Quantifying Side Effects in Multistate Discrete Networks

Developing efficient computational methods to change the state of a cell from an undesirable condition, e.g. diseased, into a desirable, e.g. healthy, condition is an important goal of systems biology. The identification of potential interventions can be achieved through mathematical modeling of the state of a cell by finding appropriate input manipulations in the model that represent external interventions. This paper focuses on quantifying the unwanted or unplanned changes that come along with the application of an intervention to produce a desired effect, which we define as the \emph{side effects} of the intervention. The type of mathematical models that we will consider are discrete dynamical systems which include the widely used Boolean networks and their generalizations. The potential control targets can be represented by a set of nodes and edges that can be manipulated to produce a desired effect on the system. This paper presents practical tools along with applications for the analysis and control of multistate networks. The first result is a polynomial normal form representation for discrete functions that provides a partition of the inputs of the function into canalizing and non-canalizing variables and, within the canalizing ones, we categorize the input variables into layers of canalization. The second theoretical result is a set of formulas for counting the maximum number of transitions that will change in the state space upon an edge deletion in the wiring diagram. These formulas rely on the stratification of the inputs of the target function where the number of changed transitions depends on the layer of canalization that includes the input to be deleted. Applications from using these formulas to estimate the number of changes in the state space and comparisons with the actual number of changes are also presented.

[1]  C. Waddington,et al.  The strategy of the genes , 1957 .

[2]  S. Kauffman Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  R. Thomas,et al.  Dynamical behaviour of biological regulatory networks--II. Immunity control in bacteriophage lambda. , 1995, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[4]  Sui Huang Gene expression profiling, genetic networks, and cellular states: an integrating concept for tumorigenesis and drug discovery , 1999, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[5]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Random Boolean network models and the yeast transcriptional network , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  H. Othmer,et al.  The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  Q. Ouyang,et al.  The yeast cell-cycle network is robustly designed. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Genetic networks with canalyzing Boolean rules are always stable. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Steffen Klamt,et al.  A methodology for the structural and functional analysis of signaling and regulatory networks , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[10]  Aurélien Naldi,et al.  Logical modelling of regulatory networks with GINsim 2.3 , 2009, Biosyst..

[11]  Abdul Salam Jarrah,et al.  Polynomial algebra of discrete models in systems biology , 2010, Bioinform..

[12]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Probabilistic Boolean Networks - The Modeling and Control of Gene Regulatory Networks , 2010 .

[13]  R. Laubenbacher,et al.  Regulatory patterns in molecular interaction networks. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  Attractor Landscape Analysis Reveals Feedback Loops in the p53 Network That Control the Cellular Response to DNA Damage , 2012, Science Signaling.

[15]  R. Laubenbacher,et al.  The number of multistate nested canalyzing functions , 2011, 1108.0206.

[16]  Emmanuel Barillot,et al.  OCSANA: optimal combinations of interventions from network analysis , 2013, Bioinform..

[17]  J. Boissel,et al.  An in silico target identification using Boolean network attractors: Avoiding pathological phenotypes. , 2014, Comptes rendus biologies.

[18]  Tatsuya Akutsu,et al.  On control of singleton attractors in multiple Boolean networks: integer programming-based method , 2014, BMC Systems Biology.

[19]  Matthew Macauley,et al.  Stratification and enumeration of Boolean functions by canalizing depth , 2015, ArXiv.

[20]  David Murrugarra,et al.  Molecular network control through boolean canalization , 2015, EURASIP J. Bioinform. Syst. Biol..

[21]  Réka Albert,et al.  Cell Fate Reprogramming by Control of Intracellular Network Dynamics , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  É. Remy,et al.  A Modeling Approach to Explain Mutually Exclusive and Co-Occurring Genetic Alterations in Bladder Tumorigenesis. , 2015, Cancer research.

[23]  T. Chu,et al.  Controllability and observability of Boolean networks arising from biology. , 2015, Chaos.

[24]  Alan Veliz-Cuba,et al.  Identification of control targets in Boolean molecular network models via computational algebra , 2015, BMC Systems Biology.

[25]  Luis Mateus Rocha,et al.  Control of complex networks requires both structure and dynamics , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[26]  Seda Arat,et al.  Activated Oncogenic Pathway Modifies Iron Network in Breast Epithelial Cells: A Dynamic Modeling Perspective , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  Réka Albert,et al.  A network modeling approach to elucidate drug resistance mechanisms and predict combinatorial drug treatments in breast cancer , 2017, bioRxiv.

[28]  Gang Yang,et al.  Structure-based control of complex networks with nonlinear dynamics , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Yuan Li,et al.  Multistate nested canalizing functions and their networks , 2014, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[30]  Reinhard C. Laubenbacher,et al.  The innate immune response to ischemic injury: a multiscale modeling perspective , 2018, bioRxiv.

[31]  Colin Campbell,et al.  Edgetic perturbations to eliminate fixed-point attractors in Boolean regulatory networks. , 2019, Chaos.

[32]  J. McDowell,et al.  PlantSimLab - a modeling and simulation web tool for plant biologists , 2019, BMC Bioinformatics.