Froth recovery measurements in an industrial flotation cell

Abstract The froth phase serves an important role in upgrading the final concentrate in flotation. At present, the techniques that are used in the mineral industry to determine the effect of froth phase on the metallurgical performance of plant scale flotation cells have limitations. The aim of this paper is to investigate the performance of the froth in an industrial flotation cell. A unique device has been developed which is able to decouple the froth zone from the pulp zone. The device consists of two concentric tubes. The inner tube acts as a dropback collection chamber or catcher. The particles that return from the froth phase fall directly into the catcher and are collected as froth dropback. This technique is capable of measuring plant scale flotation cell froth recovery as well as providing valuable information on froth dropback particles. The froth recovery measurements were carried out in a rougher bank of a copper concentrator treating sulphide minerals. The dropback device is designed so that it can be immersed into an industrial size flotation cell and plant froth recovery measurements can be taken at any given location. During the experiments, the bubbles laden with valuable mineral particles entered the device from the flotation cell, subsequently rising to form a froth layer at the top of the device. The particles that detached or drained from the froth zone were collected in the dropback collection chamber whereas the concentrate sample was collected through a launder. By sizing and chemical analysis of the concentrate and dropback samples, the froth recovery was estimated on the basis of the valuable component. The effect of air rate on the froth recovery was also investigated. Metallurgical grades of the froth dropback device samples for different particle size ranges were compared to those of the concentrator to better understand the froth dropback mechanism.

[1]  G. Jameson,et al.  The effect of hydrophobicity on the drainage of gangue minerals in flotation froths , 2004 .

[2]  Ying Gu Automated Scanning Electron Microscope Based Mineral Liberation Analysis An Introduction to JKMRC/FEI Mineral Liberation Analyser , 2003 .

[3]  Rick Honaker,et al.  Evaluation of the selective detachment process in flotation froth , 2003 .

[4]  Graeme J. Jameson,et al.  The effect of flotation variables on the recovery of different particle size fractions in the froth and the pulp , 2012 .

[5]  C. Dell Mineral and coal flotation circuits: Developments in mineral processing, vol. 3, by A.J. Lynch, N.W. Johnson, E.V. Manlapig and C.G. Thorne. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1981, xiv + 292 pp., Dfl. 130/US$55.25, ISBN 0-444-41919-5 , 1982 .

[6]  Juan Yianatos,et al.  Froth recovery of industrial flotation cells , 2008 .

[7]  S. P. Barber,et al.  Effects of froth structure and mobility on the performance and simulation of continuously operated flotation cells , 1986 .

[8]  P. G. Smith,et al.  Entrainment of Particles into Flotation Froths , 1989 .

[9]  Stephen J. Neethling Simple approximations for estimating froth recovery , 2008 .

[10]  Emmanuel Manlapig,et al.  Froth recovery measurement in plant scale flotation cells , 2003 .

[11]  V. Ross,et al.  An investigation of sub-processes in equilibrium froths (I): the mechanisms of detachment and drainage , 1991 .

[12]  J. Finch,et al.  Holdup Profile and Bubble Size Distribution of Flotation Column Froths , 1986 .

[13]  M. A. Vera A touch of froth : how bubble-particle aggregates take the strain; an investigation into aspects of froth zone recovery in mineral flotation , 2002 .

[14]  M. Moys A study of a plug-flow model for flotation froth behaviour , 1978 .

[15]  Emmanuel Manlapig,et al.  Selective transport of attached particles across the pulp-froth interface , 2006 .

[16]  O. Savassi Direct estimation of the degree of entrainment and the froth recovery of attached particles in industrial flotation cells , 1998 .

[17]  J-P. Franzidis,et al.  Bubble load measurement in the pulp zone of industrial flotation machines—a new device for determining the froth recovery of attached particles , 2004 .

[18]  J. Franzidis,et al.  Simultaneous determination of collection zone rate constant and froth zone recovery in a mechanical flotation environment , 1999 .

[19]  G. Jameson,et al.  Collection of hydrophobic particles in the froth phase , 2002 .

[20]  J. Frew,et al.  Modelling the effect of froth depth in flotation , 1987 .

[21]  H. Smith,et al.  The Effect of Froth on Flotation Kinetics-A Mass Transfer Approach , 1989 .

[22]  Sameer H. Morar,et al.  The use of the froth surface lamellae burst rate as a flotation froth stability measurement , 2012 .

[23]  Seher Ata,et al.  Phenomena in the froth phase of flotation — A review , 2012 .

[24]  Z. T. Mathe,et al.  Review of froth modelling in steady state flotation systems , 1998 .

[25]  J. Finch,et al.  Selectivity in column flotation froths , 1988 .

[26]  T. Napier-Munn,et al.  Studies on impeller type, impeller speed and air flow rate in an industrial scale flotation cell. Part 5: Validation of k-Sb relationship and effect of froth depth , 1998 .

[27]  V. E. Ross An investigation of sub-processes in equilibrium froths (II): the effect of operating conditions , 1991 .

[28]  M. Falutsu,et al.  Direct measurement of froth drop back and collection zone recovery in a laboratory flotation column , 1989 .

[29]  Graeme J. Jameson,et al.  Development of a froth dropback measurement device , 2010 .