Timing of Adaptive Web Personalization and Its Effects on Online Consumer Behavior

Web personalization allows online merchants to customize Web content to serve the needs of individual customers. Using data mining and clickstream analysis techniques, merchants can now adapt website content in real time to capture the current preferences of online customers. Though the ability to offer adaptive content in real time opens up new business opportunities for online merchants, it also raises questions of timing. One question is when to present personalized content to consumers. Consumers prefer early presentation that eases their selection process, whereas adaptive systems can make better personalized content if they are allowed to collect more consumers' clicks over time. A review of personalization research confirms that little work has been done on these timing issues in the context of personalized services. The current study aims to fill that gap. Drawing on consumer search theory, we develop hypotheses about consumer responses to differences in presentation timing and recommendation type and the interaction between the two. The findings establish that quality improves over the course of an online session but the probability of considering and accepting a given recommendation diminishes over the course of the session. These effects are also shown to interact with consumer expertise, providing insights on the interplay between the different design elements of a personalization strategy.

[1]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Choice behavior in an optional stopping task , 1970 .

[2]  TamKar Yan,et al.  Timing of Adaptive Web Personalization and Its Effects on Online Consumer Behavior , 2011 .

[3]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Knowledge-based Support in a Group Decision Making Context: An Expert-Novice Comparison , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  E-Commerce Product Recommendation Agents: Use, Characteristics, and Impact , 2007, MIS Q..

[5]  Maryanne M. Mowen,et al.  Time and Outcome Valuation: Implications for Marketing Decision Making , 1991 .

[6]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. , 1992 .

[7]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Note: The Influence of Recommendations and Consumer Reviews on Evaluations of Websites , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Trust In and Adoption of Online Recommendation Agents , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Amanda Spink,et al.  A temporal comparison of AltaVista Web searching , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[11]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[12]  David Zilberman,et al.  Learning and Forgetting: Modeling Optimal Product Sampling Over Time , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[13]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Time and Consumer Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Overview , 1976 .

[14]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Personalizaion and Familiarity on Trust and Adoption of Recommendation Agents , 2006, MIS Q..

[16]  Sumit Sarkar,et al.  The Role of the Management Sciences in Research on Personalization , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[17]  John W. Payne,et al.  Effort and Accuracy in Choice , 1985 .

[18]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Best Face Forward: Why Companies Must Improve Their Service Interfaces With Customers , 2005 .

[19]  Wayne D. Hoyer An Examination of Consumer Decision Making for a Common Repeat Purchase Product , 1984 .

[20]  Prasad A. Naik,et al.  Estimating the Half-life of Advertisements , 1999 .

[21]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Model for organizational knowledge creation and strategic use of information: Research Articles , 2005 .

[22]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[23]  S. Engen,et al.  Uniformly best invariant stopping rules , 1987 .

[24]  P. Freeman The Secretary Problem and its Extensions: A Review , 1983 .

[25]  P. Slovic The Construction of Preference , 1995 .

[26]  Tao Luo,et al.  Discovery and Evaluation of Aggregate Usage Profiles for Web Personalization , 2004, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[27]  Ryan O. Murphy,et al.  Sequential Observation and Selection with Rank-Dependent Payoffs: An Experimental Study , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[28]  Barton L. Lipman How to Decide How to Decide How to. . . : Modeling Limited Rationality , 1991 .

[29]  Shuk Ying Ho,et al.  Web Personalization as a Persuasion Strategy: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  Joseph W. Alba,et al.  MEMORY AND DECISION MAKING , 2002 .

[31]  A. Clark,et al.  Relative Income, Happiness and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles , 2007 .

[32]  Glenn J. Browne,et al.  Cognitive Stopping Rules for Terminating Information Search in Online Tasks , 2007, MIS Q..

[33]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[34]  Stacy Wood,et al.  Prior Knowledge and Complacency in New Product Learning , 2002 .

[35]  Morris H. DeGroot,et al.  Some Problems of Optimal Stopping , 1968 .

[36]  Carl F. Mela,et al.  The Long-Term Impact of Promotions on Consumer Stockpiling Behavior , 1998 .

[37]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[38]  Chris Loosley e-Commerce Response Time: A Reference Model , 2000, Int. CMG Conference.

[39]  L. Telser,et al.  Searching for the Lowest Price , 1973 .

[40]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  Consumer involvement, message attention, and the persistence of persuasive impact in a message‐dense environment , 1993 .

[41]  Darryl A. Seale,et al.  Sequential Decision Making with Relative Ranks: An Experimental Investigation of the "Secretary Problem"> , 1997 .

[42]  Shuk Ho,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Effects of Web Personalization at Different Stages of Decision Making , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[43]  B. Ratchford,et al.  Consumer information search revisited: Theory and empirical analysis , 1997 .

[44]  Saoussen Krichen,et al.  An interactive method for the optimal selection problem with two decision makers , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  Edward E. Rigdon,et al.  Play, Flow, and the Online Search Experience , 2004 .

[46]  Alison King Chung Lo,et al.  Consumer Sequential Search: Not Enough or Too Much? , 2003 .

[47]  Christine Moorman,et al.  Subjective Knowledge, Search Locations, and Consumer Choice , 2004 .

[48]  G. Stigler The Economics of Information , 1961, Journal of Political Economy.

[49]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  AMCIS 2002 Panels and Workshops I: Human-Computer Interaction Research in the MIS Discipline , 2002, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Shuk Ying Ho,et al.  Understanding the Impact of Web Personalization on User Information Processing and Decision Outcomes , 2006, MIS Q..

[51]  Mark J. Safferstone Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy , 1999 .

[52]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Self-Service Technologies: Understanding Customer Satisfaction with Technology-Based Service Encounters , 2000 .

[53]  I. Simonson The Effect of Purchase Quantity and Timing on Variety-Seeking Behavior , 1990 .

[54]  Michel Tuan Pham,et al.  Promotion and Prevention in Consumer Decision Making: State of the Art and Theoretical Propositions , 2005 .

[55]  Kirthi Kalyanam,et al.  The perfect message at the perfect moment. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[56]  Gediminas Adomavicius,et al.  Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[57]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets , 1990 .

[58]  Suresha,et al.  Proxy-based acceleration of dynamically generated content on the world wide web: an approach and implementation , 2002, SIGMOD '02.

[59]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Buyers' Choice of Online Search Strategy and Its Managerial Implications , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..