Assessment of the dimensions and surface characteristics of orthodontic wires and bracket slots.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dimensions and surface characteristics of orthodontic wires and bracket slots of different commercial brands. METHODS Thirty metallic brackets (0.022 x 0.028-in and 0.022 x 0.030-in) were divided into three groups: DYN/3M group = Dyna-Lock, 3M/Unitek (stainless steel, or SS); STD/MO group = Slim Morelli (SS); and Ni-Free/MO group = Slim Morelli (Ni-Free). The stainless steel wires (0.019 x 0.025-in) were divided into two groups: MO group = Morelli; and 3M group = 3M/Unitek. The bracket and wire measurements were done by two methods: (a) Surface Electron Microscopy (SEM), and (b) Profile Projection. The surface analysis was done qualitatively, based on SEM images and/or by a rugosimeter. The quantitative results were analyzed by ANOVA with Tukey's test (p < 0.05) and Student's t test. RESULTS A significant difference in the dimensions of slots was observed, and the NiFree/MO group showed the greatest changes when compared to the other groups. The analysis of surface topography of the brackets indicated greater homogeneity of the metallic matrix for DYN/3M and STD/MO groups. As for the dimensions of the wires, groups showed statistically different mean heights. CONCLUSIONS It was concluded that wires and brackets slots can present altered dimensions, which might directly and unintentionally affect the planned tooth movement.

[1]  M. Pichelmayer,et al.  Bracket Slot and Archwire Dimensions: Manufacturing Precision and Third Order Clearance , 2010, Journal of orthodontics.

[2]  José Nelson Mucha,et al.  Avaliação dimensional de slots de braquetes metálicos , 2010 .

[3]  R. Souza,et al.  Biodegradação de braquetes ortodônticos: análise por microscopia eletrônica de varredura , 2010 .

[4]  H. Kim,et al.  Corrosion of stainless steel, nickel-titanium, coated nickel-titanium, and titanium orthodontic wires. , 2010, The Angle orthodontist.

[5]  F. Mcdonald,et al.  An evaluation of slot size in orthodontic brackets--are standards as expected? , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[6]  R. Souza,et al.  Biodegradação de braquetes ortodônticos: avaliação da liberação iônica in vitro , 2008 .

[7]  F. Sernetz Standardization of Orthodontic Products—Does it Make Sense? , 2005, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie.

[8]  C. Azevedo Characterisation of metallic piercings , 2003 .

[9]  D Chappard,et al.  Image analysis measurements of roughness by texture and fractal analysis correlate with contact profilometry. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[10]  S. Lee,et al.  Effects of recycling on the mechanical properties and the surface topography of nickel-titanium alloy wires. , 2001, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[11]  R. Nanda,et al.  Comparison of frictional resistance in titanium and stainless steel brackets. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  Siatkowski Re Loss of anterior torque control due to variations in bracket slot and archwire dimensions. , 1999 .

[13]  R P Kusy,et al.  Friction between different wire-bracket configurations and materials. , 1997, Seminars in orthodontics.

[14]  R. Kusy,et al.  Surface topography and frictional characteristics of ceramic brackets. , 1994, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  T. Nakayama,et al.  Frictional forces with the friction-free edgewise bracket. , 1994, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[16]  R. N. Moore,et al.  Frictional properties of metal and ceramic brackets. , 1992, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[17]  J C Gunsolley,et al.  Frictional resistance of ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[18]  R S Nanda,et al.  Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[19]  K L Baker,et al.  Frictional changes in force values caused by saliva substitution. , 1987, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[20]  R J Nikolai,et al.  A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch wire. , 1980, American journal of orthodontics.

[21]  R S Nanda,et al.  Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.