bae Brandtzæg,et al.  In the borderland between family orientation and peer culture: the use of communication technologies among Norwegian tweens , 2007, New Media Soc..

[33]  S. Söderström The significance of ICT in disabled youth's identity negotiations , 2009 .

[34]  James A Lenker,et al.  Conceptualization and measurement of assistive technology usability , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[35]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Introduction to the updated student edition , 2006 .

[36]  David Buckingham,et al.  Children and New Media , 2006 .

[37]  K. Paterson,et al.  Nothing to be had ‘off the peg’: consumption, identity and the immobilization of young disabled people , 2005 .