Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Scan in the Follow-Up of Lymphoma

PURPOSE In lymphoma, [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is routinely used for initial staging, early evaluation of treatment response, and identification of disease relapse. However, there are no prospective studies investigating the value of serial FDG-PET over time in patients in complete remission. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients with lymphoma who achieved the first complete remission were prospectively enrolled onto the study and scheduled for serial FDG-PET scans at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months; further scans were then carried out on an annual basis. Overall, the population included 421 patients (160 patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma [HL], 183 patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [NHL], and 78 patients with indolent follicular NHL). All patients had a regular follow-up evaluation, including complete clinical and laboratory evaluation, and final assessment of any suspect FDG-PET findings using other imaging procedures (computed tomography [CT] scan) and/or biopsy and/or clinical evolution. FDG-PET findings were reported as positive for relapse, inconclusive (when equivocal), or negative for relapse. RESULTS PET enabled documentation of lymphoma relapse in 41 cases at 6 months, in 30 cases at 12 months, in 26 cases at 18 months, in 10 cases at 24 months, and in 11 cases at more than 36 months. All 36 patients with inconclusive positive PET underwent biopsy; only 12 (33%) of 36 patients had a concomitant suggestion of positivity on CT. A lymphoma relapse was diagnosed in 24 (66%) of 36 patients. CONCLUSION Our results confirm FDG-PET as a valid tool for follow-up of patients with HL and NHL. In patients with inconclusive positive results, histologic confirmation plays an important role in identifying true relapse.

[1]  Sigrid Stroobants,et al.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Predictive role of positron emission tomography in the outcome of patients with follicular lymphoma. , 2007, Clinical lymphoma & myeloma.

[3]  K. Kelly,et al.  Routine Use of PET Scans After Completion of Therapy in Pediatric Hodgkin Disease Results in a High False Positive Rate , 2006, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[4]  S. Pileri,et al.  Early positron emission tomography (PET) restaging: a predictive final response in Hodgkin's disease patients. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[5]  W. Martin,et al.  Utility of FDG-PET/CT in Follow-Up of Children Treated for Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma , 2006, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[6]  Lotty Hooft,et al.  18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for post-treatment evaluation of malignant lymphoma: a systematic review. , 2006, Haematologica.

[7]  F. d'Amore,et al.  Position emission tomography with or without computed tomography in the primary staging of Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2006, Haematologica.

[8]  A. Levis,et al.  The predictive value of positron emission tomography scanning performed after two courses of standard therapy on treatment outcome in advanced stage Hodgkin's disease. , 2006, Haematologica.

[9]  Martin Hutchings,et al.  FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2006, Blood.

[10]  M. O'Doherty,et al.  FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[11]  N. Mikhaeel,et al.  Prognostic value of interim FDG-PET after two or three cycles of chemotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  P. Solal-Céligny,et al.  Follicular lymphoma international prognostic index , 2006, Blood.

[13]  A. Alavi,et al.  18F-FDG PET in malignant lymphoma: significance of positive findings , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  L. Specht,et al.  FDG-PET in the clinical management of Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2004, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[15]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Predictive role of positron emission tomography (PET) in the outcome of lymphoma patients , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  J. Leonard,et al.  The role of FDG-PET imaging in the management of lymphoma. , 2004, Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O.

[17]  Ronald R Price,et al.  FDG PET in the follow-up management of patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma after first-line chemotherapy. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  R. Hicks,et al.  Frequent impact of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on the staging and management of patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2003, Clinical lymphoma.

[19]  J. Czernin,et al.  PET for staging of Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[20]  L. Mortelmans,et al.  Positron emission tomography with [18F]FDG for therapy response monitoring in lymphoma patients , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[21]  R. Hustinx,et al.  Early detection of relapse by whole-body positron emission tomography in the follow-up of patients with Hodgkin's disease. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[22]  J. Leonard,et al.  PET predicts prognosis after 1 cycle of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  Kazutaka Hayashi,et al.  Clinical impact of whole body FDG-PET on the staging and therapeutic decision making for malignant lymphoma , 2002, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[24]  R. Fisher,et al.  Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, gallium-67 scintigraphy, and conventional staging for Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2002, The American journal of medicine.

[25]  Frank Grünwald,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography for the Staging of Hodgkin's Lymphoma - Increasing the Body of Evidence in Favor of the Method , 2002, Acta oncologica.

[26]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Advantages of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) with Respect to Computed Tomography in the Follow-up of Lymphoma Patients with Abdominal Presentation , 2002, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[27]  P. Dupont,et al.  Can positron emission tomography with [18F]‐fluorodeoxyglucose after first‐line treatment distinguish Hodgkin's disease patients who need additional therapy from others in whom additional therapy would mean avoidable toxicity? , 2001, British journal of haematology.

[28]  Michael E. Phelps,et al.  Effect of Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET Imaging on Clinical Staging and Management of Patients with Malignant Lymphoma , 2001 .

[29]  J Kotzerke,et al.  2‐(fluorine‐18)fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose positron emission tomography in the detection and staging of malignant lymphoma , 2001, Cancer.

[30]  P. Valk,et al.  Effect of whole-body (18)F-FDG PET imaging on clinical staging and management of patients with malignant lymphoma. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[31]  G. Jerusalem,et al.  Whole-body positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose compared to standard procedures for staging patients with Hodgkin's disease. , 2001, Haematologica.

[32]  B. Krug,et al.  Whole-body positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for initial staging of patients with Hodgkin's disease , 2001, Annals of Hematology.

[33]  S. Hain,et al.  18-FDG-PET as a Prognostic Indicator in the Treatment of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma-Comparison with CT , 2000, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[34]  Clara D. Bloomfield,et al.  The World Health Organization classification of neoplasms of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting--Airlie House, Virginia, November, 1997. , 2000, The hematology journal : the official journal of the European Haematology Association.

[35]  J. Armitage,et al.  Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  G. Jerusalem,et al.  Whole-body 18F-FDG PET for the evaluation of patients with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 1999, Nuclear medicine communications.

[37]  J. Poen,et al.  Detection of relapse in early-stage Hodgkin's disease: role of routine follow-up studies. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  J. Radford,et al.  Follow up policy after treatment for Hodgkin's disease: too many clinic visits and routine tests? A review of hospital records , 1997, BMJ.

[39]  Emili Montserrat,et al.  A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  M Tubiana,et al.  Report of a committee convened to discuss the evaluation and staging of patients with Hodgkin's disease: Cotswolds meeting. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.