A Delphi Investigation to Explain the Voluntary Adoption of XBRL 1

The objective of this paper is to identify the fact ors that could have led North-American companies to voluntarily submit their information i n XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) under the XBRL Voluntary Financial Reporting Program (2005-2008). The motivation that led us to carry out this analysis was the fact that, despite the many benefits attributed to XBRL , only 137 companies (out of over 10.000 filers) deci ded to join the voluntary program issued by the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission). At this point, we wondered if the SEC should have promoted other benefits to encourage companies to use XBRL. To reach our goal, we conducted a Delphi study. Through this study, we asked a panel of XBRL experts their opinion about the reasons that could have led companies to voluntaril y disclose their business information in XBRL. Our results show that, according to experts, factor s such as to gain a deeper knowledege of XBRL and to acquire a company image as a pioneer in tech nology played an essential role in the process of voluntary adoption of the standard.

[1]  Amelia Annette Baldwin-Morgan.  The impact of expert system audit tools on auditing firms in the year 2001: A Delphi investigation , 1993 .

[2]  Reza Khorramshahgol,et al.  Delphic hierarchy process (DHP): A methodology for priority setting derived from the Delphi method and analytical hierarchy process , 1988 .

[3]  Simon Hakim,et al.  Using the Delphi process to analyze social policy implementation: A post hoc case from vocational rehabilitation , 1993 .

[4]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  Key Issues in Information Systems Management: 1994-95 SIM Delphi Results , 1996, MIS Q..

[5]  N. Dalkey,et al.  An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts , 1963 .

[6]  Stephen L. Tucker,et al.  A quality human resource curriculum: Recommendations from leading senior HR executives , 1997 .

[7]  Joanne Locke,et al.  XBRL: An (Open) Source of Enlightenment or Disillusion? , 2007 .

[8]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Reengineering Business Reporting Creating a Test Bed for Technology Driven Reporting , 2008 .

[9]  David H. Gustafson,et al.  Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes , 1976 .

[10]  Mike Willis.  Improving investor communications and analysis via standardization , 2007 .

[11]  Robert E. Pinsker,et al.  An empirical examination of competing theories to explain continuous disclosure technology adoption intentions using XBRL as the example technology , 2008 .

[12]  Tom Addison,et al.  E-commerce project development risks: evidence from a Delphi survey , 2003, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[13]  Ilkka A. Ronkainen,et al.  International Business and Trade in the Next Decade: Report from a Delphi Study , 1997 .

[14]  Vicente Pina,et al.  E-government and the transformation of public administrations in EU countries: Beyond NPM or just a second wave of reforms? , 2005, Online Inf. Rev..

[15]  F. David,et al.  From an object-oriented approach to the financial reporting: an open architecture , 2007 .

[16]  Thomas E. McKee,et al.  A Comparison of the Information Technology Knowledge of United States and German Auditors , 2008 .

[17]  James H. Bookbinder,et al.  THE FUTURE OF LOGISTICS IN CANADA: A DELPHI-BASED FORECAST. , 1994 .