Types of research output profiles: A multilevel latent class analysis of the Austrian Science Fund’s final project report data
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Rüdiger Mutz,et al. University and student segmentation: multilevel latent-class analysis of students' attitudes towards research methods and statistics. , 2013, The British journal of educational psychology.
[2] V. Neuhaus,et al. Latent Class Analysis , 2010 .
[3] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Heterogeneity of Inter-Rater Reliabilities of Grant Peer Reviews and Its Determinants: A General Estimating Equations Approach , 2012, PloS one.
[4] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Measuring the societal impact of research , 2012, EMBO reports.
[5] Alessandro Liberati,et al. Conceptual frameworks and empirical approaches used to assess the impact of health research: an overview of reviews , 2011, Health research policy and systems.
[6] L. Butler,et al. Evaluating University Research Performance Using Metrics , 2011 .
[7] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization , 2011, J. Informetrics.
[8] C. Fischer,et al. Factors Influencing Approval Probability in Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Decision-Making Procedures - FWF Stand-Alone Projects Programme, 1999 to 2008 , 2010 .
[9] Jeroen K. Vermunt,et al. Latent Class Modeling with Covariates: Two Improved Three-Step Approaches , 2010, Political Analysis.
[10] Bengt Muthén,et al. Multilevel Latent Class Analysis: An Application of Adolescent Smoking Typologies With Individual and Contextual Predictors , 2010, Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal.
[11] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS ("Leiden") evaluations of research performance , 2010, J. Informetrics.
[12] Rüdiger Mutz,et al. A Nomothetic Version of the Brunswikian Lens Model: A Variable- and Person-Oriented Approach , 2010 .
[13] E. Hazelkorn. Assessing Europe's University-Based Research , 2010 .
[14] Kristi L Holmes,et al. Beyond citation analysis: a model for assessment of research impact. , 2010, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[15] Berthold Lausen,et al. Advances in Data Analysis, Data Handling and Business Intelligence - Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V., Joint Conference with the British Classification Society (BCS) and the Dutch/Flemish Classification Society (VOC), Helmut-Schmidt-University, Ha , 2010, GfKl.
[16] A. J. M. Linmans,et al. Why with bibliometrics the Humanities does not need to be the weakest link , 2010, Scientometrics.
[17] Mike Thelwall,et al. Google book search: Citation analysis for social science and the humanities , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[18] Fletcher T. H. Cole,et al. Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[19] L. Butler,et al. Metrics or Peer Review? Evaluating the 2001 UK Research Assessment Exercise in Political Science , 2009 .
[20] Yu-Wei Chang,et al. Characteristics of research output in social sciences and humanities: From a research evaluation perspective , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[21] G. Glass. Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research , 2008 .
[22] Linda Butler,et al. ICT assessment: Moving beyond journal outputs , 2008, Scientometrics.
[23] Jeroen K. Vermunt,et al. Determining the Number of Components in Mixture Models for Hierarchical Data , 2008, GfKl.
[24] F. Veloso,et al. The determinants of research output and impact: A study of Mexican researchers , 2007 .
[25] R. Mutz,et al. Entwicklung eines Hochschul-Rankingverfahrens mittels Mixed-Rasch-Modell und Mehrebenenanalyse am Beispiel der Psychologie , 2007 .
[26] Vincent Larivière,et al. Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases , 2006, Scientometrics.
[28] Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al. The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible , 2006, Scientometrics.
[29] Anton J. Nederhof,et al. Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review , 2006, Scientometrics.
[30] Michael Dinges. THE AUSTRIAN SCIENCE FUND: EX POST EVALUATION AND PERFORMANCE OF FWF FUNDED RESEARCH PROJECTS , 2005 .
[31] Charles Oppenheim,et al. The Evolution of the UK’s Research Assessment Exercise: Publications, Performance and Perceptions , 2005 .
[32] Paul Bourke,et al. Publication types, citation rates and evaluation , 1996, Scientometrics.
[33] Rolf A. Zwaan,et al. Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the humanities and the social and beha vioural sciences: A comparative study , 1989, Scientometrics.
[34] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. A bibliometric approach to social sciences. National research performances in 6 selected social science areas, 1990–1992 , 2005, Scientometrics.
[35] Diana Hicks,et al. The Four Literatures of Social Sciences , 2005 .
[36] Henk F. Moed,et al. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research , 2005 .
[37] Kathryn La Barre,et al. Mickey Mouse and Milton: book publishing in the humanities , 2004, Learn. Publ..
[38] Marcel Croon,et al. Estimating Latent Structure Models with Categorical Variables: One-Step Versus Three-Step Estimators , 2004, Political Analysis.
[39] J. Vermunt. Latent Class Models , 2004 .
[40] David Kaplan,et al. The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences , 2004 .
[41] D. Hicks. The Four Literatures of Social Science , 2004 .
[42] Tammo H. A. Bijmolt,et al. Country and Consumer Segmentation: Multi-Level Latent Class Analysis of Financial Product Ownership , 2004 .
[43] E. Govere,et al. Educational legislation in colonial Zimbabwe (1899-1979) , 2003 .
[44] Grant Lewison,et al. Beyond outputs: new measures of biomedical research impact , 2003, Aslib Proc..
[45] R. Mutz,et al. Forstliches Engagement und forstliches Engagementpotenzial von Privatwaldbesitzern in Nordrhein-Westfalen − Analyse auf der Basis des Mixed-Rasch-Modells , 2002, Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt vereinigt mit Tharandter forstliches Jahrbuch.
[46] Lisa A. Best,et al. Scientific Graphs and the Hierarchy of the Sciences: , 2000 .
[47] S. Hanney,et al. Evaluating the NHS research and development programme: will the programme give value for money? , 1998, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.
[48] H. Bozdogan. Choosing the Number of Component Clusters in the Mixture-Model Using a New Informational Complexity Criterion of the Inverse-Fisher Information Matrix , 1993 .
[49] Otto Opitz,et al. Information and Classification , 1993 .
[50] A. Nederhof. Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. , 1985 .