Horses for courses – but no favourites. A reply to three commentaries

Our paper (Hignett and Wilson 2004) has elicited a range of responses from the commentaries. Hancock and Szalma (2004), and Desnoyers (2004), are largely supportive of embracing the challenge to take a wider perspective for the theoretical foundations for ergonomics, whilst Kanis (2004) looks in detail at operational issues citing two examples where both qualitative and quantitative approaches could be used. We have achieved our aim of provoking a discussion and are heartened by the support for the use of qualitative methodology in ergonomics research and practice.

[1]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  Epistemological Issues about Ergonomics and Human Factors , 2006 .

[2]  P. A. Hancock,et al.  On the relevance of qualitative methods for ergonomics , 2004 .

[3]  H. Kanis,et al.  The quantitative-qualitative research dichotomy revisited , 2004 .

[4]  L. Desnoyers.  The role of qualitative methodology in ergonomics: a commentary , 2004 .

[5]  John R. Wilson,et al.  The role for qualitative methodology in ergonomics: a case study to explore theoretical issues , 2004 .

[6]  Sarah Nichols,et al.  Cognitive Work Investigation and Design in Practice: The Influence of Social Context and Social Work Artefacts , 2003 .

[7]  Roger Haslam,et al.  What do older people know about safety on stairs? , 2001, Ageing and Society.

[8]  S. Hignett.  Using qualitative methodology in ergonomics : theoretical background and practical examples. , 2001 .

[9]  J R Wilson,et al.  Fundamentals of ergonomics in theory and practice. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  K Grimmer,et al.  Gender-age environmental associates of adolescent low back pain. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  C. Seale,et al.  Quality in Qualitative Research , 1999 .

[12]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Functional Limitations to Daily Living Tasks in the Aged: A Focus Group Analysis , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[13]  E. Murphy,et al.  Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[14]  Wes Sharrock.  The Philosophy of Social Research, 3rd edition , 1997 .

[15]  Tim May,et al.  Situating Social Theory , 1996 .

[16]  Jens Aagaard,et al.  A comparative study of three different kinds of school furniture. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[17]  Martin Hollis,et al.  The philosophy of social science , 2007 .

[18]  Martin Hollis,et al.  The philosophy of social science : an introduction , 1994 .

[19]  Neville Moray,et al.  Technosophy and Humane Factors , 1993 .

[20]  Peter M. Chisnall,et al.  Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement , 1993 .

[21]  A. N. Oppenheim,et al.  Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement , 1992 .

[22]  Véronique De Keyser.  Work analysis in French language ergonomics: origins and current research trends , 1991 .

[23]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[24]  J. Hughes,et al.  The philosophy of social research , 1981 .

[25]  A. Wisner,et al.  THE SOCIETY'S LECTURE, 1972 Given at the U.W.I.S.T., Cardiff, on 13th April , 1972 .

[26]  A Wisner,et al.  Diagnosis in ergonomics or the choice of operating models in field research. , 1972, Ergonomics.

[27]  A. Cicourel.  Method and measurement in sociology , 1965 .