An assessment study of the wavelet-based index of magnetic storm activity (WISA) and its comparison to the Dst index

Abstract A wavelet-based index of storm activity (WISA) has been recently developed [Jach, A., Kokoszka, P., Sojka, L., Zhu, L., 2006. Wavelet-based index of magnetic storm activity. Journal of Geophysical Research 111, A09215, doi:10.1029/2006JA011635 ] to complement the traditional Dst index. The new index can be computed automatically by using the wavelet-based statistical procedure without human intervention on the selection of quiet days and the removal of secular variations. In addition, the WISA is flexible on data stretch and has a higher temporal resolution (1 min), which can provide a better description of the dynamical variations of magnetic storms. In this work, we perform a systematic assessment study on the WISA index. First, we statistically compare the WISA to the Dst for various quiet and disturbed periods and analyze the differences of their spectral features. Then we quantitatively assess the flexibility of the WISA on data stretch and study the effects of varying number of stations on the index. In addition, the ability of the WISA for handling the missing data is also quantitatively assessed. The assessment results show that the hourly averaged WISA index can describe storm activities equally well as the Dst index, but its full automation, high flexibility on data stretch, easiness of using the data from varying number of stations, high temporal resolution, and high tolerance to missing data from individual station can be very valuable and essential for real-time monitoring of the dynamical variations of magnetic storm activities and space weather applications, thus significantly complementing the existing Dst index.

[1]  Wallace H. Campbell,et al.  Geomagnetic storms, the Dst ring-current myth and lognormal distributions , 1996 .

[2]  P. Kokoszka,et al.  Wavelet-Based Index of Magnetic Storm Activity , 2006 .

[3]  W. Campbell.  Failure of Dst index fields to represent a ring current , 2004 .

[4]  A. Lui,et al.  Time‐frequency decomposition of signals in a current disruption event , 1997 .

[5]  Todd R. Ogden,et al.  Wavelet Methods for Time Series Analysis , 2002 .

[6]  Manuel Grande,et al.  Current understanding of magnetic storms: storm-substorm relationships , 1998 .

[7]  G. Rostoker.  Effects of substorms on the stormtime ring current index Dst , 2000 .

[8]  Y. Kamide,et al.  Correlation between particle injections observed at geosynchronous orbit and the Dst index during geomagnetic storms , 2004 .

[9]  Andrzej Krankowski,et al.  Wavelet analysis and forecasting of VTEC obtained with GPS observations over European latitudes , 2005 .

[10]  P. Mayaud,et al.  Derivation, Meaning, and Use of Geomagnetic Indices , 1980 .

[11]  Margarete Oliveira Domingues,et al.  On wavelet techniques in atmospheric sciences , 2005 .

[12]  N. Mitchell,et al.  A study of tidal and planetary wave periodicities present in midlatitude sporadic E layers , 2004 .

[13]  G. Rangarajan.  Indices of geomagnetic activity. , 1989 .

[14]  M. Sugiura,et al.  Provisional hourly values of equatorial Dst for 1971 , 1972 .

[15]  W. Campbell.  Comment on “Current understanding of magnetic storms: Storm‐substorm relationships,” by Y. Kamide et al. , 1999 .

[16]  S. Billings,et al.  Prediction of the Dst index using multiresolution wavelet models , 2004 .

[17]  W. Kertz.  RING CURRENT VARIATIONS DURING THE IGY , 1964 .

[18]  O. Mendes,et al.  Effects of the number of stations and time resolution on Dst derivation , 2006 .

[19]  M. Sugiura,et al.  Provisional hourly values of equatorial Dst for 1964, 1965, 1966, and 1967 , 1969 .

[20]  Masahisa Sugiura,et al.  Hourly values of equatorial dst for the igy , 1963 .