Understanding the impact of the alphabetical ordering of names in user interfaces: a gender bias analysis

Listing people alphabetically on an electronic output device is a traditional technique, since alphabetical order is easily perceived by users and facilitates access to information. However, this apparently harmless technique, especially when the list is ordered by first name, needs to be used with caution by designers and programmers. We show, via empirical data analysis, that when an interface displays people's first name in alphabetical order in several pages/screens, each page/screen may have imbalances in respect to gender of its Top-k individuals.k represents the size of the list of names visualized first, which may be the number of names that fits in a screen page of a certain device.The research work was carried out with the analysis of actual datasets of names of five different countries. Each dataset has a person name and the frequency of adoption of the name in the country.Our analysis shows that, even though all countries have exhibit imbalance problems, the samples of individuals with Brazilian and Spanish first names are more prone to gender imbalance among their Top-k individuals. These results can be useful for designers and engineers to construct information systems that avoid gender bias induction.

[1]  G. S. Watson,et al.  Smooth regression analysis , 1964 .

[2]  E. Nadaraya On Estimating Regression , 1964 .

[3]  Paul Ginsparg,et al.  Positional effects on citation and readership in arXiv , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  M. Culnan Protecting Privacy Online: Is Self-Regulation Working? , 2000 .

[5]  Sean Larrangton-White Midm Designing Web Usability: The practice of simplicity , 2001 .

[6]  Ricardo Baeza-Yates,et al.  FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithm , 2017, CIKM.

[7]  Leeat Yariv,et al.  What's in a Surname? The Effects of Surname Initials on Academic Success , 2006 .

[8]  Abolfazl Asudeh,et al.  Designing Fair Ranking Schemes , 2017, SIGMOD Conference.

[9]  Patrick Gaulé,et al.  It’s Good to Be First: Order Bias in Reading and Citing NBER Working Papers , 2015, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[10]  Sarah Diefenbach,et al.  Experience-Oriented and Product-Oriented Evaluation: Psychological Need Fulfillment, Positive Affect, and Product Perception , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  Arthur J. Robson,et al.  Certified Random: A New Order for Co-Authorship , 2016 .

[13]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Bias in computer systems , 1996, TOIS.

[14]  Matthias Weber,et al.  The Effects of Listing Authors in Alphabetical Order: A Review of the Empirical Evidence , 2018 .

[15]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques , 2002, TOIS.

[17]  Heiko Jacobs,et al.  Alphabetic Bias, Investor Recognition, and Trading Behavior , 2015 .

[18]  Nisheeth K. Vishnoi,et al.  Ranking with Fairness Constraints , 2017, ICALP.

[19]  Julia Stoyanovich,et al.  Measuring Fairness in Ranked Outputs , 2016, SSDBM.

[20]  Steven Pemberton Hotel heartbreak , 2003, INTR.

[21]  T M Tierney,et al.  Social Security Administration , 2020, Federal Regulatory Guide.

[22]  P. Pirolli Information Foraging Theory: Adaptive Interaction with Information , 2007 .

[23]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  The Thing and I: Understanding the Relationship Between User and Product , 2005, Funology.

[24]  Musheer Ahmad,et al.  Fisher-Yates Chaotic Shuffling Based Image Encryption , 2014, ArXiv.

[25]  Jeffrey S. Racine,et al.  Nonparametric estimation of regression functions with both categorical and continuous data , 2004 .

[26]  H. V. Jagadish,et al.  Online Set Selection with Fairness and Diversity Constraints , 2018, EDBT.

[27]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity , 1999 .

[28]  Mahzarin R. Banaji,et al.  First Is Best , 2012, PloS one.

[29]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  LEXICOGRAPHIC ORDERS, UTILITIES AND DECISION RULES: A SURVEY , 1974 .

[30]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[31]  I Mohd Taib,et al.  LOOPHOLE ALLOWS BIAS IN DISPLAYS ON COMPUTER RESERVATIONS SYSTEMS , 1990 .

[32]  Paul Ginsparg,et al.  Positional effects on citation and readership in arXiv , 2009 .