Comparison of silorane and methacrylate-based composites on the polymerization heat generated with different light-curing units and dentin thicknesses.

This study evaluated the temperature variation in the pulp chamber during photoactivation of two restorative composite resins (Filtek P90 silorane-based composite and Heliomolar methacrylate-based composite) with either a quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) or light-emitting diodes (LED) light-curing unit (LCU) and using dentin thicknesses (0.5 and 1.0 mm). Standardized cavities (2x2x2 mm) were prepared in 80 bovine incisors, which were randomly assigned to 8 groups according to the photoactivation method and dentin thickness. Filtek P90 and Heliomolar (both in shade A3) were used with their respective adhesive systems (P90 self-etch primer / P90 adhesive bond and Excite adhesive). All experiments were carried out in a controlled environment (37°C). The temperature variations (°C) were recorded using a digital thermometer attached to a K-type thermocouple. The results were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). For composite/dentin thickness interaction, temperature increase was significantly higher in 0.5 mm dentin thickness (40.07°C) compared with 1.0 mm dentin thickness (39.61°C) for Filtek P90. For composite/LCU interaction, the temperature increase was significantly higher for Filtek P90 (39.21°C - QTH and 40.47°C - LED) compared with Heliomolar (38.40°C - QTH and 39.30°C - LED). The silorane-based composite promoted higher temperature increase in the pulp chamber than the methacrylate-based composite.

[1]  Maryam Khoroushi,et al.  Temperature Rise during Primer, Adhesive, and Composite Resin Photopolymerization of a Low-Shrinkage Composite Resin under Caries-Like Dentin Lesions , 2012, ISRN dentistry.

[2]  Hong Lin,et al.  Comparison between a silorane-based composite and methacrylate-based composites: shrinkage characteristics, thermal properties, gel point and vitrification point. , 2012, Dental materials journal.

[3]  P. C. Saquy,et al.  Effect of different surface penetrating sealants on the roughness of a nanofiller composite resin. , 2012, Brazilian dental journal.

[4]  L. Correr-Sobrinho,et al.  Comparison of silorane and methacrylate-based composite resins on the curing light transmission. , 2010, Brazilian dental journal.

[5]  Julie L. P. Jessop,et al.  Degree of conversion of Filtek Silorane Adhesive System and Clearfil SE Bond within the hybrid and adhesive layer: an in situ Raman analysis. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[6]  R. Consani,et al.  INFLUENCE OF LIGHT ENERGY DENSITY ON HEAT GENERATION DURING PHOTOACTIVATION OF DENTAL COMPOSITES WITH DIFFERENT DENTIN AND COMPOSITE THICKNESS , 2009, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[7]  B. Dzeletovic,et al.  Temperature changes in silorane-, ormocer-, and dimethacrylate-based composites and pulp chamber roof during light-curing. , 2009, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[8]  L. Correr-Sobrinho,et al.  Thermal variations in the pulp chamber associated with composite insertion techniques and light-curing methods. , 2009, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[9]  R. Consani,et al.  Light energy transmission through composite influenced by material shades. , 2009, The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College.

[10]  T. Cordás,et al.  Eating disorders part II: clinical strategies for dental treatment. , 2008, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[11]  L. Correr-Sobrinho,et al.  Influence of light curing unit and ceramic thickness on temperature rise during resin cement photo-activation. , 2008, The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College.

[12]  L. Correr-Sobrinho,et al.  Influence of the light curing unit and thickness of residual dentin on generation of heat during composite photoactivation. , 2008, Journal of oral science.

[13]  R. Moraes,et al.  Effects of ceramic thickness and curing unit on light transmission through leucite-reinforced material and polymerization of dual-cured luting agent. , 2008, Journal of oral science.

[14]  L. Correr-Sobrinho,et al.  Influence of irradiance on the push-out bond strength of composite restorations photoactivated by LED. , 2008, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[15]  A. Uhl,et al.  Influence of heat from light curing units and dental composite polymerization on cells in vitro. , 2006, Journal of dentistry.

[16]  L. Correr-Sobrinho,et al.  Halogen and LED light curing of composite: temperature increase and Knoop hardness , 2006, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[17]  W. Weinmann,et al.  Siloranes in dental composites. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[18]  James V. Crivello,et al.  Photoinduced cationic ring‐opening frontal polymerizations of oxetanes and oxiranes , 2004 .

[19]  R. Loney,et al.  Temperature transmission of high-output light-curing units through dentin. , 2001, Operative dentistry.

[20]  J Sutalo,et al.  Degree of conversion and temperature rise during polymerization of composite resin samples with blue diodes. , 2001, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[21]  F Rueggeberg,et al.  Contemporary issues in photocuring. , 1999, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry. (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995). Supplement.

[22]  R. J. Schnell,et al.  Temperature rise during polymerization of visible light-activated composite resins. , 1988, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[23]  L ZACH,et al.  PULP RESPONSE TO EXTERNALLY APPLIED HEAT. , 1965, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.