Evaluation of the effects of everolimus‐eluting and paclitaxel‐eluting stents on target lesions with jailed side branches: 2‐year results from the SPIRIT III randomized trial

Objective: To evaluate whether an everolimus‐eluting stent (EES) with thinner stent struts and polymer results in less periprocedural myonecrosis and adverse outcomes. Background: Higher periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) rates have been reported with the TAXUS® EXPRESS2 paclitaxel‐eluting stent (PES) compared to the bare metal EXPRESS2® stent due to more frequent side branch compromise, presumably attributable to the thickness of the stent/polymer on the PES. Methods: In the SPIRIT III trial, we identified 113 patients in the XIENCE V® EES group and 63 patients in the TAXUS EXPRESS2 PES group who met the criteria of having a lesion with a jailed side branch (<2 mm diameter, and <50% stenosis). Two‐year clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results: A periprocedural increase in Creatine Kinase‐MB >1× upper normal level occurred in 9.0% of EES compared to 29.7% of PES patients with jailed side branches, P = 0.01. Through 2 years, major adverse cardiac events (MACE; cardiac death, MI, or target lesion revascularization [TLR]) occurred in 6.8% of EES and 19.0% of PES jailed side branch patients (P = 0.03), with numerically lower rates of MI (2.9% vs. 10.3%, P = 0.07) and TLR (3.9% vs. 10.3%, P = 0.17) in the EES group, with comparable rates of cardiac death (1.9% vs. 1.7%, P = 1.00). Conclusions: In this post‐hoc analysis of the SPIRIT III RCT, patients undergoing stenting of target lesions with jailed side branches with the thin strut and polymer XIENCE V EES compared to the thicker strut TAXUS PES had lower rates of MACE through 2 years due to fewer MIs and TLRs. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  A. Kirtane,et al.  Frequency and Clinical Consequences Associated With Sidebranch Occlusion During Stent Implantation Using Zotarolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[2]  G. Stone,et al.  Randomized Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: Two-Year Clinical Follow-Up From the Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SPIRIT) III Trial , 2009, Circulation.

[3]  Seung‐Jung Park,et al.  Impact of periprocedural myonecrosis on clinical events after implantation of drug-eluting stents. , 2008, International journal of cardiology.

[4]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Comparison of an everolimus-eluting stent and a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. , 2008, JAMA.

[5]  G. Biondi-Zoccai,et al.  Next-generation drug-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: focus on everolimus-eluting stent (Xience V®) , 2008, Vascular health and risk management.

[6]  P. Serruys,et al.  Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials: A Case for Standardized Definitions , 2007, Circulation.

[7]  D. Holmes,et al.  Isolated elevation in troponin T after percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with higher long-term mortality. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  J. Popma,et al.  Clinical Efficacy of Polymer-Based Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of Complex, Long Coronary Artery Lesions From a Multicenter, Randomized Trial: Support for the Use of Drug-Eluting Stents in Contemporary Clinical Practice , 2005, Circulation.

[9]  Young‐Bae Park,et al.  Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  S. Savonitto,et al.  Prognostic significance of creatine kinase release after percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2005, Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[11]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Fate of side branches after coronary arterial sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  A. Colombo,et al.  Sidebranch patency during main branch stenting: try to keep the branch open immediate and long-term! , 2002, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[13]  E. Topol,et al.  Frequency and long-term impact of myonecrosis after coronary stenting. , 2002, European heart journal.

[14]  R. Kim,et al.  Myonecrosis following stent placement: association between impaired TIMI myocardial perfusion grade and MRI visualization of microinfarction. , 2002, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[15]  P. Seidelin,et al.  Sidebranch compromise during percutaneous coronary interventions. , 2002, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[16]  G. Stone,et al.  Atherosclerotic plaque burden and CK-MB enzyme elevation after coronary interventions : intravascular ultrasound study of 2256 patients. , 2000, Circulation.

[17]  R. Califf,et al.  Myonecrosis after revascularization procedures. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  E. Topol,et al.  Significance of mild transient release of creatine kinase-MB fraction after percutaneous coronary interventions. , 1996, Circulation.

[19]  E. Topol,et al.  Long-term outcome of transient, uncomplicated in-laboratory coronary artery closure. , 1995, Circulation.

[20]  P. Teirstein,et al.  Fate of lesion-related side branches after coronary artery stenting. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  Samin K. Sharma,et al.  Correlation of postpercutaneous coronary intervention creatine kinase-MB and troponin I elevation in predicting mid-term mortality. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  U. Deligonul Coronary Morphologic andClinical Determinants ofProcedural OutcomeWith Angioplasty forMultivessel Coronary Disease Implications forPatient Selection , 1990 .