Adiabatic energization in the ring current and its relation to other source and loss terms

[1] The influence of adiabatic energization and deenergization effects, caused by particle drift in radial distance, on ring current growth rates and loss lifetimes is investigated. Growth and loss rates from simulation results of four storms (5 June 1991, 15 May 1997, 19 October 1998, and 25 September 1998) are examined and compared against the y component of the solar wind electric field (Ey,sw). Energy change rates with and without the inclusion of adiabatic energy changes are considered to isolate the influence of this mechanism in governing changes of ring current strength. It is found that the influence of adiabatic drift effects on the energy change rates is very large when energization and deenergization are considered separately as gain and loss mechanisms, often about an order of magnitude larger than all other source or loss terms combined. This is true not only during storm times, when the open drift path configuration of the hot ions dominates the physics of the ring current, but also during quiet times, when the small oscillation in L of the closed trajectories creates a large source and loss of energy each drift orbit. However, the net energy change from adiabatic drift is often smaller than other source and loss processes, especially during quiet times. Energization from adiabatic drift dominates ring current growth only during portions of the main phase of storms. Furthermore, the net-adiabatic energization is often positive, because some particles are lost in the inner magnetosphere before they can adiabatically deenergize. It is shown that the inclusion of only this net-adiabatic drift effect in the total source rate or loss lifetime (depending on the sign of the net-adiabatic energization) best matches the observed source and loss values from empirical Dst predictor methods (that is, for consistency, these values should be compared between the calculation methods). While adiabatic deenergization dominates the loss timescales for all Ey,sw values, there is a characteristic decrease in the loss lifetime for higher Ey,sw, seen computationally and observationally. It is shown that these shorter loss lifetimes at higher Ey,sw are caused primarily by enhanced dayside flow out. The simulation results show that, on average, flow out is a larger energy loss term than charge exchange (the next biggest loss term for the ring current) for all Ey,sw values.

[1]  M. F. Thomsen,et al.  Particle tomography of the inner magnetosphere , 2002 .

[2]  J. Borovsky,et al.  Multistep Dst development and ring current composition changes during the 4–6 June 1991 magnetic storm , 2002 .

[3]  J. Borovsky,et al.  Dominant role of the asymmetric ring current in producing the stormtime , 2001 .

[4]  E. Roelof,et al.  Imaging two geomagnetic storms in energetic neutral atoms , 2001 .

[5]  M. Lampton,et al.  First medium energy neutral atom (MENA) Images of Earth's magnetosphere during substorm and storm‐time , 2001 .

[6]  A. Jorgensen,et al.  Charge exchange contribution to the decay of the ring current, measured by energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) , 2001 .

[7]  J. Green,et al.  Views of Earth's magnetosphere with the image satellite. , 2001, Science.

[8]  Y. Ebihara,et al.  Simulation study on fundamental properties of the storm‐time ring current , 2000 .

[9]  R. McPherron,et al.  An empirical phase space analysis of ring current dynamics: Solar wind control of injection and decay , 2000 .

[10]  D. Hamilton,et al.  A test of the Dessler‐Parker‐Sckopke relation during magnetic storms , 2000 .

[11]  V. Jordanova,et al.  Ring current activity during the early Bz < 0 phase of the January 1997 magnetic cloud , 1999 .

[12]  M. Liemohn,et al.  Analysis of early phase ring current recovery mechanisms during geomagnetic storms , 1999 .

[13]  J. Borovsky,et al.  Effects of a high‐density plasma sheet on ring current development during the November 2–6, 1993, magnetic storm , 1998 .

[14]  H. Narita,et al.  Acid ions at triple junction of Antarctic ice observed by Raman scattering , 1998 .

[15]  J. Steinberg,et al.  October 1995 magnetic cloud and accompanying storm activity: Ring current evolution , 1998 .

[16]  J. Birn,et al.  Characteristic plasma properties during dispersionless substorm injections at geosynchronous orbit , 1997 .

[17]  Janet U. Kozyra,et al.  Collisional losses of ring current ions , 1996 .

[18]  D. Weimer,et al.  Models of high‐latitude electric potentials derived with a least error fit of spherical harmonic coefficients , 1995 .

[19]  H. W. Kroehl,et al.  What is a geomagnetic storm , 1994 .

[20]  Margaret W. Chen,et al.  Simulations of phase space distributions of storm time proton ring current , 1994 .

[21]  C. E. Rasmussen,et al.  Decay of equatorial ring current ions and associated aeronomical consequences , 1993 .

[22]  M. F. Thomsen,et al.  Magnetospheric plasma analyzer for spacecraft with constrained resources , 1993 .

[23]  Margaret W. Chen,et al.  Stormtime transport of ring current and radiation belt ions , 1993 .

[24]  G. Gisler,et al.  High‐Z energetic particles at geosynchronous orbit during the Great Solar Proton Event Series of October 1989 , 1992 .

[25]  Arthur D. Richmond,et al.  Mapping electrodynamic features of the high-latitude ionosphere from localized observations: technique , 1988 .

[26]  C. Mcilwain A Kp dependent equatorial electric field model , 1986 .

[27]  Lou‐Chuang Lee,et al.  On the ring current energy injection rate , 1983 .

[28]  Lou‐Chuang Lee,et al.  Ring current energy injection rate and solar wind-magnetosphere energy coupling , 1982 .

[29]  R. W. Spiro,et al.  Dependence of polar cap potential drop on interplanetary parameters , 1981 .

[30]  Syun-Ichi Akasofu,et al.  Energy coupling between the solar wind and the magnetosphere , 1981 .

[31]  D. Williams,et al.  A source for the geomagnetic storm main phase ring current , 1980 .

[32]  C. Russell,et al.  An empirical relationship between interplanetary conditions and Dst , 1975 .

[33]  G. Siscoe,et al.  Energy and momentum theorems in magnetospheric processes , 1973 .

[34]  C. Mcilwain,et al.  PLASMA CLOUDS IN THE MAGNETOSPHERE. , 1971 .

[35]  Norbert Sckopke,et al.  A general relation between the energy of trapped particles and the disturbance field near the Earth , 1966 .

[36]  E. Parker,et al.  Hydromagnetic theory of geomagnetic storms , 1959 .