Refining a Teaching Pattern: Reflection Around Artefacts

Reflection is a critical component in creative design, but may be difficult for novices to employ or explicitly express. Pedagogy to promote such expression may be enhanced by requiring undergraduate students to explain how they conceptualised, fabricated, revised and consulted though a semi-formal performance to peers. By incorporating spoken as well as deictic gestural expression into their performance, students are readily able to reveal their thinking. This study reports on a longitudinal teaching experiment designed to establish and better understand pedagogy concerned with inducing student reflection around self-made artefacts. A comparison of a single pedagogical pattern over time indicates that a durable and successful teaching methodology was captured and refined. An analysis of in-performance spoken and gestural expression revealed a high density of complex high-level reflection by students. This study has implications for pedagogical design of undergraduate programs requiring reflection and the evaluation of student reflection based on performance.

[1]  Michael Ryan,et al.  Reflections around artefacts : using a deliberative approach to teaching reflective practices in fashion studies , 2011 .

[2]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[3]  Sue Bailey,et al.  Fashion Variations: Students Approaches to Learning in Fashion Design , 2002 .

[4]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Innovation and Culture: Exploring the Work of Designers Across the Globe , 2011 .

[5]  Michael Ryan Measured talk: structured peer analysis of project-based mediated dialogue , 2008 .

[6]  Kathryn McKelvey,et al.  Fashion Design: Process, Innovation and Practice , 2003 .

[7]  Bridget Somekh,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Educational Action Research , 2009 .

[8]  Leslie P. Steffe,et al.  Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements , 2000 .

[9]  Isobel Falconer,et al.  Mediating between practitioner and developer communities: the Learning Activity Design in Education experience , 2007 .

[10]  Maryanne M. Gobble,et al.  Design Thinking , 2010, The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible.

[11]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[12]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[13]  Sigrid Norris,et al.  Three hierarchical positions of deictic gesture in relation to spoken language: a multimodal interaction analysis , 2011 .

[14]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[15]  Julian Malins,et al.  Visualizing Research: A Guide to the Research Process in Art and Design , 2004 .

[16]  Reinders Duit,et al.  The teaching experiment as a powerful method to develop and evaluate teaching and learning sequences in the domain of non‐linear systems , 2004 .

[17]  Max Jacobson,et al.  A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction , 1981 .

[18]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  Designing for Learning in an Open World , 2012 .

[19]  Mary E. Ryan,et al.  Theorising a model for teaching and assessing reflective learning in higher education , 2013 .

[20]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[21]  A. Bakker,et al.  Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects , 2011 .

[22]  D. McNeill Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought , 1992 .