Variable Damping Force Tunnel for Gait Training Using ALEX III

Haptic feedback not only affects the quality of training but can also influence the physical design of robotic gait trainers by determining how much force needs to be applied to the user and the nature of the force. This letter presents the design of a variable damping force tunnel and explores the effect of the shape and strength of the damping field using ALEX III, a treadmill-based exoskeleton developed at Columbia University. The study consists of 32 healthy subjects who were trained for 40 min in the device. The subjects were trained to follow a footpath with a 50% increase in step height, so the foot would have 1.5 times the ground clearance. Subjects were assigned to one of four groups: linear high, linear low, parabolic high, and parabolic low. Linear or parabolic denotes the shape of the damping field, and high or low denotes the rate of change (strength) of the field based on error. It is shown that the new controller is capable of inducing gait adaptations in healthy individuals while walking in the device. All groups showed adaptations in step height, while only the high strength groups showed changes in normalized error area, a measure of how closely the desired path was followed.

[1]  S. Agrawal,et al.  Effects of Complementary Auditory Feedback in Robot-Assisted Lower Extremity Motor Adaptation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  Cordula Werner,et al.  Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[3]  Vahab Youssofzadeh,et al.  Directed neural connectivity changes in robot-assisted gait training: A partial Granger causality analysis , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  M. Jurak,et al.  Passive robotic movement therapy of the spastic hemiparetic arm with REHAROB: report of the first clinical test and the follow-up system improvement , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[5]  Na Young Kim,et al.  Effect of Robotic-Assisted Gait Training in Patients With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury , 2014, Annals of rehabilitation medicine.

[6]  Sunil Kumar Agrawal,et al.  Rehabilitation Exoskeleton Design: Exploring the Effect of the Anterior Lunge Degree of Freedom , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[7]  Sheng-Che Yen,et al.  Robotic resistance treadmill training improves locomotor function in human spinal cord injury: a pilot study. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  I. Schwartz,et al.  The Effectiveness of Locomotor Therapy Using Robotic‐Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2009, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[9]  Raymond K Y Tong,et al.  A Pilot Study of Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial of Gait Training in Subacute Stroke Patients With Partial Body-Weight Support Electromechanical Gait Trainer and Functional Electrical Stimulation: Six-Month Follow-Up , 2008, Stroke.

[10]  R. Magill Motor learning and control : concepts and applications , 2004 .

[11]  Bram Koopman,et al.  Selective control of gait subtasks in robotic gait training: foot clearance support in stroke survivors with a powered exoskeleton , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[12]  Janice J Eng,et al.  Using Robot-Applied Resistance to Augment Body-Weight–Supported Treadmill Training in an Individual With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury , 2011, Physical Therapy.

[13]  M. Lewek,et al.  Allowing Intralimb Kinematic Variability During Locomotor Training Poststroke Improves Kinematic Consistency: A Subgroup Analysis From a Randomized Clinical Trial , 2009, Physical Therapy.

[14]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  Elizabeth A. Brackbill,et al.  Robot-assisted modifications of gait in healthy individuals , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  F. Müller,et al.  Effects of Locomotion Training With Assistance of a Robot-Driven Gait Orthosis in Hemiparetic Patients After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study , 2007, Stroke.

[17]  Sunil K Agrawal,et al.  Effect of robotic performance-based error-augmentation versus error-reduction training on the gait of healthy individuals. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[18]  S Hesse,et al.  Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS) , 2007, Clinical rehabilitation.

[19]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  Active robotic training improves locomotor function in a stroke survivor , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[21]  J. Hidler,et al.  Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[22]  Junji Furusho,et al.  Basic study on rehabilitation training system using ER actuators , 1999, IEEE SMC'99 Conference Proceedings. 1999 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.99CH37028).

[23]  V. Dietz,et al.  Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[24]  J. Higginson,et al.  Assist-as-Needed Robot-Aided Gait Training Improves Walking Function in Individuals Following Stroke , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[25]  Felix C Huang,et al.  Manual skill generalization enhanced by negative viscosity. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Sunil Kumar Agrawal,et al.  Degrees-of-freedom of a robotic exoskeleton and human adaptation to new gait templates , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[27]  J. Patton,et al.  Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  F. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[30]  L. Ada,et al.  Strengthening interventions increase strength and improve activity after stroke: a systematic review. , 2006, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[31]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Central representation of time during motor learning. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  T. Demott,et al.  Enhanced Gait-Related Improvements After Therapist- Versus Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training in Subjects With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study , 2008, Stroke.

[33]  Carlo Zancanaro,et al.  "Amplification of error": a rapidly effective method for motor performance improvement , 2008 .

[34]  Jill M. Landry,et al.  A cable-driven locomotor training system for restoration of gait in human SCI. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[35]  Sunil Kumar Agrawal,et al.  Adaptive assist-as-needed controller to improve gait symmetry in robot-assisted gait training , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[36]  Sunil Kumar Agrawal,et al.  ALEX III: A novel robotic platform with 12 DOFs for human gait training , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[37]  Volker Dietz,et al.  Spinal Cord Injury Swing Phase Resistance Enhances Flexor Muscle Activity During Treadmill Locomotion in Incomplete , 2008 .

[38]  Mark Ferraro,et al.  Continuous passive motion improves shoulder joint integrity following stroke , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[39]  Kelly P Westlake,et al.  Pilot study of Lokomat versus manual-assisted treadmill training for locomotor recovery post-stroke , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[40]  V. Dietz,et al.  Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a multicenter trial. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[41]  Sunil K. Agrawal,et al.  Improving transparency of powered exoskeletons using force/torque sensors on the supporting cuffs , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[42]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Robot-enhanced motor learning: accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[43]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Comparison of error-amplification and haptic-guidance training techniques for learning of a timing-based motor task by healthy individuals , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Robotic movement training as an optimization problem: designing a controller that assists only as needed , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[45]  James L. Patton,et al.  Augmented Dynamics and Motor Exploration as Training for Stroke , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.