Combining flexibility and reliability for mainstream organizational learning

Sense Making is a way for a High Reliability Organisation to become a Learning Organisation as they succeed in combining reliability (aspect of bureaucracy) with flexibility (aspect of adhocracy). We draw a parallel with mainstream organisations and how they reach this same objective through Knowledge Management. By offering a sense making perspective to Knowledge Management, we suggest that mainstream organisations may become true learning organisations.

[1]  K. Roberts.  Some Characteristics of One Type of High Reliability Organization , 1990 .

[2]  Steven T. Sonka,et al.  Advanced technology and knowledge transfer , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[3]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Circular organizing and triple loop learning , 1999 .

[4]  Karlene H. Roberts,et al.  The Incident Command System : High Reliability Organizing for Complex and Volatile Task , 2007 .

[5]  Paul C. van Fenema,et al.  Collaborative elasticity and breakdowns in high reliability organizations: contributions from distributed cognition and collective mind theory , 2005, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[6]  David Courpasson,et al.  Managerial Strategies of Domination. Power in Soft Bureaucracies , 2000 .

[7]  K. Roberts.  Managing High Reliability Organizations , 1990 .

[8]  K. Roberts,et al.  Must accidents happen? Lessons from high-reliability organizations , 2001 .

[9]  A. Mayer.  Preparing for Basel II by Optimizing Sarbanes-Oxley , 2003 .

[10]  M. Landau.  On the Concept of a Self-Correcting Organization , 1973 .

[11]  K. Weick.  Organizational Culture as a Source of High Reliability , 1987 .

[12]  R. Daft,et al.  Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems , 1984 .

[13]  Christine M. Pearson,et al.  Reframing Crisis Management , 1998 .

[14]  H. Tsoukas.  Knowledge as Action, Organization as Theory: , 2000 .

[15]  Charles Perrow,et al.  Organizing to Reduce the Vulnerabilities of Complexity , 1999 .

[16]  F. Barrett.  Creativity and Improvisation in Jazz and Organizations: Implications for Organizational Learning , 1998 .

[17]  David Courpasson,et al.  Trite News Story or Sign of the Times ? Variations around the Power of Bureaucracies , 2003 .

[18]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in 5's: A Synthesis of the Research on Organization Design , 1980, Management Science.

[19]  C. Argyris.  Double Loop Learning in Organizations , 1996 .

[20]  M. Nathan.  How past becomes prologue: a sensemaking interpretation of the hindsight-foresight relationship given the circumstances of crisis , 2004 .

[21]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  Sensemaking and Knowledge Management , 2004 .

[22]  T. L. Porte.  High Reliability Organizations: Unlikely, Demanding and At Risk , 1996 .

[23]  Karl E. Weick.  Laboratory Experimentation with Organizations: A Reappraisal , 1977 .

[24]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  Knowledge as Action, Organization as Theory: Reflections on Organizational Knowledge , 2000 .

[25]  K. Roberts,et al.  Risk Mitigation in Large-Scale Systems: Lessons from High Reliability Organizations , 1997 .

[26]  Cynthia F. Kurtz,et al.  The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex and complicated world , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.