Updated global SMEFT fit to Higgs, diboson and electroweak data
暂无分享,去创建一个
John Ellis | Tevong You | J. Ellis | T. You | V. Sanz | C. Murphy | Christopher W. Murphy | Ver'onica Sanz
[1] Jason Aebischer,et al. Matching of gauge invariant dimension 6 operators for b to s and b to c transitions , 2016 .
[2] A. Manohar. An exactly solvable model for dimension-six Higgs operators and h→γγ , 2013, 1305.3927.
[3] Christophe Grojean,et al. A global view on the Higgs self-coupling , 2017, 1704.01953.
[4] Atlas Collaboration. Search for the Dimuon Decay of the Higgs Boson in pp Collisions at s =13 TeV with the ATLAS Detector , 2017, 1705.04582.
[5] G. Passarino,et al. Low energy behaviour of standard model extensions , 2016, 1603.03660.
[6] Hayes,et al. Review of Particle Physics. , 1996, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.
[7] Takeuchi,et al. Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections. , 1992, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.
[8] H. Murayama,et al. Operator bases, S-matrices, and their partition functions , 2017, 1706.08520.
[9] Tevong You,et al. Extending the Universal One-Loop Effective Action: heavy-light coefficients , 2017, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[10] A. Falkowski,et al. Future DUNE constraints on EFT , 2018, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[11] M. Pierini,et al. The Global Electroweak and Higgs Fits in the LHC era , 2017, 1710.05402.
[12] Zhenyu Han,et al. Effective theory analysis of precision electroweak data , 2004, hep-ph/0412166.
[13] Minho Son,et al. Combined analysis of double Higgs production via gluon fusion at the HL-LHC in the effective field theory approach , 2018, Physical Review D.
[14] T. Plehn,et al. LHC multijet events as a probe for anomalous dimension-six gluon interactions , 2016, 1611.00767.
[15] D. C. Kennedy,et al. Electroweak radiative corrections with an effective lagrangian: Four-fermions processes , 1989 .
[16] 野村栄一,et al. 2 , 1900, The Hatak Witches.
[17] A. Pomarol,et al. Renormalization of dimension-six operators relevant for the Higgs decays h → γγ, γZ , 2013, 1302.5661.
[18] Jason Aebischer,et al. Matching of gauge invariant dimension-six operators for b → s and b → c transitions , 2015, 1512.02830.
[19] Adam Martin,et al. Low-derivative operators of the Standard Model effective field theory via Hilbert series methods , 2015, 1510.00372.
[20] A. Falkowski. Effective field theory approach to LHC Higgs data , 2015, 1505.00046.
[21] H. Schulz,et al. Higgs coupling measurements at the LHC , 2015, 1511.05170.
[22] T. Dorigo. Hadron Collider Searches for Diboson Resonances , 2018, 1802.00354.
[23] Christophe Delaere,et al. Measurement of W-pair production in e(+)e(-) collisions at centre-of-mass energies from 183 to 209 GeV , 2004 .
[24] R. T. Roberts,et al. Evidence for the associated production of the Higgs boson and a top quark pair with the ATLAS detector , 2017, 1712.08891.
[25] B. Trocmé,et al. Measurement of W-pair production in e + e − collisions at centre-of-mass energies from 183 to 209 GeV , 2017 .
[26] Z. Kunszt,et al. One-loop effective lagrangians after matching , 2016, 1602.00126.
[27] Chanyong Park,et al. Spiky Strings on AdS$_4 \times {\bf CP}^3$ , 2008 .
[28] Michael Trott,et al. Renormalization group evolution of the Standard Model dimension six operators II: Yukawa dependence , 2013, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[29] M. Mühlleitner,et al. The measurement of the Higgs self-coupling at the LHC: theoretical status , 2012, 1212.5581.
[30] H. Murayama,et al. What do precision Higgs measurements buy us , 2014, 1404.1058.
[32] S. Dawson,et al. Standard Model EFT and Extended Scalar Sectors , 2017, 1704.07851.
[33] Cms Collaborations. Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC $pp$ collision data at $\sqrt{s}=$ 7 and 8 TeV , 2016 .
[34] John Ellis,et al. The universal one-loop effective action , 2015, 1512.03003.
[35] S. Y. Shim,et al. Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector , 2016 .
[36] Michael Trott,et al. The SMEFTsim package, theory and tools , 2017, 1709.06492.
[37] V. Sanz,et al. Limits on anomalous couplings of the Higgs boson to electroweak gauge bosons from LEP and the LHC , 2012, 1211.1320.
[38] J. Santiago,et al. Effective description of general extensions of the Standard Model: the complete tree-level dictionary , 2017, 1711.10391.
[39] G. P. Yeh,et al. Combination of CDF and D0 W-Boson mass measurements , 2013, 1307.7627.
[40] On gauge invariance and minimal coupling , 2013, 1305.0017.
[41] M. Trott,et al. Higgs Decay to Two Photons at One Loop in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory. , 2015, Physical review letters.
[42] O. Eberhardt,et al. Update of global Two-Higgs-Doublet model fits , 2017, 1711.02095.
[43] A. Falkowski,et al. Compilation of low-energy constraints on 4-fermion operators in the SMEFT , 2017, 1706.03783.
[44] I. Brivio. Scheming in the SMEFT , 2017, 1710.01003.
[45] J. Haller,et al. Update of the global electroweak fit and constraints on two-Higgs-doublet models , 2018, The European Physical Journal C.
[46] V. M. Ghete,et al. Inclusive Search for a Highly Boosted Higgs Boson Decaying to a Bottom Quark-Antiquark Pair. , 2018, Physical review letters.
[47] Francesco Riva,et al. Model-independent precision constraints on dimension-6 operators , 2014, 1411.0669.
[48] M. Pierini,et al. Electroweak precision constraints at present and future colliders , 2016, 1611.05354.
[49] Michael Trott,et al. Renormalization group evolution of the Standard Model dimension six operators III: gauge coupling dependence and phenomenology , 2013, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[50] H. Murayama,et al. Hilbert series and operator bases with derivatives in effective field theories , 2015, 1507.07240.
[51] Bruce Yabsley,et al. Search for the standard model Higgs boson produced in association with top quarks and decaying into a bb¯ pair in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , 2018 .
[52] P. Stoffer,et al. Low-energy effective field theory below the electroweak scale: operators and matching , 2017, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[53] Minho Son,et al. Anomalous triple gauge couplings in the effective field theory approach at the LHC , 2016, 1609.06312.
[54] Rodrigo Alonso,et al. Renormalization group evolution of dimension-six baryon number violating operators , 2014, 1405.0486.
[55] G. Altarelli,et al. Vacuum polarization effects of new physics on electroweak processes , 1991 .
[56] The Aleph Collaboration,et al. Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance , 2005, hep-ex/0509008.
[57] C. Murphy. Statistical approach to Higgs boson couplings in the standard model effective field theory , 2017, 1710.02008.
[58] V. M. Ghete,et al. Evidence for the Higgs boson decay to a bottom quark–antiquark pair , 2018 .
[59] Christophe Grojean,et al. On the validity of the effective field theory approach to SM precision tests , 2016, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[60] Dana Z. Anderson,et al. Search for ttH production in the H→bb decay channel with leptonic tt decays in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV , 2019 .
[61] T. Corbett,et al. Determining triple gauge boson couplings from Higgs data. , 2013, Physical review letters.
[62] J. Romão,et al. Higgs EFT for 2HDM and beyond , 2016, The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields.
[63] J. Terning,et al. Large corrections to electroweak parameters in technicolor theories , 1990 .
[64] A. Falkowski,et al. Model independent constraints on four-lepton operators , 2015, 1511.07434.
[65] Atlas Publications. Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and coupling strengths using pp collision data at √ s = 7 and 8 TeV in the ATLAS experiment , 2015 .
[66] J. Brehmer,et al. Better Higgs-CP Tests Through Information Geometry , 2017, 1712.02350.
[67] C. Hays,et al. Constraining EFT parameters using simplified template cross sections , 2017 .
[68] Hitoshi Murayama,et al. One-loop matching and running with covariant derivative expansion , 2016, 1604.01019.
[69] Veronica Sanz,et al. The effective Standard Model after LHC Run I , 2014, 1410.7703.
[70] D. Wyler,et al. Effective lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavour conservation , 1986 .
[71] I. Brivio,et al. The standard model as an effective field theory , 2017, Physics Reports.
[72] H. Murayama,et al. How to use the Standard Model effective field theory , 2014, 1412.1837.
[73] L. Randall,et al. Radiative corrections to electroweak parameters in technicolor theories , 1991 .
[74] E. Massó. An effective guide to beyond the Standard Model physics , 2014, 1406.6376.
[75] Zhen Liu,et al. A global view on the Higgs self-coupling at lepton colliders , 2017, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[76] A. Randle-conde,et al. Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC pp collision data at √s = 7 and 8 TeV , 2016 .
[77] Francesco Riva,et al. Towards the ultimate SM fit to close in on Higgs physics , 2013, 1308.2803.
[78] O. Eberhardt,et al. Next-to-leading order unitarity fits in Two-Higgs-Doublet models with soft ℤ2 breaking , 2016, 1609.01290.
[79] Peter Stoffer,et al. Low-energy effective field theory below the electroweak scale: anomalous dimensions , 2017, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[80] M. Trott,et al. The Z decay width in the SMEFT: yt and λ corrections at one loop , 2016, 1611.09879.
[81] M. Misiak,et al. Dimension-six terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian , 2010, 1008.4884.
[82] Nils Lavesson,et al. Extending CKKW-merging to One-Loop Matrix Elements , 2008, 0811.2912.
[83] V. M. Ghete,et al. Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying into the four-lepton final state in pp collisions at s=13$$ \sqrt{s}=13 $$ TeV , 2017, 1706.09936.
[84] Michael Trott,et al. Renormalization group scaling of Higgs operators and h → γγ decay , 2013, 1301.2588.
[85] O. Eberhardt,et al. Current and future constraints on Higgs couplings in the nonlinear Effective Theory , 2018, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[86] A. Pomarol,et al. Higgs windows to new physics through d = 6 operators: constraints and one-loop anomalous dimensions , 2013, 1308.1879.
[87] Nicola De Filippis,et al. Electroweak measurements in electron positron collisions at W-boson-pair energies at LEP , 2013 .
[88] J. Ellis,et al. Complete Higgs sector constraints on dimension-6 operators , 2014, 1404.3667.
[89] J. Gunion,et al. Scrutinizing the alignment limit in two-Higgs-doublet models: m h = 125 GeV , 2015, 1507.00933.
[90] Tilman Plehn,et al. The gauge-Higgs legacy of the LHC Run I , 2016 .
[91] C. Grojean,et al. The Strongly-Interacting Light Higgs , 2007, hep-ph/0703164.
[92] Landon Lehman,et al. Extending the Standard Model Effective Field Theory with the Complete Set of Dimension-7 Operators , 2014, 1410.4193.
[93] J. Rademacker,et al. Review of Multibody Charm Analyses , 2016 .
[94] B. Fuks,et al. Phenomenology of the Higgs effective Lagrangian via FeynRules , 2013, 1310.5150.
[95] T. Corbett,et al. Robust Determination of the Higgs Couplings: Power to the Data , 2012, 1211.4580.
[96] M. Bjørn,et al. Incorporating doubly resonant W± data in a global fit of SMEFT parameters to lift flat directions , 2016, 1606.06693.
[97] B. Grinstein,et al. Operator analysis for precision electroweak physics , 1991 .
[98] T. Plehn,et al. The Higgs legacy of the LHC Run I , 2015, 1505.05516.
[99] Zhengkang Zhang,et al. Covariant diagrams for one-loop matching , 2016, 1610.00710.
[100] S. Fichet,et al. A Bayesian view of the Higgs sector with higher dimensional operators , 2013, 1304.3369.
[101] Adam Martin,et al. Hilbert Series for Constructing Lagrangians: expanding the phenomenologist's toolbox , 2015, 1503.07537.
[102] Kentarou Mawatari,et al. Rosetta: an operator basis translator for standard model effective field theory , 2015, The European Physical Journal C.
[103] S. Dawson,et al. Higgs decays to $ZZ$ and $Z\gamma$ in the standard model effective field theory: An NLO analysis , 2018 .
[104] G. Passarino,et al. The Standard Model Effective Field Theory and Next to Leading Order , 2016, 1610.08356.
[105] A. Pomarol,et al. BSM Primary effects , 2014, DIS 2014.
[106] S. Willenbrock,et al. Effective Field Theory Beyond the Standard Model , 2014, 1401.0470.
[107] A. Falkowski,et al. Global Constraints on Anomalous Triple Gauge Couplings in the Effective Field Theory Approach. , 2015, Physical review letters.
[108] M. Hauschild,et al. Measurement of the e+e-→W+W- cross section and W decay branching fractions at LEP , 2007, 0708.1311.
[109] J. Fuentes-Martín,et al. Integrating out heavy particles with functional methods: a simplified framework , 2016, 1607.02142.
[110] M. Trott,et al. Towards consistent Electroweak Precision Data constraints in the SMEFT , 2015, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[111] V. M. Ghete,et al. Search for excited leptons in ℓℓγ final states in proton-proton collisions at s=13$$ \sqrt{\mathrm{s}}=13 $$ TeV , 2018 .
[112] J. Wudka,et al. Patterns of deviation from the standard model , 1994, hep-ph/9405214.
[113] Liam Moore,et al. Constraining top quark effective theory in the LHC Run II era , 2015, 1512.03360.
[114] Christophe Grojean,et al. Effective Lagrangian for a light Higgs-like scalar , 2013, 1303.3876.
[115] S. Dawson,et al. Higgs decays to ZZ and Zγ in the standard model effective field theory: An NLO analysis [Higgs decays to ZZ and Zγ in the SMEFT: An NLO analysis] , 2018 .
[116] A. Falkowski,et al. Electroweak constraints on flavorful effective theories , 2015, 1503.07872.
[117] Jason Aebischer,et al. B physics beyond the Standard Model at one loop: complete renormalization group evolution below the electroweak scale , 2017, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[118] T. Plehn,et al. Interpreting top-quark LHC measurements in the standard-model effective field theory : arXiv , 2018, 1802.07237.
[119] I. Brivio,et al. Scheming in the SMEFT. . . and a reparameterization invariance! , 2017, 1701.06424.
[120] Steven Weinberg,et al. Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes , 1979 .
[121] M. Trott,et al. Consistent constraints on the Standard Model Effective Field Theory , 2015, 1508.05060.
[122] Hitoshi Murayama,et al. 2, 84, 30, 993, 560, 15456, 11962, 261485, . . .: higher dimension operators in the SM EFT , 2015, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[123] V. M. Ghete,et al. Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying to a W boson pair in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV , 2018 .
[124] Michael Trott,et al. Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators. I: formalism and λ dependence , 2013, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[125] S. Dawson,et al. NLO QCD effective field theory analysis of W+ W- production at the LHC including fermionic operators , 2017, 1708.03332.
[126] Scoap. DsixTools: the standard model effective field theory toolkit , 2017 .
[127] R. Contino,et al. Effective field theory analysis of double Higgs boson production via gluon fusion , 2015 .
[128] J. Ellis,et al. Comparing EFT and exact one-loop analyses of non-degenerate stops , 2015, 1504.02409.
[129] J. Ferrando,et al. Results from TopFitter , 2016, Proceedings of 9th International Workshop on the CKM Unitarity Triangle — PoS(CKM2016).
[130] Tevong You,et al. Mixed heavy–light matching in the Universal One-Loop Effective Action , 2016, 1604.02445.
[131] T. Corbett,et al. Exploring extended scalar sectors with di-Higgs signals: a Higgs EFT perspective , 2017, 1705.02551.
[132] Alexandre Alves,et al. Can we discover double Higgs production at the LHC , 2017, 1704.07395.
[133] R. Brenner,et al. Measurement of the W⁺W⁻ production cross section in pp collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS experiment , 2017 .
[134] V. M. Ghete,et al. Observation of the Higgs boson decay to a pair of τ leptons with the CMS detector , 2018 .
[135] Zhengkang Zhang. Time to Go Beyond Triple-Gauge-Boson-Coupling Interpretation of W Pair Production. , 2016, Physical review letters.
[136] Yun Jiang,et al. WCxf: An exchange format for Wilson coefficients beyond the Standard Model , 2017, Comput. Phys. Commun..