Qualitative/quantitative integration in the inductive observational study of interactive behaviour: impact of recording and coding among predominating perspectives

A strong dichotomy has traditionally been established between qualitative and quantitative approaches. This question has been the subject of intense debate from a methodological point of view, and in recent years there are clear signs that the conflict is being overcome; nevertheless, we are still some way from a genuine position of complementarity and integration, and the issue remains to be considered in the process of theorization along the tortuous path that leads from the particular to the general. The proposal in this article takes a further step forward as regards this question, this time with respect to the study of interactive behaviour. The key is once again the consideration of a “complete unit” of analysis, but the logic of the observational methodology process enables the perspectives to be sequenced: the study begins with a predominantly qualitative approach before subjecting the data to a given type of recording (through the important support of field formats) and coding (preferably computerized), thus producing a matrix of formally interchangeable data; finally, the criterion is reversed and the study continues under a predominantly quantitative perspective.

[1]  Terri Gullickson Analyzing Interaction: Sequential Analysis With SDIS and GSEQ. , 1996 .

[2]  Sowmyanarayanan Sadagopan,et al.  WWW: service provider , 2002, UBIQ.

[3]  Paolo Brandimarte,et al.  Quantitative Methods: An Introduction for Business Management , 2011 .

[4]  Gudberg K. Jonsson,et al.  Hidden patterns of play interaction in soccer using SOF-CODER , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[5]  Frederick Erickson,et al.  SOME APPROACHES TO INQUIRY IN SCHOOL‐COMMUNITY ETHNOGRAPHY , 1977 .

[6]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[7]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  Applying observational methods: A systematic view. , 1987 .

[8]  Pedro Sánchez-Algarra,et al.  The collapsibility theorem in log-linear analysis of categorical data: an application in program evaluation , 1997 .

[9]  Renata Tesch,et al.  Qualitative research : analysis types and software tools , 1990 .

[10]  K. Brazil,et al.  Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research , 2002, Quality & quantity.

[11]  M S Magnusson,et al.  Discovering hidden time patterns in behavior: T-patterns and their detection , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[12]  María Teresa Anguera Argilaga,et al.  Diseños observacionales, cuestión clave en el proceso de la metodología observacional , 2001 .

[13]  N. Blaikie A critique of the use of triangulation in social research , 1991 .

[14]  Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.  Data Analysis Strategies for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs , 1993 .

[15]  D. Mayo Duhem's Problem, the Bayesian Way, and Error Statistics, or "What's Belief Got to Do with It?" , 1997, Philosophy of Science.

[16]  C. W. Roberts,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Quantitative Text Analysis , 2000 .

[17]  Time Management in the Cost Evaluation of Limited Resource Programs , 2005 .

[18]  L. Cronbach Beyond the Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology. , 1975 .

[19]  C. Boustani Oralité et gestualité , 2009 .

[20]  S. Duncan,et al.  Microanalysis of T-patterns . Analysis of Symmetry / Asymmetry in Social Interaction , 2005 .

[21]  M. Bulmer Concepts in the Analysis of Qualitative Data , 1979 .

[22]  Ernest R. House,et al.  Integrating the quantitative and qualitative , 1994 .

[23]  Roger Douglas,et al.  Unfinished business. , 2012, Prescrire international.

[24]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[25]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[26]  George Muskens Mathematical analysis of content , 1985 .

[27]  N. Verloop,et al.  Multi-Method Triangulation in a Qualitative Study on Teachers' Practical Knowledge: An Attempt to Increase Internal Validity , 2002 .

[28]  L. Cronbach The two disciplines of scientific psychology. , 1957 .

[29]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Research Act , 1978 .

[30]  Nancy L. Leech,et al.  A Call for Qualitative Power Analyses , 2007 .

[31]  Anguera Argilaga,et al.  La investigación cualitativa , 1986 .

[32]  R. Weber Measurement models for content analysis , 1983 .

[33]  Steven I. Miller,et al.  Some brief notes on the “unfinished business” of qualitative inquiry , 1997 .

[34]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  Defining observational competence , 1984 .

[35]  J. Gatta,et al.  The Use of Mixed Methods Models and Designs in the Human Sciences: Problems and Prospects , 2006 .

[36]  Richard N. Adams,et al.  Human Organization Research , 1961 .

[37]  W. Wallace The logic of science in sociology , 1971 .

[38]  T. Cook,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research , 1981 .

[39]  Normand Péladeau,et al.  Force and Influence in Content Analysis: The Production of New Social Knowledge , 2003 .

[40]  Teresa Anguera-Argilaga Observational typology , 1979 .

[41]  J. Kopinak The Use of Triangulation in a Study of Refugee Well-Being , 1999 .

[42]  C. Hempel,et al.  Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. , 1966 .

[43]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[44]  R. Hogenraad,et al.  Replicating Text: The Cumulation of Knowledge in Social Science , 1999 .

[45]  Gerald Prein,et al.  Triangulation: Validity and empirically-based hypothesis construction , 1997 .

[46]  Sharon F. Rallis,et al.  The Qualitative-Quantitative Debate: New Perspectives. , 1994 .

[47]  Vincent Peters,et al.  The Validity of Laboratory Research in Social and Behavioral Science , 2001 .

[48]  Verónica Morales-Sánchez,et al.  Optimising a Probabilistic Model of the Development of Play in Soccer , 2007 .

[49]  Karl Henrik Sivesind Structured, Qualitative Comparison , 1999 .

[50]  P.J.M. Verschuren Holism versus Reductionism in Modern Social Science Research , 2001 .

[51]  R. Smith Social Structural Inquiries, Part 1, Qualitative and Quantitative Theories , 2005 .

[52]  Valerie J. Caracelli,et al.  Advances in mixed-method evaluation : the challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms , 1997 .

[53]  Sharon F. Rallis,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative inquiries are not incompatible: A call for a new partnership , 1994 .

[54]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[55]  Valerie J. Caracelli,et al.  Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs , 1989 .

[56]  N. Leech,et al.  On Becoming a Pragmatic Researcher: The Importance of Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methodologies , 2005 .

[57]  Ronald K. Hambleton,et al.  Encyclopedia of psychological assessment , 2002 .

[58]  Oleguer Camerino,et al.  Mixed methods research in the movement sciences : case studies in sport, physical education and dance , 2012 .

[59]  J. Smith Quantitative Versus Qualitative Research: An Attempt to Clarify the Issue , 1983 .

[60]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation methods , 1981 .

[61]  M. Magnússon Hidden Real-Time Patterns in Intra- and Inter-Individual Behavior: Description and Detection , 1996 .

[62]  N. Leech,et al.  Taking the “Q” Out of Research: Teaching Research Methodology Courses Without the Divide Between Quantitative and Qualitative Paradigms , 2005 .

[63]  Douglas Bruce Sawin,et al.  Psychosocial risks in infant-environment transactions , 1980 .

[64]  Steven J. Taylor Introduction to qualitative research methods , 1975 .

[65]  J. Osofsky Handbook of infant development , 1979 .

[66]  D L Morgan,et al.  Practical Strategies for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Applications to Health Research , 1998, Qualitative health research.

[67]  A Steckler,et al.  Toward Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: An Introduction , 1992, Health education quarterly.