ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 THE HALO MERGER RATE IN THE MILLENNIUM SIMULATION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR OBSERVED GALAXY MERGER FRACTIONS

We have developed a new method to extract halo merger rates from the Millennium Simulation. First, by removing superfluous mergers that are artifacts of the standard friends-of-friends (FOF) halo identification algorithm, we find a lower merger rate compared to previous work. The reductions are more significant at lower redshifts and lower halo masses, and especially for minor mergers. Our new approach results in a better agreement with predictions from the extended Press-Schechter model. Second, we find that the FOF halo finder overestimates the halo mass by up to 50% for halos that are about to merge, which leads to an additional 20% overestimate of the merger rate. Therefore, we define halo masses by including only particles that are gravitationally bound to their FOF groups. We provide new best-fitting parameters for a global formula to account for these improvements. In addition, we extract the merger rate per progenitor halo, as well as per descendant halo. The merger rate per progenitor halo is the quantity that should be related to observed galaxy merger fractions when they are measured via pair counting. At low-mass/redshift, the merger rate increases moderately with mass and steeply with redshift. At high enough mass/redshift (for the rarest halos with masses a few times the knee of the mass function), these trends break down, and the merger rate per progenitor halo decreases with mass and increases only moderately with redshift. Defining the merger rate per progenitor halo also allows us to quantify the rate at which halos are being accreted onto larger halos, in addition to the minor and major merger rates. We provide an analytic formula that converts any given merger rate per descendant halo into a merger rate per progenitor halo. Finally, we perform a direct comparison between observed merger fractions and the fraction of halos in the Millennium Simulation that have undergone a major merger during the recent dynamical friction time, and find a fair agreement, within the large uncertainties of the observations. Our new halo merger trees are available at http://www.mpe.mpg.de/ir/MillenniumMergerTrees/.

[1]  B. J. Weiner,et al.  accepted to the Astrophysical Journal Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 THE EVOLUTION OF GALAXY MERGERS AND MORPHOLOGY AT Z < 1.2 IN THE EXTENDED GROTH STRIP , 2007 .

[2]  G. Lucia,et al.  The hierarchical formation of the brightest cluster galaxies , 2006, astro-ph/0606519.

[3]  Onsi Fakhouri,et al.  The nearly universal merger rate of dark matter haloes in ΛCDM cosmology , 2007, 0710.4567.

[4]  D. Patton,et al.  Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 THE LUMINOSITY DEPENDENCE OF THE GALAXY MERGER RATE , 2022 .

[5]  G. Efstathiou,et al.  The evolution of large-scale structure in a universe dominated by cold dark matter , 1985 .

[6]  Carlos S. Frenk,et al.  The large-scale structure of the Universe , 2006, Nature.

[7]  L. Hernquist,et al.  Gasdynamics and starbursts in major mergers , 1995, astro-ph/9512099.

[8]  Jun Zhang,et al.  How to grow a healthy merger tree , 2008, 0805.1230.

[9]  C. Conselice,et al.  The structures of distant galaxies – I. Galaxy structures and the merger rate to z∼ 3 in the Hubble Ultra-Deep Field , 2007, 0711.2333.

[10]  J. Silk,et al.  Galaxy Mergers at z ≳ 1 in the HUDF: Evidence for a Peak in the Major Merger Rate of Massive Galaxies , 2007, 0712.0416.

[11]  Shaun Cole,et al.  Merger rates in hierarchical models of galaxy formation – II. Comparison with N-body simulations , 1994 .

[12]  A. Mazure,et al.  The VIMOS VLT Deep Survey - Evolution of the major merger rate since z ~ 1 from spectroscopically confirmed galaxy pairs , 2008, 0807.2578.

[13]  A marked correlation function analysis of halo formation times in the Millennium Simulation , 2005, astro-ph/0510488.

[14]  M. Kitzbichler,et al.  A calibration of the relation between the abundance of close galaxy pairs and the rate of galaxy mergers , 2008, 0804.1965.

[15]  Chien Y. Peng,et al.  Dry Mergers in GEMS: The Dynamical Evolution of Massive Early-Type Galaxies , 2005, astro-ph/0506425.

[16]  T. Naab,et al.  The influence of gas on the structure of merger remnants , 2006, astro-ph/0605155.

[17]  S. White,et al.  Galaxy growth in the concordance ΛCDM cosmology , 2007, 0708.1814.

[18]  Galaxy mergers with various mass ratios: properties of remnants , 2005, astro-ph/0503189.

[19]  M. Mapelli,et al.  Merger and ring galaxy formation rates at z≤ 2 , 2008, 0803.0545.

[20]  E. Quataert,et al.  Dynamical friction and galaxy merging time-scales , 2007, 0707.2960.

[21]  H. M. P. Couchman,et al.  The mass function of dark matter haloes , 2000, astro-ph/0005260.

[22]  Casey Papovich,et al.  A Direct Measurement of Major Galaxy Mergers at z 3 , 2003 .

[23]  M. Rees,et al.  Core condensation in heavy halos: a two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering , 1978 .

[24]  J. Peacock,et al.  Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars , 2005, Nature.

[25]  S. Phleps,et al.  The Merger Rate of Massive Galaxies , 2006, astro-ph/0602038.

[26]  G. Cresci,et al.  ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION IN APJ Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 11/26/04 MERGERS AND MASS ACCRETION RATES IN GALAXY ASSEMBLY: THE MILLENNIUM SIMULATION COMPARED TO OBSERVATIONS OF z ≈ 2 GALAXIES , 2022 .

[27]  S. Cole,et al.  Merger rates in hierarchical models of galaxy formation , 1993 .

[28]  Katrin Heitmann,et al.  The Halo Mass Function: High-Redshift Evolution and Universality , 2007, astro-ph/0702360.

[29]  P. Hopkins,et al.  A Cosmological Framework for the Co-Evolution of Quasars, Supermassive Black Holes, and Elliptical Galaxies. II. Formation of Red Ellipticals , 2007, 0706.1246.

[30]  L. Hernquist,et al.  Dynamics of Interacting Galaxies , 1992 .

[31]  L. Hernquist Tidal triggering of starbursts and nuclear activity in galaxies , 1989, Nature.

[32]  R. Davé,et al.  Galaxy Merger Statistics and Inferred Bulge-to-Disk Ratios in Cosmological SPH Simulations , 2005, astro-ph/0509474.

[33]  A. Dekel,et al.  Merger rates of dark matter haloes , 2008, 0802.0198.

[34]  B. Tinsley,et al.  Evolution of galaxies and stellar populations , 1977 .

[35]  B. Tinsley,et al.  The Evolution of galaxies and stellar populations : conference at Yale University, May 19-21, 1977 , 1977 .

[36]  UCOLick,et al.  The Redshift Evolution of Wet, Dry, and Mixed Galaxy Mergers from Close Galaxy Pairs in the DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey , 2008, 0802.3004.

[37]  J. R. Bond,et al.  Excursion set mass functions for hierarchical Gaussian fluctuations , 1991 .

[38]  Mimi Zhang,et al.  Multimass schemes for collisionless N‐body simulations , 2007, 0711.2756.

[39]  J. Brinchmann,et al.  Hubble Space Telescope imaging of the CFRS and LDSS redshift surveys—IV. Influence of mergers in the evolution of faint field galaxies from z∼1 , 1999, astro-ph/9909211.

[40]  R. Carlberg,et al.  Close Pairs of Field Galaxies in the CNOC1 Redshift Survey , 1996, astro-ph/9608016.

[41]  H. J. Mo,et al.  The abundance and clustering of dark haloes in the standard ΛCDM cosmogony , 2002 .

[42]  A. Helmi,et al.  THE UNORTHODOX ORBITS OF SUBSTRUCTURE HALOS , 2008, 0801.1127.

[43]  O. Fakhouri,et al.  Environmental dependence of dark matter halo growth – I. Halo merger rates , 2008, 0808.2471.

[44]  T. Naab,et al.  Statistical Properties of Collisionless Equal- and Unequal-Mass Merger Remnants of Disk Galaxies , 2001, astro-ph/0110179.

[45]  Katrin Heitmann,et al.  THE STRUCTURE OF HALOS: IMPLICATIONS FOR GROUP AND CLUSTER COSMOLOGY , 2008, 0803.3624.

[46]  A. Dekel,et al.  Constructing merger trees that mimic N-body simulations , 2007, 0708.1599.

[47]  Martin White The Mass of a halo , 2001 .

[48]  Galaxy formation using halo merger histories taken from N‐body simulations , 2002, astro-ph/0210141.

[49]  Joel R. Primack,et al.  Formation of galaxies and large-scale structure with cold dark matter , 1984, Nature.

[50]  Christopher J. Conselice,et al.  Early and Rapid Merging as a Formation Mechanism of Massive Galaxies: Empirical Constraints , 2005, astro-ph/0507146.

[51]  C. Conselice,et al.  The Millennium Galaxy Catalogue: The Connection between Close Pairs and Asymmetry; Implications for the Galaxy Merger Rate , 2007, 0705.2528.

[52]  New Techniques for Relating Dynamically Close Galaxy Pairs to Merger and Accretion Rates: Application to the Second Southern Sky Redshift Survey , 2000, astro-ph/0001364.

[53]  William H. Press,et al.  Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Condensation , 1974 .

[54]  Kyle R. Stewart,et al.  Merger Histories of Galaxy Halos and Implications for Disk Survival , 2007, 0711.5027.

[55]  C. Conselice,et al.  A comparison of galaxy merger history observations and predictions from semi-analytic models , 2009, 0904.2365.

[56]  M. White,et al.  The clustering and host haloes of galaxy mergers at high redshift , 2008, 0810.3650.

[57]  R. Bower The evolution of groups of galaxies in the Press-Schechter formalism , 1991 .

[58]  G. Efstathiou,et al.  The formation of dark halos in a universe dominated by cold dark matter , 1988 .