Analog-Digital Power System State Estimation Based on Information Theory—Part II: Implementation and Application

This paper is the second of a two-part series on analog-digital power system state estimation. The minimum-information-loss (MIL) method that calculates an accurate real-time power system model from a set of analog and digital measurements is implemented, applied, and validated. Two MIL implementations are proposed for both power grid and substation state estimation. The performance of the MIL method is evaluated through three tests. First, the success rate of identifying the true topology is statistically quantified for an IEEE 14-bus system and compared with state-of-the-art generalized state estimation (GSE). Then the competitive performance of the MIL method is further substantiated on two real-world test cases that involve the China Eastern power grid in China and a real substation.

[1]  A. Monticelli.  Testing equality constraint hypotheses in weighted least squares state estimators , 1999, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Power Industry Computer Applications. Connecting Utilities. PICA 99. To the Millennium and Beyond (Cat. No.99CH36351).

[2]  M. Kezunovic,et al.  The Dynamic Utilization of Substation Measurements to Maintain Power System Observability , 2006, 2006 IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[3]  Hongbin Sun,et al.  Substation three-phase nonlinear state estimation based on KCL , 2011, 2011 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[4]  M. R. Irving,et al.  Substation data validation , 1982 .

[5]  O. Alsaç,et al.  Generalized state estimation , 1998 .

[6]  Irina Kolosok,et al.  Identification of measurement variances based on test equations using ANN , 2001, 2001 IEEE Porto Power Tech Proceedings (Cat. No.01EX502).

[7]  Hongbin Sun,et al.  Transition to a Two-Level Linear State Estimator—Part I: Architecture , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  A. P. Sakis Meliopoulos,et al.  Advances in the SuperCalibrator Concept - Practical Implementations , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[9]  M. Ribbens-Pavella,et al.  Hypothesis Testing Identification: A New Method For Bad Data Analysis In Power System State Estimation , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[10]  Yu Erkeng,et al.  Novel algorithms to estimate and adaptively update measurement error variance using power system state estimation results , 1998 .

[11]  H. Glavitsch,et al.  Detection and identification of topological errors in online power system analysis , 1991 .

[12]  Ali Abur,et al.  State estimator tuning for PMU measurements , 2011, 2011 North American Power Symposium.

[13]  K. Clements,et al.  Bayesian-based hypothesis testing for topology error identification in generalized state estimation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  N. Singh,et al.  Practical experience with rule-based on-line topology error detection , 1993 .

[15]  Atif S. Debs.  Parameter estimation for power systems in the steady-state , 1974, CDC 1974.

[16]  A. G. Expósito,et al.  Power system state estimation : theory and implementation , 2004 .

[17]  Kai Strunz,et al.  Analog-Digital Power System State Estimation Based on Information Theory—Part I: Theory , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[18]  Anjan Bose,et al.  Transition to a Two-Level Linear State Estimator—Part II: Algorithm , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[19]  Antonio Gómez Expósito,et al.  Reduced Substation Models for Generalized State Estimation , 2001 .