In vitro effect of focused ultrasound or thermal stress on HSP70 expression and cell viability in three tumor cell lines.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES In this study, we compared the effect of focused ultrasound with the effect of thermal stress on the induction of a heat inducible promoter in an in vitro model using three tumor cell lines (M21, SCCVII, and NIH3T3). MATERIALS AND METHODS We used a reporter construct that was generated using the stress-inducible promoter from the gene encoding a murine 70-kilodalton heat shock protein (Hsp70A.1) and a luciferase (luc) reporter plasmid. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) was applied in two different modes. In the first mode, an increasing voltage at constant pulse duration and in the second mode a constant voltage at increasing pulse duration was applied. HIFU or thermal stress was delivered over a range of temperatures (36-52 degrees C) for 5 minutes, and resulting luciferase activity was measured in live cells using a cooled charge-coupled device camera as a measure of reporter gene transcription. Luciferase activity was measured at set time intervals for a total of 108 hours post-stress. RESULTS Both methods induced the hsp70 promoter; however, the luciferase activity under the influence of HIFU, independent of the applied mode, and thermal stress differs despite the fact that the temperature was the same. In the M21 tumor cell line, the maximum luciferase activity after focused ultrasound application was 4818 +/- 1521% at a temperature of 48 degrees C and after thermal stress 4468.2 +/- 1890.2% at a temperature of 52 degrees C with a viability of 72.3 +/- 5.2% and 85 +/- 3.4%, respectively. In the SCC tumor cell line, the maximum luciferase activity after focused ultrasound application was 6743.0 +/- 3281.4% and after only thermal stress exposure was 3910.6 +/- 2189.0% at a temperature of 44 degrees C and 50 degrees C, respectively. At the highest luciferase activity, the portion of vital cells was 72.5 +/- 8.4% and 72.5 +/- 5.9% respectively. In the NIH3T3 tumor cell line the highest luciferase activity of 428510.6 +/- 26526.8% was seen at a temperature of 42 degrees C applying focused ultrasound. Under thermal stress it was 29221.3 +/- 7205.0% at a temperature of 50 degrees C. At the highest luciferase activity, the viability analysis showed 75.3 +/- 9.2% and 72.3 +/- 7.9% viable cells, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Focused ultrasound induces hsp70 expression like thermal stress alone; however, HIFU is capable of inducing expression at lower temperatures than heat stress alone, indicating that nonthermal effects also play a role on the induction of hsp70.

[1]  J A de Zwart,et al.  Spatial and temporal control of transgene expression in vivo using a heat‐sensitive promoter and MRI‐guided focused ultrasound , 2003, The journal of gene medicine.

[2]  J. Debus,et al.  A comparison of shock wave and sinusoidal-focused ultrasound-induced localized transfection of HeLa cells. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  K. Henle,et al.  Inhibition of heat shock protein synthesis and protein glycosylation by stepdown heating. , 1991, Experimental cell research.

[4]  M. Dewhirst,et al.  Enhancement of radiotherapy by hyperthermia-regulated gene therapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  P. Huber,et al.  In vitro and in vivo transfection of plasmid DNA in the Dunning prostate tumor R3327-AT1 is enhanced by focused ultrasound , 2000, Gene Therapy.

[6]  David K. Stevenson,et al.  Bioluminescent indicators in living mammals , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[7]  K Hynynen,et al.  The effect of various physical parameters on the size and shape of necrosed tissue volume during ultrasound surgery. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  M Simkó,et al.  Hsp70 expression and free radical release after exposure to non-thermal radio-frequency electromagnetic fields and ultrafine particles in human Mono Mac 6 cells. , 2006, Toxicology letters.

[9]  Guy Vallancien,et al.  High-intensity focused ultrasound and localized prostate cancer: efficacy results from the European multicentric study. , 2003, Journal of endourology.

[10]  C. Contag,et al.  Advances in in vivo bioluminescence imaging of gene expression. , 2002, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[11]  P. Srivastava,et al.  Tumor‐specific cell surface expression of the ‐KDEL containing endoplasmic reticular heat shock protein gp96 , 1996, International journal of cancer.

[12]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Targeted disruption of the blood–brain barrier with focused ultrasound: association with cavitation activity , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  C E Hooper,et al.  Low-light imaging technology in the life sciences. , 1994, Journal of bioluminescence and chemiluminescence.

[14]  P. Huber,et al.  Tumor Cytotoxicity In Vivo and Radical Formation In Vitro Depend on the Shock Wave-Induced Cavitation Dose , 2001, Radiation research.

[15]  J. Debus,et al.  Sonochemically induced radicals generated by pulsed high-energy ultrasound in vitro and in vivo. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  Qing‐Li Zhao,et al.  Effects of dissolved gases and an echo contrast agent on apoptosis induced by ultrasound and its mechanism via the mitochondria-caspase pathway. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  S. Pierce,et al.  A case for chaperones in antigen processing. , 1992, Immunology today.

[18]  L. Hightower,et al.  Heat shock, stress proteins, chaperones, and proteotoxicity , 1991, Cell.

[19]  K. Suslick,et al.  Sonoluminescence from non-aqueous liquids , 1987, Nature.

[20]  F. Hartl Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding , 1996, Nature.

[21]  F. Hartl,et al.  Molecular chaperone functions of heat-shock proteins. , 1993, Annual review of biochemistry.

[22]  Victor Frenkel,et al.  Potential role of pulsed-high intensity focused ultrasound in gene therapy. , 2006, Future oncology.

[23]  Christopher H Contag,et al.  A genetic reporter of thermal stress defines physiologic zones over a defined temperature range , 2004, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[24]  C. Moonen,et al.  Control of transgene expression using local hyperthermia in combination with a heat‐sensitive promoter , 2000, The journal of gene medicine.

[25]  Wen-zhi Chen,et al.  A randomised clinical trial of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for the treatment of patients with localised breast cancer , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[26]  J. Debus,et al.  A new noninvasive approach in breast cancer therapy using magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery. , 2001, Cancer research.

[27]  R. Morimoto,et al.  Expression of human HSP70 during the synthetic phase of the cell cycle. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Masafumi Oshiro,et al.  Visualizing Gene Expression in Living Mammals Using a Bioluminescent Reporter , 1997, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[29]  S. Mitragotri,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated transdermal protein delivery , 1995, Science.

[30]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Focused ultrasound (HIFU) induces localized enhancement of reporter gene expression in rabbit carotid artery , 2003, Gene Therapy.

[31]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Apoptosis in ultrasound-produced threshold lesions in the rabbit brain. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[32]  L. Lagneaux,et al.  Ultrasonic low-energy treatment: a novel approach to induce apoptosis in human leukemic cells. , 2002, Experimental hematology.

[33]  W. Nyborg,et al.  Current status of research on biophysical effects of ultrasound. , 1994, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[34]  R. Voellmy,et al.  High-level, heat-regulated synthesis of proteins in eukaryotic cells. , 1986, Gene.

[35]  R. Morimoto,et al.  1 The Stress Response, Function of the Proteins, and Perspectives , 1990 .

[36]  F. Gleeson,et al.  High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of liver tumours. , 2004, Ultrasonics.

[37]  R. Morimoto,et al.  Stress proteins in biology and medicine , 1991 .

[38]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Apoptosis signals in lymphoblasts induced by focused ultrasound , 2004, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[39]  C. Moonen,et al.  Spatial and temporal control of expression of therapeutic genes using heat shock protein promoters. , 2005, Methods.

[40]  F A Jolesz,et al.  Determination of the optimal delay between sonications during focused ultrasound surgery in rabbits by using MR imaging to monitor thermal buildup in vivo. , 1999, Radiology.

[41]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Protein folding in the cell , 1992, Nature.

[42]  M. Dewhirst,et al.  Heat-induced gene expression as a novel targeted cancer gene therapy strategy. , 2000, Cancer research.

[43]  N. Arispe,et al.  ATP and ADP Modulate a Cation Channel Formed by Hsc70 in Acidic Phospholipid Membranes* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.