COMMENTS AND CONTROVERSIES Why Voxel-Based Morphometry Should Be Used

This article has been written in response to Dr. Fred L. Bookstein’s article entitled ‘“Voxel-Based Morphometry” Should Not Be Used with Imperfectly Registered Images’ in this issue of NeuroImage. We will address three main issues: (i) Dr. Bookstein appears to have misunderstood the objective of voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and the nature of the continuum we referred to. (ii) We agree with him when he states that findings from VBM can pertain to systematic registration errors during spatial normalization. (iii) His argument about voxelwise tests on smooth data holds in the absence of error variance, but is of no consequence when using actual data. We first review the tenets of VBM, paying particular attention to the relationship between VBM and tensor-based morphometry. The last two sections of this response deal with the specific concerns raised by Dr. Bookstein. © 2001 Academic Press

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A Voxel-Based Method for the Statistical Analysis of Gray and White Matter Density Applied to Schizophrenia , 1995, NeuroImage.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Detecting Activations in PET and fMRI: Levels of Inference and Power , 1996, NeuroImage.

[4]  J D Watson,et al.  Nonparametric Analysis of Statistic Images from Functional Mapping Experiments , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[6]  James C. Gee,et al.  Effect of spatial normalization on analysis of functional data , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Incorporating Prior Knowledge into Image Registration , 1997, NeuroImage.

[8]  S. Resnick,et al.  An image-processing system for qualitative and quantitative volumetric analysis of brain images. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[10]  John Suckling,et al.  Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Detecting changes in nonisotropic images , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods , 2000, NeuroImage.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Image registration using a symmetric prior—in three dimensions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[14]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  “Voxel-Based Morphometry” Should Not Be Used with Imperfectly Registered Images , 2001, NeuroImage.