Portrait Profiles and the Notion of Agency

Artists tend to draw portraits from an angle so that more of one side of the subject's face is depicted. The tendency to draw more of the left or right side of the face is influenced by gender, social, and personality characteristics of the subjects, and has changed over time. Several hypotheses have been advanced to account for these orientation biases, including effects of maternal imprinting, hemispheric specialization for emotional expression, hemispheric specialization for facial perception, and some form of symbolic communication. None of these hypotheses seem to account adequately for the range of observations reported thus far. I propose an agency hypothesis, which is based on the fact that right-handed subjects tend to conceptualize agents of actions to the left of where they conceptualize recipients of actions. This hypothesis emerged from studies on the interactions of language and space, and seems in accord with the art observations. The agency hypothesis suggests that remarkably simple spatial schemas influence several cognitive domains, including language and aesthetics.

[1]  Marie T Banich,et al.  Asymmetry of perception in free viewing of chimeric faces , 1983, Brain and Cognition.

[2]  David Caplan,et al.  A note on the “word-order problem” in agrammatism , 1983, Brain and Language.

[3]  P Bakan,et al.  Visual asymmetry in perception of faces. , 1973, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Perceptual asymmetries in face recognition , 1985, Brain and Cognition.

[5]  K. M. Heilman,et al.  Asyntactic Thematic Role Assignment: The Use of a Temporal-Spatial Strategy , 1995, Brain and Language.

[6]  Myrna F Schwartz,et al.  The word order problem in agrammatism II. Production , 1980, Brain and Language.

[7]  I. Gordon Left and right in Goya's portraits , 1974, Nature.

[8]  S. Nadeau,et al.  Aphasia and language : theory to practice , 2000 .

[9]  K. Heilman,et al.  Agrammatic Sentence Production: The Use of a Temporal-Spatial Strategy , 1995, Brain and Language.

[10]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  Language and space: some interactions , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  J. P. Mclaughlin,et al.  The roles of handedness and stimulus asymmetry in aesthetic preference , 1992, Brain and Cognition.

[12]  J. P. Mclaughlin,et al.  Salience of Compositional Cues and the Order of Presentation in the Picture Reversal Effect , 1997 .

[13]  O. Grüsser,et al.  Cerebral Lateralization and Some Implications for Art, Aesthetic Perception, and Artistic Creativity , 1988 .

[14]  M. Schwartz,et al.  The word order problem in agrammatism I. Comprehension , 1980, Brain and Language.

[15]  S. Wapner,et al.  The influence of lateral organization on the evaluation of paintings. , 1979, British journal of psychology.

[16]  N. Humphrey,et al.  Turning the Left Cheek , 1973, Nature.

[17]  J. P. Mclaughlin,et al.  Preference for Profile Orientation in Portraits , 1994 .

[18]  A Chatterjee,et al.  Picturing unilateral spatial neglect: viewer versus object centred reference frames. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  S. Segalowitz,et al.  Left and Right in Leonardo's Drawings of Faces , 1993 .

[20]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  Verbs, events and spatial representations , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  N. Humphrey,et al.  Status and the left cheek , 1973 .

[22]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Beauty and the Brain , 1988 .