Metadata subsetting framework

The amount of research data online is growing exponentially, scattered across a multitude of locations and stored in various formats on a wide variety of platforms. The value of metadata which assists us in determining the relevance, location, and accessibility of data and related research, has become correspondingly more important. Although there are a number of international standards that govern the format and structure of metadata in specific disciplines, the complexity of these standards makes it difficult for data owners and clearinghouses to create and manage metadata effectively. The Metadata Subsetting Framework is a system that allows metadata clearinghouses to define a subset of a metadata standard, containing the fields most relevant to the specific domain. The system automatically generates an interface specifically customized for the subset, with capabilities for validating user inputs against constraints expressed in the subset. Implemented as a collection of Java components, the system produces a complete inmemory representation of XML Schema documents expressing the structural and data constraints of a subsetted metadata standard. A knowledgeable user builds the subset by manipulating these constraints via a web-based interface. Subsetting makes the metadata entry process easier and less error-prone, thereby improving the quality of metadata.

[1]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  The art of navigating through hypertext , 1990, CACM.

[2]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey , 1987, Computer.

[3]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Semantic Issues in Multidatabase Systems - Preface by the Special Issue Editor , 1991, SIGMOD Rec..

[4]  William K. Michener,et al.  NONGEOSPATIAL METADATA FOR THE ECOLOGICAL SCIENCES , 1997 .

[5]  B. Clinton Executive Order 12906: Coordinating Geographic Data Acquisition and Access: The National Spatial Data Infrastructure , 1994 .

[6]  W. Buxton Human-Computer Interaction , 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[7]  Andrea Zisman,et al.  An Information Discovery Process for Interoperable Heterogeneous Databases , 1996 .

[8]  Andreas Girgensohn,et al.  Experiences in developing collaborative applications using the World Wide Web “shell” , 1996, HYPERTEXT '96.

[9]  Cherri M. Pancake,et al.  "Humane" Interfaces to Improve the Usability of Data Clearinghouses , 2002, GIScience.

[10]  Adam Farquhar,et al.  Using the Web instead of a window system , 1996, CHI.

[11]  Susan Weinschenk,et al.  Guidelines for Enterprise-Wide Gui Design , 1995 .

[12]  William D. Milheim,et al.  Screen Design for Computer-Based Training and Interactive Video: Practical Suggestions and Overall Guidelines. , 1992 .

[13]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Designing for error , 1987 .

[14]  Yiya Yang,et al.  Anatomy of the Design of an Undo Support Facility , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[15]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Multimedia Data Management: Using Metadata to Integrate and Apply Digital Media , 1998 .

[16]  J. Chen,et al.  Advances and Applications of GIS in China , 2002 .

[17]  Alfred V. Aho,et al.  Compilers: Principles, Techniques, and Tools , 1986, Addison-Wesley series in computer science / World student series edition.

[18]  Keith Duncan,et al.  Cognitive Engineering , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[19]  John Millar Carroll The Nurnberg Funnel: Designing Minimalist Instruction for Practical Computer Skill , 1990 .

[20]  Harlan J. Onsrud,et al.  Sharing geographic information , 1995 .

[21]  S. Pastoor,et al.  Legibility and Subjective Preference for Color Combinations in Text , 1990, Human factors.

[22]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[23]  D. Norman Categorization of action slips. , 1981 .

[24]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Usability Engineering in Practice , 2002 .