A vehicle type-dependent visual imaging model for analysing the heterogeneous car-following dynamics

Heterogeneity is an essential characteristic in car-following behaviours, which can be defined as the differences between the car-following behaviours of driver/vehicle combination under comparable conditions. This paper proposes a visual imaging model (VIM) with relaxed assumption on (1) a driver's perfect perception for the states of the neighbouring vehicles (e.g. spacing, velocity, etc.) and (2) uniform reaction to vehicles with different sizes in most existing car-following models. VIM utilises the visual imaging information subtended by the preceding vehicle as the stimuli drivers react to, and can generate greater stimuli from the preceding vehicle with larger apparent size (i.e. vehicle width × vehicle height) under short gap distance with the follower, but less change in stimuli from the distant leading vehicle under various apparent sizes. The NGSIM data containing vehicle type/size information is used to evaluate VIM at different levels. At the level of single trajectory pair, the calibrated VIM occupies the well capability of reproducing the trajectory of the follower, and can also reproduce statistical results from the field data, that is, the gap distance for car-following truck (C-T) is greater than that for car-following car (C-C). At the level of vehicle type, the calibration results also show the promising performance of VIM in describing heterogeneous car-following behaviours with the simple model formulation and limited model parameters compared with other six reference models.

[1]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[2]  Mario Baum Basic Statistical Analysis , 2016 .

[3]  Zhengbing He,et al.  A new car following model from the perspective of visual imaging , 2015 .

[4]  Tom V. Mathew,et al.  Vehicle-type dependent car-following model for heterogeneous traffic conditions , 2011 .

[5]  W. Seelen,et al.  Intensity and edge-based symmetry detection with an application to car-following , 1993 .

[6]  James R. Sayer,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF LEAD-VEHICLE SIZE ON DRIVER FOLLOWING BEHAVIOR: IS IGNORANCE TRULY BLISS? , 2005 .

[7]  E. Montroll,et al.  Traffic Dynamics: Studies in Car Following , 1958 .

[8]  Stefan Krauss,et al.  MICROSCOPIC MODELING OF TRAFFIC FLOW: INVESTIGATION OF COLLISION FREE VEHICLE DYNAMICS. , 1998 .

[9]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  GENERALIZED FORCE MODEL OF TRAFFIC DYNAMICS , 1998 .

[10]  Nakayama,et al.  Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[11]  Herbert Yoo,et al.  DRIVER BEHAVIOR WHILE FOLLOWING CARS, TRUCKS, AND BUSES , 1999 .

[12]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[13]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Driver Heterogeneity in Car following and Its Impact on Modeling Traffic Dynamics , 2007 .

[14]  Ben Sidaway,et al.  Time-to-Collision Estimation in a Simulated Driving Task , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[15]  Vincenzo Punzo,et al.  Steady-State Solutions and Multiclass Calibration of Gipps Microscopic Traffic Flow Model , 2007 .

[16]  Vincenzo Punzo,et al.  On the assessment of vehicle trajectory data accuracy and application to the Next Generation SIMulation (NGSIM) program data , 2011 .

[17]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Car-following: a historical review , 1999 .

[18]  M T Parker,et al.  THE EFFECT OF HEAVY GOODS VEHICLES AND FOLLOWING BEHAVIOUR ON CAPACITY AT MOTORWAY ROADWORK SITES. , 1996 .

[19]  Leonard Evans,et al.  Perceptual Thresholds in Car-Following---A Comparison of Recent Measurements with Earlier Results , 1977 .

[20]  Guangquan Lu,et al.  Quantitative indicator of homeostatic risk perception in car following , 2012 .

[21]  Werner von Seelen,et al.  Intensity and Edge-Based Symmetry Detection Applied to Car-Following , 1992, ECCV.

[22]  Sheng Jin,et al.  Visual angle model for car-following theory , 2011 .

[23]  R. Mortimer,et al.  Drivers' estimates of time to collision. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Paolo Ferrari The effect of driver behaviour on motorway reliability , 1989 .

[25]  P. G. Gipps,et al.  A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation , 1981 .

[26]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Determinants of following headway in congested traffic , 2009 .

[27]  Helbing,et al.  Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[28]  George J. Andersen,et al.  Optical Information for Car Following: The Driving by Visual Angle (DVA) Model , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[29]  M. Treiber,et al.  Estimating Acceleration and Lane-Changing Dynamics Based on NGSIM Trajectory Data , 2007 .

[30]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Motorway driver behaviour: studies on car following , 2002 .

[31]  Gerald J.S. Wilde,et al.  The Theory of Risk Homeostasis: Implications for Safety and Health , 1982 .

[32]  Hesham Rakha,et al.  Calibration of Steady-State Car-Following Models Using Macroscopic Loop Detector Data , 2010 .

[33]  Ernest Peter Todosiev,et al.  The action point model of the driver-vehicle system / , 1963 .

[34]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Heterogeneity In Car-Following Behavior: Theory And Empirics , 2011 .

[35]  M. Treiber,et al.  Estimating Acceleration and Lane-Changing Dynamics from Next Generation Simulation Trajectory Data , 2008, 0804.0108.

[36]  E A Schoenborn,et al.  THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE (UMTRI) BIBLIOGRAPHY, 1984-1989 , 1990 .