Videos of Things: Speculating on, Anticipating and Synthesizing Technological Mediations

In this paper we present Videos of Things: videos that portray the mediated, lived world of computational artifacts informed by postphenomenology. In a post-phenomenological understanding, things and us are interdependent in that they mutually shape each other. And as a whole, technology or designed things mediate the relations between our world and us. This can be a challenge for designers. Through the making of design videos, we explored narrative strategies for creating stories featuring technological mediation. These include humanness, patterns in time, and non-human ensembles. We reflect on how the videos at different stages of the design process have helped to a) speculate on technological mediated relationships, b) synthesize and reflect on qualitative data on technological mediation and c) anticipate technological mediation. The paper contributes different narrative strategies for design videos and the role these videos can play within a design process aimed at elaborating the mediated qualities of technologies.

[1]  Giulio Jacucci,et al.  On the move with a magic thing: role playing in concept design of mobile services and devices , 2000, DIS '00.

[2]  David B. Wilson,et al.  Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry by Albert Borgmann (review) , 1986 .

[3]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1995 .

[4]  Albert Borgmann Review of Peter-Paul Verbeek's What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design , 2005 .

[5]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Unselfconscious Interaction: A Conceptual Construct , 2016, Interact. Comput..

[6]  William Odom,et al.  Understanding Long-Term Interactions with a Slow Technology: an Investigation of Experiences with FutureMe , 2015, CHI.

[7]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  A behavior model for persuasive design , 2009, Persuasive '09.

[8]  Paul Hekkert,et al.  Design for Socially Responsible Behavior: A Classification of Influence Based on Intended User Experience , 2011, Design Issues.

[9]  Mika Pantzar,et al.  The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes , 2012 .

[10]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  The drift table: designing for ludic engagement , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[11]  Miguel Bruns Alonso,et al.  Lyssna: A Design Fiction to Reframe Food Waste , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[12]  Kenneth McKenzie Clark,et al.  The other half , 1977 .

[13]  A. Bruni,et al.  Reassembling the Social—An Introduction to Actor Network Theory , 2007 .

[14]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates are Running the Asylum , 1999, Software-Ergonomie.

[15]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity (2nd Edition) , 1999 .

[16]  Peter-Paul Verbeek,et al.  Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things , 2011 .

[17]  Henry Lin,et al.  Material speculation: actual artifacts for critical inquiry , 2015, Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives.

[18]  D. Ihde Technology and the lifeworld : from garden to earth , 1991 .

[19]  Robert Rosenberger,et al.  Postphenomenological Investigations: Essays on Human-Technology Relations , 2015 .

[20]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming , 2013 .

[21]  Lene Nielsen,et al.  From user to character: an investigation into user-descriptions in scenarios , 2002, DIS '02.

[22]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Intersecting with Unaware Objects , 2015, Creativity & Cognition.

[23]  Paul Mclnerney Book Review: Scenario-Based Design Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development, by John Carroll and John Wiley , 1996, SGCH.

[24]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Contravision: exploring users' reactions to futuristic technology , 2010, CHI.

[25]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  The resourcefulness of everyday design , 2007, C&C '07.

[26]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Design documentaries: inspiring design research through documentary film , 2006, DIS '06.

[27]  Chris Speed,et al.  Thing Ethnography: Doing Design Research with Non-Humans , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[28]  P. Verbeek What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design , 2005 .

[29]  Steve Benford,et al.  Ambiguity as a resource for design , 2003, CHI '03.

[30]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Alternatives: exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals , 2000, CHI.

[31]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Manifestations of everyday design: guiding goals and motivations , 2013, Creativity & Cognition.

[32]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Personas: practice and theory , 2003, DUX '03.

[33]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1995 .

[34]  Mark Blythe Practical products for centenarian spies , 2015, Interactions.

[35]  T.M. Duffy,et al.  Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development [Book Review] , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[36]  Johan Redström,et al.  Materializing infrastructures for participatory hacking , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[37]  Johan Redström,et al.  Form and the computational object , 2005, Digit. Creativity.

[38]  Daniel Fallman,et al.  The new good: exploring the potential of philosophy of technology to contribute to human-computer interaction , 2011, CHI.

[39]  William W. Gaver Cultural commentators: Non-native interpretations as resources for polyphonic assessment , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[40]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Unselfconscious interaction: a conceptual construct. Interacting with Computers , 2015 .

[41]  Albert Borgmann,et al.  Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry. , 1986 .

[42]  Stephen Lindsay,et al.  Invisible design: exploring insights and ideas through ambiguous film scenarios , 2012, DIS '12.

[43]  Gabrielle Durepos Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .