Incorporating stand level risk management options into forest decision support systems

Aim of study:  To examine methods of incorporating risk and uncertainty to stand level forest decisions. Area of study: A case study examines a small forest holding from Jonkoping, Sweden. Material and methods: We incorporate empirically estimated uncertainty into the simulation through a Monte Carlo approach when simulating the forest stands for the next 100 years. For the iterations of the Monte Carlo approach, errors were incorporated into the input data which was simulated according to the Heureka decision support system. Both the Value at Risk and the Conditional Value at Risk of the net present value are evaluated for each simulated stand. Main results: Visual representation of the errors can be used to highlight which decision would be most beneficial dependent on the decision maker’s opinion of the forest inventory results. At a stand level, risk preferences can be rather easily incorporated into the current forest decision support software. Research highlights: Forest management operates under uncertainty and risk. Methods are available to describe this risk in an understandable fashion for the decision maker.

[1]  R. Rockafellar,et al.  Optimization of conditional value-at risk , 2000 .

[2]  Franz Josef Schmithüsen,et al.  Private forest ownership in Europe. , 2010 .

[3]  Philippe Artzner,et al.  Coherent Measures of Risk , 1999 .

[4]  GrafströmAnton,et al.  Data assimilation in stand-level forest inventories , 2013 .

[5]  H. L. Scheurman,et al.  Techniques for Prescribing Optimal Timber Harvest and Investment Under Different Objectives—Discussion and Synthesis , 1977 .

[6]  Kyle Eyvindson,et al.  Potential of using data assimilation to support forest planning , 2017 .

[7]  Sofia Backéus,et al.  Implications of growth uncertainties associated with climate change for stand management , 2011, European Journal of Forest Research.

[8]  Ralf Moshammer,et al.  Financially optimized management planning under risk aversion results in even-flow sustained timber yield , 2014 .

[9]  Tomas Lämås,et al.  The influence of forest data quality on planning processes in forestry , 2006 .

[10]  D. Duffie,et al.  An Overview of Value at Risk , 1997 .

[11]  Markku Siitonen.  Experiences in the use of forest management planning models. , 1993 .

[12]  Miguel Constantino,et al.  A stochastic approach to optimize Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) stand management scheduling under fire risk. An application in Portugal , 2014, Ann. Oper. Res..

[13]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Correlations, distributions, and trends in forest inventory errors and their effects on forest planning , 2010 .

[14]  Ljusk Ola Eriksson,et al.  The Heureka Forestry Decision Support System: An Overview , 2011, Math. Comput. For. Nat. Resour. Sci..

[15]  Annika Susanna Kangas,et al.  Value of forest information , 2010, European Journal of Forest Research.

[16]  Eldon Gunn,et al.  Some Perspectives on Strategic Forest Management Models and the Forest Products Supply Chain , 2009, INFOR Inf. Syst. Oper. Res..

[17]  David N. Nawrocki.  A Brief History of Downside Risk Measures , 1999 .

[18]  L. Bondesson,et al.  A method to determine optimal stand data acquisition policies , 1994 .

[19]  María Triviño,et al.  Managing boreal forests for the simultaneous production of collectable goods and timber revenues , 2016 .

[20]  Alan Cooper,et al.  About Face 3: the essentials of interaction design , 1995 .

[21]  Ljusk Ola Eriksson,et al.  Review. Assessing uncertainty and risk in forest planning and decision support systems: review of classical methods and introduction of new approaches , 2013 .

[22]  F. Knight.  The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .

[23]  老子,et al.  The simple way , 1913 .

[24]  K. Miettinen,et al.  Spatially dynamic forest management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[25]  Teppo Hujala,et al.  Computer-based tools for supporting forest management , 2014 .

[26]  A. Haara,et al.  The Assessment of the Uncertainty of Updated Stand-Level Inventory Data , 2009 .

[27]  Ljusk Ola Eriksson,et al.  Influence of temporal aggregation on strategic forest management under risk of wind damage , 2014, Ann. Oper. Res..

[28]  Ian N. Durbach,et al.  Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Kyle Eyvindson,et al.  Implementing the conditional value at risk approach for even-flow forest management planning , 2016 .

[30]  Alan J. King,et al.  Modeling with Stochastic Programming , 2012 .

[31]  T. Stewart,et al.  A comparison of simplified value function approaches for treating uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis , 2012 .

[32]  Andrew P. Robinson,et al.  A simple way to incorporate uncertainty and risk into forest harvest scheduling , 2016 .

[33]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Simultaneous optimization of harvest schedule and measurement strategy , 2014 .