A pseudo-3D ball lattice artifact and method for evaluating the metrological performance of structured-light 3D scanners

Abstract This paper presents a novel reference artifact and procedure for assessing the metrological performance of structured-light 3D scanners, also known as fringe projection systems. Despite the increasing popularity of these scanners, there is still no international standard aiming at providing a guideline for how to evaluate their metrological performance. The users of the scanners, especially for part inspection, need instructions for comparing the accuracy of different systems in measuring specific parameters, as well as acceptance tests to verify whether a particular scanner can be used to inspect the part in question. As the structured-light scanners are area-scanning systems, they necessitate testing over their entire measurement volume. In order to enable this, we propose a method based on a pseudo-3D artifact calibrated by a contact probe on a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). The proposed artifact consists of a 2D ball plate that is mounted on top of spacers of different heights using kinematic couplings that ensure repeatable positioning of the ball plate with respect to the base in order to create a 3D lattice once measured. The artifact provides reference values for the distance between the centers of any pair of precision balls, as well as the reference for size and form, in order to benchmark the scanner measurements. Using the reference data, the proposed procedure enables acceptance tests and a comprehensive insight into the errors of the scanner in measuring distance, size, and form at different positions within its entire scanning volume.

[1]  Song Zhang,et al.  High-speed 3D shape measurement with structured light methods: A review , 2018, Optics and Lasers in Engineering.

[2]  Alexander H. Slocum,et al.  Kinematic couplings: A review of design principles and applications , 2010 .

[3]  A. Kung,et al.  A Measuring Artefact for true 3D Machine Testing and Calibration , 2005 .

[4]  Michael H. Kutner Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[5]  E. Cuesta,et al.  New procedure for qualification of structured light 3D scanners using an optical feature-based gauge , 2018, Optics and Lasers in Engineering.

[6]  Farbod Khameneifar,et al.  Section-specific geometric error evaluation of airfoil blades based on digitized surface data , 2015 .

[7]  Michael McCarthy,et al.  Standards for testing freeform measurement capability of optical and tactile coordinate measuring machines , 2012 .

[8]  Sai Siva Gorthi,et al.  Fringe projection techniques: Whither we are? , 2010 .

[9]  J.-Angelo Beraldin,et al.  GD&T-Based Characterization of Short-Range Non-contact 3D Imaging Systems , 2013, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[10]  Sam Van der Jeught,et al.  Real-time structured light profilometry: a review , 2016 .

[11]  Song Zhang,et al.  Handbook of 3D Machine Vision: Optical Metrology and Imaging , 2013 .

[12]  Paolo Minetola,et al.  Proposal of an innovative benchmark for comparison of the performance of contactless digitizers , 2010 .

[13]  Gianfranco Genta,et al.  Calibration procedure for a laser triangulation scanner with uncertainty evaluation , 2016 .

[14]  Jakob Wilm,et al.  PRECISION AND ACCURACY PARAMETERS IN STRUCTURED LIGHT 3-D SCANNING , 2016 .

[15]  H. Kunzmann,et al.  Results of the international comparison of ball plate measurements in CIRP and WECC , 1995 .

[16]  Thomas Luhmann,et al.  RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AN ACCEPTANCE AND VERIFICATION TEST OF OPTICAL 3-D MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[17]  Ken Chen,et al.  Easy-to-operate calibration method for structured light systems. , 2016, Applied optics.

[18]  R K Leach,et al.  Invited Review Article: Review of post-process optical form metrology for industrial-grade metal additive manufactured parts. , 2016, The Review of scientific instruments.

[19]  Dung A. Nguyen,et al.  Some practical considerations in fringe projection profilometry , 2010 .

[20]  Stephen B. Brown,et al.  NPL freeform artefact for verification of non-contact measuring systems , 2011, Electronic Imaging.