Conscious thought beats deliberation without attention in diagnostic decision-making: at least when you are an expert

Contrary to what common sense makes us believe, deliberation without attention has recently been suggested to produce better decisions in complex situations than deliberation with attention. Based on differences between cognitive processes of experts and novices, we hypothesized that experts make in fact better decisions after consciously thinking about complex problems whereas novices may benefit from deliberation-without-attention. These hypotheses were confirmed in a study among doctors and medical students. They diagnosed complex and routine problems under three conditions, an immediate-decision condition and two delayed conditions: conscious thought and deliberation-without-attention. Doctors did better with conscious deliberation when problems were complex, whereas reasoning mode did not matter in simple problems. In contrast, deliberation-without-attention improved novices’ decisions, but only in simple problems. Experts benefit from consciously thinking about complex problems; for novices thinking does not help in those cases.

[1]  Henk G Schmidt,et al.  Breaking down automaticity: case ambiguity and the shift to reflective approaches in clinical reasoning , 2007, Medical education.

[2]  Claudia González-Vallejo,et al.  The Deliberation-Without-Attention Effect , 2009, Psychological science.

[3]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Rick B. van Baaren,et al.  On Making the Right Choice: The Deliberation-Without-Attention Effect , 2006, Science.

[5]  Jonathan Evans.  Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[6]  S. Sloman.  The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[7]  Henk G. Schmidt,et al.  On the Constraints of Encapsulated Knowledge: Clinical Case Representations by Medical Experts and Subexperts , 2002 .

[8]  S. Mamede,et al.  Effects of reflective practice on the accuracy of medical diagnoses , 2008, Medical education.

[9]  N. Franklin,et al.  Diagnostic error in internal medicine. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  A. Dijksterhuis.  Think different: the merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Rick B. van Baaren,et al.  Predicting Soccer Matches After Unconscious and Conscious Thought as a Function of Expertise , 2009, Psychological science.

[12]  H. Schmidt,et al.  On acquiring expertise in medicine , 1993 .

[13]  Donald Redelmeier,et al.  The Cognitive Psychology of Missed Diagnoses , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  K. Eva,et al.  Diagnostic error and clinical reasoning , 2010, Medical education.

[15]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[17]  Felix Acker.  New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: additional empirical data and meta-analysis. , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[18]  H. Schmidt,et al.  A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: theory and implication [published erratum appears in Acad Med 1992 Apr;67(4):287] , 1990, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[19]  Arnaud Rey,et al.  Does unconscious thought improve complex decision making? , 2009, Psychological research.

[20]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? , 2002 .

[21]  Tim Rakow,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Think, Blink or Sleep on It? the Impact of Modes of Thought on Complex Decision Making , 2022 .

[22]  D. Kahneman.  A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[23]  G. Norman.  Research in clinical reasoning: past history and current trends , 2005, Medical education.

[24]  J. Klein,et al.  Five pitfalls in decisions about diagnosis and prescribing , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  D. Derauf,et al.  Cognitive psychology of missed diagnoses. , 2005, Annals of internal medicine.

[26]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Overcoming intuition: metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  M. Osman.  An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  H. Schmidt,et al.  A Cognitive Perspective on Medical Expertise: Theory and Implications , 1990 .

[29]  Geoffrey R. Norman,et al.  The Non-Analytical Basis of Clinical Reasoning , 1997, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[30]  Henk G Schmidt,et al.  How expertise develops in medicine: knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation , 2007, Medical education.

[31]  Arthur S Elstein,et al.  Thinking about diagnostic thinking: a 30-year perspective , 2009, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.