The mediating effect of group development on satisfaction in a virtual and mixed-mode environment

This study explores the mediating effect of two aspects of group development (workgroup cohesion and conflict management) on five aspects of satisfaction (solution satisfaction, solution confidence, interaction process satisfaction, perceived decision quality, and level of teamwork). The independent variable, interaction mode, has two treatments: mixed-mode, a combination of face-to-face (FtF) and computer-mediated communication (CMC), and pure CMC (no FtF interaction). Members of mixed-mode groups rated their groups higher in terms of cohesiveness, the ability to manage conflict, and all aspects of satisfaction. Members of more highly developed groups rated themselves higher on all satisfaction variables compared to members of lesser-developed groups. Findings indicate that workgroup cohesion mediated all satisfaction variables, while conflict management mediated all satisfaction variables except for solution confidence.

[1]  D. Tannen Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse , 1989 .

[2]  Vinod Goel,et al.  Motivating the Notion of Generic Design within Information-Processing Theory: The Design Problem Space , 1989, AI Mag..

[3]  A. Greenwald The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. , 1980 .

[4]  Robert C. Davis,et al.  The Achieving Society , 1962 .

[5]  Rosalie J. Ocker,et al.  Web-based computer-mediated communication: an experimental investigation comparing three communication modes for determining software requirements , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  Dennis S. Gouran,et al.  Behavioral correlates of perceptions of quality in decision‐making discussions , 1978 .

[7]  R. Felson The effect of self-appraisals of ability on academic performance. , 1984 .

[8]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Group Decision Support Systems on Group Development , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  R. Bales Interaction process analysis , 1976 .

[10]  C. Gersick Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[11]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The Effects of Distributed Group Support and Process Structuring on Software Requirements Development Teams: Results on Creativity and Quality , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  John K. Hemphill,et al.  Group dimensions : a manual for their measurement , 1956 .

[14]  A. Bandura,et al.  Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. , 1991 .

[15]  I. Janis Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[16]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group decision making and communication technology , 1992 .

[17]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A causal model of organizational commitment in a military training environment , 1988 .

[18]  B. E. Wynne,et al.  The Implications of Group Development and History for Group Support System Theory and Practice , 1992 .

[19]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Technology: The New Media in Society , 1986 .

[20]  S. Green,et al.  The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process , 1980 .

[21]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[22]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Group Development (II): Implications for GSS Research and Practice , 1997 .

[23]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1997, HICSS 2015.

[24]  J. Goldberg Interrupting the discourse on interruptions , 1990 .

[25]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Groupwork close up: a comparison of the group design process with and without a simple group editor , 1993, TOIS.

[27]  R. Daft,et al.  Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations , 1987 .

[28]  Robert Davison,et al.  An instrument for measuring meeting success , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[29]  L. Festinger Informal social communication. , 1950, Psychological review.

[30]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Effects of Four Modes of Group Communication on the Outcomes of Software Requirements Determination , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychology Review.

[32]  W. Bennis,et al.  A Theory of Group Development , 1956 .

[33]  C. Alderfer Existence, Relatedness, and Growth; Human Needs in Organizational Settings , 1972 .

[34]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[35]  R. Bostrom,et al.  Group Development (I): A Review and Synthesis of Development Models , 1997 .

[36]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Communication and performance in ad hoc task groups , 1990 .

[38]  M. Lynn Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1996 .

[39]  J. McGrath Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[40]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[41]  M. Riggs,et al.  The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes: a causal model. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[42]  Jolene Galegher Intellectual Teamwork and Information Technology: the role of information systems in collaborative i , 1990 .

[43]  J. McGrath,et al.  The Social Psychology of Time: New Perspectives , 1988 .

[44]  HiltzStarr Roxanne,et al.  The effects of distributed group support and process structuring on software requirements development teams , 1995 .

[45]  Jolene Galegher,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication for Intellectual Teamwork: An Experiment in Group Writing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[46]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Managerial Attitudes and Performance. , 1969 .

[47]  E. Goffman Interaction Ritual. Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. London (Allen Lane) 1967. , 1967 .

[48]  J. McGrath Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[49]  C. Gersick MARKING TIME: PREDICTABLE TRANSITIONS IN TASK GROUPS , 1989 .