Sensory Substitution: Using a Vibrotactile Device to Orient and Walk to Targets

This study investigates how active exploration helps users of sensory substitution devices (SSDs) to detect action-relevant information. A vibrotactile SSD was developed that generates stimulation that is contingent on the users’ movements. Target direction was specified by the location of the vibratory stimulation, and target distance by the size and intensity of the pattern of stimulation. A series of experiments was performed with blindfolded participants. In Experiments 1a to 1c, participants used the SSD to align their central body axis with prespecified targets. These experiments differed in the number of actuators that were used and whether online perception–action coupling was present. In Experiment 2, participants approached targets with forward locomotion along a straight line. Experiment 3 combined the previous experiments and studied the concomitant walking and steering toward targets. Oscillatory movements, which facilitated information pickup, were observed in all experiments. The exploratory oscillations were shown to depend on the online perception–action coupling and were related to cases of hyperacuity, for which absolute errors were found to be smaller than the areas of sensitivity of the actuators. It is concluded that, to improve the utility of SSDs, future research with SSDs should pay more attention to the role of active information detection.

[1]  S Weinstein,et al.  Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex, and laterality , 1968 .

[2]  M T Turvey,et al.  Haptically perceiving the distances reachable with hand-held objects. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Lynette A. Jones,et al.  Tactile Displays: Guidance for Their Design and Application , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[4]  S. Adamovich,et al.  Pointing in 3D space to remembered targets. I. Kinesthetic versus visual target presentation. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Behavioral dynamics of steering, obstacle avoidance, and route selection. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  The Body Surface as a Communication System: The State of the Art after 50 Years , 2007, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[7]  Fernando Bermejo,et al.  Sensorimotor strategies for recognizing geometrical shapes: a comparative study with different sensory substitution devices , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[8]  D. Pascolini,et al.  Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010 , 2011, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[9]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  A wearable system for mobility improvement of visually impaired people , 2007, The Visual Computer.

[10]  G Jansson,et al.  Tactile guidance of movement. , 1983, The International journal of neuroscience.

[11]  Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al.  Monocular Egocentric Distance Information Generated by Head Movement , 1994 .

[12]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Learning to Perceive with a Visuo — Auditory Substitution System: Localisation and Object Recognition with ‘The Voice’ , 2007, Perception.

[13]  J. Tresilian Visually timed action: time-out for ‘tau’? , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Antonio Barrientos,et al.  Action-contingent vibrotactile flow facilitates the detection of ground level obstacles with a partly virtual sensory substitution device. , 2012, Human movement science.

[15]  Guillaume Rao,et al.  Optic variables used to judge future ball arrival position in expert and novice soccer players , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[16]  David M Jacobs,et al.  Lateral interception II: predicting hand movements. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Gilles Montagne,et al.  Environmental constraints modify the way an interceptive action is controlled , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Frank Ai Geldard Cutaneous coding of optical signals: the optohapt , 1966 .

[19]  J. C. Bliss,et al.  A direct translation reading aid for the blind , 1966 .

[20]  Jeanny Hérault,et al.  Visuo-auditory sensory substitution for mobility assistance: testing TheVIBE , 2008 .

[21]  Reinoud J Bootsma,et al.  Global and Local Contributions to the Optical Specification of Time to Contact: Observer Sensitivity to Composite Tau , 2002, Perception.

[22]  Julien Bastin,et al.  Testing the role of expansion in the prospective control of locomotion , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  Paul Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Seeing with the Brain , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[24]  S. Runeson Psychophysics: The failure of an elementaristic dream , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  James C. Craig,et al.  Vibrotactile letter recognition: The effects of a ma king stimulus , 1976 .

[26]  C. Bourdin,et al.  Revisited: the inertia tensor as a proprioceptive invariant in humans , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[27]  Charles Spence,et al.  The skin as a medium for sensory substitution. , 2014, Multisensory research.

[28]  R. Klatzky,et al.  - Sensory Substitution of Vision: Importance of Perceptual and Cognitive Processing , 2018, Assistive Technology for Blindness and Low Vision.

[29]  M. Turvey Dynamic touch. , 1996, The American psychologist.

[30]  C. Lenay,et al.  SENSORY SUBSTITUTION: LIMITS AND PERSPECTIVES , 2003 .

[31]  G Guarniero,et al.  Experience of Tactile Vision , 1974, Perception.

[32]  David N. Lee,et al.  Plummeting gannets: a paradigm of ecological optics , 1981, Nature.

[33]  Hendrik A. H. C. van Veen,et al.  Waypoint navigation with a vibrotactile waist belt , 2005, TAP.

[34]  Yon Visell,et al.  Tactile sensory substitution: Models for enaction in HCI , 2009, Interact. Comput..

[35]  David Travieso,et al.  Stepping on Obstacles with a Sensory Substitution Device on the Lower Leg: Practice without Vision Is More Beneficial than Practice with Vision , 2014, PloS one.

[36]  S. Runeson On the possibility of "smart" perceptual mechanisms. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[37]  SpenceCharles,et al.  The body surface as a communication system , 2007 .

[38]  J. Loomis,et al.  Visual space perception and visually directed action. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  Lucy E. Dunne,et al.  Tactile distance feedback for firefighters: design and preliminary evaluation of a sensory augmentation glove , 2013, AH.

[40]  Marion Hersh,et al.  Assistive Technology for Visually Impaired and Blind People , 2008 .

[41]  D. M. Jacobs,et al.  Body-scaled affordances in sensory substitution , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.

[42]  Leslie Pack Kaelbling,et al.  A Dynamical Model of Visually-Guided Steering, Obstacle Avoidance, and Route Selection , 2003, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[43]  Antonio Barrientos,et al.  Tactile-Sight: A Sensory Substitution Device Based on Distance-Related Vibrotactile Flow , 2013 .

[44]  Koji Tsukada,et al.  ActiveBelt: Belt-Type Wearable Tactile Display for Directional Navigation , 2004, UbiComp.

[45]  J. Bastin,et al.  Prospective strategies underlie the control of interceptive actions. , 2006, Human movement science.

[46]  Elise Faugloire,et al.  Evaluation of heading performance with vibrotactile guidance: the benefits of information-movement coupling compared with spatial language. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[47]  M T Turvey,et al.  Effects of intention and learning on attention to information in dynamic touch , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[48]  M. Alexander,et al.  Principles of Neural Science , 1981 .

[49]  Richard Siegesmund Learning to Perceive , 2017 .

[50]  BENJAMIN WHITE,et al.  Vision Substitution by Tactile Image Projection , 1969, Nature.

[51]  R W Cholewiak,et al.  The generation of vibrotactile patterns on a linear array: Influences of body site, time, and presentation mode , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  Paul Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Brain plasticity: ‘visual’ acuity of blind persons via the tongue , 2001, Brain Research.

[53]  Cristy Ho,et al.  Dynamic vibrotactile warning signals for frontal collision avoidance: towards the torso versus towards the head , 2015, Ergonomics.

[54]  Nikolaos G. Bourbakis,et al.  Wearable Obstacle Avoidance Electronic Travel Aids for Blind: A Survey , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).