A Comparison of Multi-Item Likert and Visual Analogue Scales for the Assessment of Transactionally Defined Coping Function

Summary: The evaluation and monitoring of interventions that are designed to alleviate psychosocial stress rely largely on subjective assessments of coping as primary outcome measures. The pros and cons of different response formats used to measure coping variables are unexplored; yet arguably, response format is a very important methodological issue for the clinical application and evaluation of psychosocial interventions. This study compared the levels of functional coping and transactional coping patterns assessed with multi-item 7-point Likert Scales (LS) and 65mm Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), within the framework of the Functional Dimensions of Coping (FDC) Scale developed by Ferguson and Cox, 1997. LS yielded significantly higher levels of functional coping for all four subscales, and captured a wider range of transactional coping patterns for the approach, emotion, and avoidance coping functions, than VAS. The authors recommend the use of LS for baseline assessments of transactionally defined copin...

[1]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  Jim Blascovich,et al.  Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal. , 1993 .

[3]  K. Parkes.  Coping, negative affectivity, and the work environment: additive and interactive predictors of mental health. , 1990, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  Wolff Bb.  Measurement of human pain. , 1980 .

[5]  N. Endler,et al.  If it changes, it might be unstable: examining the factor structure of the ways of coping questionnaire , 1993 .

[6]  Manuel G. Calvo,et al.  Emotional reactivity to social-evaluative stress: genderdifferences in response systems concordance , 1999 .

[7]  R. M. Mason,et al.  Comparison of fixed interval and visual analogue scales for rating chronic pain , 1975, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[8]  M. Powers,et al.  Psychometric Assessment of the Jalowiec Coping Scale , 1984, Nursing research.

[9]  J. Duthie.  Rheumatology and rehabilitation. , 1972, British medical journal.

[10]  N. Endler,et al.  Multidimensional assessment of coping: a critical evaluation. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  G. Guyatt,et al.  A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[12]  P. Dewe,et al.  Individual strategies for coping with stress at work: A review , 1993 .

[13]  M. Bushnell,et al.  Comparison of verbal and visual analogue scales for measuring the intensity and unpleasantness of experimental pain , 1989, Pain.

[14]  MacFarlane Me,et al.  Women, breast lump discovery, and associated stress , 1992 .

[15]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  Personality and stress: Individual differences in the stress process. , 1991 .

[16]  J. McMurray,et al.  A comparison of the reproducibility and the sensitivity to change of visual analogue scales, Borg scales, and Likert scales in normal subjects during submaximal exercise. , 1999, Chest.

[17]  S. Sony,et al.  Women, breast lump discovery, and associated stress. , 1992, Health care for women international.

[18]  N. Bellamy,et al.  Comparative study of self-rating pain scales in osteoarthritis patients. , 1999, Current medical research and opinion.

[19]  G H Guyatt,et al.  A comparison of seven-point and visual analogue scales. Data from a randomized trial. , 1990, Controlled clinical trials.

[20]  E C Huskisson,et al.  Measurement of functional capacity with visual analogue scales. , 1977, Rheumatology and rehabilitation.

[21]  A. Gift,et al.  Visual Analogue Scales: Measurement of Subjective Phenomena , 1989, Nursing research.

[22]  B. Knight,et al.  Explaining gender differences in caregiver distress: the roles of emotional attentiveness and coping styles. , 1994, Psychology and aging.

[23]  G. Brunier,et al.  A comparison of two methods of measuring fatigue in patients on chronic haemodialysis: visual analogue vs Likert scale. , 1996, International journal of nursing studies.

[24]  M. Hagen,et al.  Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[25]  G Borg,et al.  Comparison between the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Category Ratio Scale (CR-10) for the evaluation of leg exertion. , 1992, International journal of sports medicine.

[26]  D. Murphy,et al.  Measurement of Pain: A Comparison of the Visual Analogue with a Nonvisual Analogue Scale , 1987 .

[27]  H. M. van der Ploeg,et al.  Preconditions for Sensitivity in Measuring Change: Visual Analogue Scales Compared to Rating Scales in a Likert Format , 1995, Psychological reports.

[28]  L. Tibbling.  Angina-like chest pain in patients with oesophageal dysfunction. , 2009, Acta medica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[29]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[30]  T. Cox,et al.  The Functional Dimensions of Coping scale: Theory, reliability and validity , 1997 .

[31]  John P. Dickerson,et al.  The quality of life: design and evaluation of a self-assessment instrument for use with cancer patients. , 1987, International journal of nursing studies.

[32]  B. Wolff.  Measurement of human pain. , 1980, Research publications - Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease.

[33]  N. Bellamy,et al.  Comparative study of self-rating pain scales in rheumatoid arthritis patients. , 1999, Current medical research and opinion.

[34]  H. Adami,et al.  Self-rating of pain in nonulcer dyspepsia. A methodological study comparing a new fixed-point scale and the visual analogue scale. , 1987, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[35]  K. Hooker,et al.  Gender differences in the effectiveness of coping with dysphoria: A longitudinal study , 1992 .