Combining interface core and whole interface descriptors in postscan processing of protein‐protein docking models

Computational protein‐protein docking scans commonly produce correct and nearly correct interaction models, but sometimes these models are ranked low. We present here postscan processing procedures that dramatically enhance the distinction between nearly correct and false predictions. The procedures employ propensity descriptors calculated for the interface core, an interface‐core clusters count, solvation energy, and a geometric‐electrostatic‐hydrophobic complementarity score. The various descriptors rank high different selections of false models (shuffling effect), and therefore, are used as Boolean yes/no classifiers in “soft intersection” filters, which eliminate large proportions of false models. Furthermore, the standardized descriptors are used in new scoring functions that highlight nearly correct models (NCMs). All the tests are performed on unbound docking models produced with MolFit without use of external data. We find that the discrimination between nearly correct and false models by the various descriptors is class dependent; hence, our postscan processing is class specific. The filters reduce the number of putative models from 10,726, 12,517, and 11,054 to 758, 157, and 1218 for enzyme‐inhibitor, antibody‐antigen, and nonclassified systems. When combined with the new scoring functions, they improve the average rank of the highest ranking NCMs from 673 to 122. Application to 23 CAPRI targets demonstrates the effectiveness of the postscan procedures in cases where external information is used in the production of the putative models. Our new per‐molecule residue propensity descriptors show that interacting interfaces are enriched with high propensity residues except for antigenic sites, which resemble more the noninteracting regions of protein surfaces. Proteins 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  J. Janin,et al.  A dissection of specific and non-specific protein-protein interfaces. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  J. Janin,et al.  Protein-protein recognition. , 1995, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[3]  R M Jackson,et al.  Comparison of protein–protein interactions in serine protease‐inhibitor and antibody‐antigen complexes: Implications for the protein docking problem , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[4]  L. Krippahl,et al.  BiGGER: A new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions , 2000, Proteins.

[5]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  High-resolution protein-protein docking. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[6]  Z. Weng,et al.  Protein–protein docking benchmark 2.0: An update , 2005, Proteins.

[7]  Harry J. Gilbert,et al.  Cellulosome assembly revealed by the crystal structure of the cohesin–dockerin complex , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Miriam Eisenstein,et al.  Inherent limitations in protein-protein docking procedures , 2007, Bioinform..

[9]  O Noivirt,et al.  Docking to single‐domain and multiple‐domain proteins: Old and new challenges , 2005, Proteins.

[10]  Alain Roussel,et al.  The Dual Nature of the Wheat Xylanase Protein Inhibitor XIP-I , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  J. Janin The targets of CAPRI rounds 6–12 , 2007, Proteins.

[12]  R. Bahadur,et al.  The interface of protein-protein complexes: Analysis of contacts and prediction of interactions , 2008, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[13]  S. Wodak,et al.  Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3–5 shows progress in docking procedures , 2005, Proteins.

[14]  M J Sternberg,et al.  Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes , 1999, Proteins.

[15]  R. Read,et al.  Atomic solvation parameters in the analysis of protein‐protein docking results , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[16]  Matthias Buck,et al.  Binding of Rac1, Rnd1, and RhoD to a Novel Rho GTPase Interaction Motif Destabilizes Dimerization of the Plexin-B1 Effector Domain* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  Pedro A Fernandes,et al.  Hot spots—A review of the protein–protein interface determinant amino‐acid residues , 2007, Proteins.

[18]  C. Chothia,et al.  The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  Vladimir Tumanyan,et al.  Comprehensive statistical analysis of residues interaction specificity at protein–protein interfaces , 2007, Proteins.

[20]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Flexible protein-protein docking. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[21]  J. Janin,et al.  Dissecting protein–protein recognition sites , 2002, Proteins.

[22]  Jérôme Azé,et al.  A new protein-protein docking scoring function based on interface residue properties , 2007, Bioinform..

[23]  A. Bogan,et al.  Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  S. Wodak,et al.  Assessment of blind predictions of protein–protein interactions: Current status of docking methods , 2003, Proteins.

[25]  Hui Lu,et al.  Development of unified statistical potentials describing protein-protein interactions. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[26]  J. Thornton,et al.  Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  Richard M. Jackson,et al.  Predicting protein interaction sites: binding hot-spots in protein-protein and protein-ligand interfaces , 2006, Bioinform..

[28]  A. McCoy,et al.  Electrostatic complementarity at protein/protein interfaces. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Edward A Bayer,et al.  Evidence for a dual binding mode of dockerin modules to cohesins , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Roberto Dominguez,et al.  Structural basis of protein phosphatase 1 regulation , 2004, Nature.

[31]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Statistical analysis and prediction of protein–protein interfaces , 2005, Proteins.

[32]  Heinrich Sticht,et al.  A protein‐specifically adapted scoring function for the reranking of docking solutions , 2007, Proteins.

[33]  C. Chothia,et al.  The structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[34]  Miriam Eisenstein,et al.  Hydrophobic complementarity in protein–protein docking , 2004, Proteins.

[35]  J. Thornton,et al.  Diversity of protein–protein interactions , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[36]  N. Ben-Tal,et al.  Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein–protein interfaces , 2001, Proteins.

[37]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Data‐driven docking for the study of biomolecular complexes , 2005, The FEBS journal.

[38]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  CAPRI: A Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions , 2003, Proteins.

[39]  L. Wyns,et al.  Three camelid VHH domains in complex with porcine pancreatic alpha-amylase. Inhibition and versatility of binding topology. , 2002, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[40]  O. Lund,et al.  Prediction of residues in discontinuous B‐cell epitopes using protein 3D structures , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[41]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics , 2002, Proteins.

[42]  J. Janin The targets of CAPRI rounds 3–5 , 2005, Proteins.

[43]  Zhonggang Hou,et al.  Structural basis of the Sir1-origin recognition complex interaction in transcriptional silencing. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Stephen R. Comeau,et al.  PIPER: An FFT‐based protein docking program with pairwise potentials , 2006, Proteins.

[45]  Miriam Eisenstein,et al.  Weighted geometric docking: Incorporating external information in the rotation‐translation scan , 2003, Proteins.

[46]  R. Norel,et al.  Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[47]  P. Chakrabarti,et al.  Conservation and relative importance of residues across protein-protein interfaces , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  Nicolas Leulliot,et al.  Structure of the yeast tRNA m7G methylation complex. , 2008, Structure.

[49]  Human Rezaei,et al.  Insight into the PrPC-->PrPSc conversion from the structures of antibody-bound ovine prion scrapie-susceptibility variants. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  ZRANK: Reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function , 2007, Proteins.

[51]  Junichi Takagi,et al.  [Complex between nidogen and laminin fragments reveals a paradigmatic beta-propeller interface]. , 2003, Tanpakushitsu kakusan koso. Protein, nucleic acid, enzyme.

[52]  J. Janin,et al.  Revisiting the Voronoi description of protein–protein interfaces , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[53]  Tammy M. K. Cheng,et al.  pyDock: Electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid‐body protein–protein docking , 2007, Proteins.

[54]  Ralf Ficner,et al.  Structural basis for the bifunctionality of the U5 snRNP 52K protein (CD2BP2). , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[55]  S. Jones,et al.  Protein domain interfaces: characterization and comparison with oligomeric protein interfaces. , 2000, Protein engineering.

[56]  Vasant Honavar,et al.  Characterization of Protein–Protein Interfaces , 2008, The protein journal.

[57]  Z. Weng,et al.  Structure, function, and evolution of transient and obligate protein-protein interactions. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  J. Janin,et al.  Dissecting subunit interfaces in homodimeric proteins , 2003, Proteins.

[59]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions , 2002, Proteins.

[60]  Junichi Takagi,et al.  Complex between nidogen and laminin fragments reveals a paradigmatic β-propeller interface , 2003, Nature.

[61]  Keith Wilson,et al.  Structural and mutational analyses of the interaction between the barley alpha-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor and the subtilisin savinase reveal a novel mode of inhibition. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[62]  Julie Bernauer,et al.  DiMoVo: a Voronoi tessellation-based method for discriminating crystallographic and biological protein-protein interactions , 2008, Bioinform..

[63]  Shan Chang,et al.  Complex-type-dependent scoring functions in protein-protein docking. , 2007, Biophysical chemistry.

[64]  Jan A. Delcour,et al.  Structural Basis for Inhibition of Aspergillus niger Xylanase by Triticum aestivum Xylanase Inhibitor-I* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[65]  Colin Kleanthous,et al.  Molecular mimicry enables competitive recruitment by a natively disordered protein. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[66]  M. Levitt,et al.  A unified statistical framework for sequence comparison and structure comparison. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[67]  Mylène Perderiset,et al.  Structural basis for ARF1‐mediated recruitment of ARHGAP21 to Golgi membranes , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[68]  Dietmar Schomburg,et al.  Efficient comprehensive scoring of docked protein complexes using probabilistic support vector machines , 2007, Proteins.

[69]  S. Jones,et al.  Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[70]  M J Sternberg,et al.  Predictive docking of protein-protein and protein-DNA complexes. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[71]  J. Janin,et al.  Structural basis of macromolecular recognition. , 2002, Advances in protein chemistry.

[72]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Shape complementarity at protein–protein interfaces , 1994, Biopolymers.

[73]  Hongbo Zhu,et al.  NOXclass: prediction of protein-protein interaction types , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[74]  E. Katchalski‐Katzir,et al.  Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[75]  K. Henrick,et al.  Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[76]  Joël Janin,et al.  Genome-wide studies of protein-protein interaction. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[77]  M. Sternberg,et al.  The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[78]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  Classification of protein complexes based on docking difficulty , 2005, Proteins.

[79]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  Combination of scoring functions improves discrimination in protein–protein docking , 2003, Proteins.

[80]  Marc Graille,et al.  Crystal structure of the complex between the monomeric form of Toxoplasma gondii surface antigen 1 (SAG1) and a monoclonal antibody that mimics the human immune response. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[81]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[82]  Miriam Eisenstein,et al.  On proteins, grids, correlations, and docking. , 2004, Comptes rendus biologies.

[83]  Miha Vuk,et al.  ROC curve, lift chart and calibration plot , 2006, Advances in Methodology and Statistics.

[84]  Hongmin Li,et al.  Structures of two streptococcal superantigens bound to TCR beta chains reveal diversity in the architecture of T cell signaling complexes. , 2002, Structure.

[85]  Miriam Eisenstein,et al.  Electrostatics in protein–protein docking , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[86]  B. Rost,et al.  Analysing six types of protein-protein interfaces. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[87]  Marc Graille,et al.  Structural inhibition of the colicin D tRNase by the tRNA‐mimicking immunity protein , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[88]  Joël Janin,et al.  Welcome to CAPRI: A Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions , 2002 .

[89]  J. Skehel,et al.  An antibody that prevents the hemagglutinin low pH fusogenic transition. , 2002, Virology.

[90]  Sarah A. Teichmann,et al.  Principles of protein-protein interactions , 2002, ECCB.

[91]  Werner Braun,et al.  Statistical analysis of physical-chemical properties and prediction of protein-protein interfaces , 2007, Journal of molecular modeling.