Homogeneity effects in natural language semantics

Abstract Natural language sentences in which a property is ascribed to a plurality of objects have truth conditions that are not complementary with the truth conditions of the negations of such sentences. Starting from this observation, this paper presents an overview of so‐called homogeneity effects. Arguably a pervasive feature of natural language, homogeneity has reflexes in various domains and opens up a prospect for a unified analysis of phenomena that were hitherto viewed in quite different terms.

[1]  Jérémy Zehr.  Vagueness, presupposition and truth-value judgements , 2014 .

[2]  Sarah Moss,et al.  On the Pragmatics of Counterfactuals , 2012 .

[3]  Benjamin Spector,et al.  Interpreting plural predication: homogeneity and non-maximality , 2020, Linguistics and Philosophy.

[4]  Godehard Link.  The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice‐theoretical Approach , 2008 .

[5]  E. Chemla,et al.  Two methods to find truth-value gaps and their application to the projection problem of homogeneity , 2015 .

[6]  Florian Schwarz,et al.  Maximality and Definite Plurals - Experimental Evidence , 2013 .

[7]  Giorgio Magri,et al.  No need for a dedicated theory of the distribution of readings of English bare plurals , 2012 .

[8]  Peter Klecha.  Two Kinds of Sobel Sequences:Precision in Conditionals , 2014 .

[9]  J. Higginbotham.  Conditionals and Compositionality , 2003 .

[10]  Friederike Moltmann.  Parts and Wholes in Semantics , 1997 .

[11]  S. Philippe,et al.  Conditionals as Definite Descriptions (A Referential Analysis) , 2002 .

[12]  William Harper,et al.  Ifs. Conditionals, Belief, Decision, Chance, and Time , 1981 .

[13]  Kai von Fintel,et al.  NPI Licensing, Strawson Entailment, and Context Dependency , 1999, J. Semant..

[14]  Daniel Büring,et al.  It's that, and that's it! Exhaustivity and homogeneity presuppositions in clefts (and definites) , 2013 .

[15]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  The linguistic description of opaque contexts , 1979 .

[16]  Philippe Schlenker,et al.  Conditionals as Definite Descriptions , 2004 .

[17]  Lucas Champollion.  Parts of a Whole: Distributivity as a Bridge between Aspect and Measurement , 2017 .

[18]  Emmanuel Chemla,et al.  Probability Judgments of Gappy Sentences , 2017 .

[19]  Giorgio Magri.  An Account for the Homogeneity Effect Triggered by Plural Definites and Conjunction Based on Double Strengthening , 2014 .

[20]  Nathan Klinedinst,et al.  Quantified Conditionals and Conditional Excluded Middle , 2011, J. Semant..

[21]  Sebastian Löbner,et al.  Polarity in Natural Language: Predication, Quantification and Negation in Particular and Characterizing Sentences , 2000 .

[22]  Robert Stalnaker.  A Defense of Conditional Excluded Middle , 1980 .

[23]  Manuel Kriz,et al.  Homogeneity, Non-Maximality, and all , 2016, J. Semant..

[24]  A. Cohen,et al.  Generics and Mental Representations , 2004 .

[25]  Malte Willer,et al.  Lessons from Sobel sequences , 2017 .

[26]  Sophia A. Malamud.  The meaning of plural definites: A decision-theoretic approach , 2012 .

[27]  K. Hale,et al.  Ken Hale: A Life in Language , 2001 .

[28]  Manuel Kriz,et al.  Aspects of homogeneity in the semantics of natural language , 2015 .