The phenotypic determinants of diet variation between divergent lineages of threespine stickleback.

Lineages with independent evolutionary histories often differ in both their morphology and diet. Experimental work has improved our understanding of the links between the biomechanics of morphological traits and foraging performance (trait utility). However, because the expression of foraging-relevant traits and their utility can be highly context-specific, it is often unclear how dietary divergence arises from evolved phenotypic differences. Here, we explore the phenotypic causes of dietary divergence between two genetically and phenotypically divergent lineages of threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) with independent evolutionary histories of freshwater colonization and adaptation. First, using individuals from a line-cross breeding design, we conducted 150 common-garden foraging trials with a community of multiple prey species and performed morphological and behavioral analyses to test for prey-specific trait utility. Second, we tested if the traits that explain variation in foraging performance among all individuals could also explain the dietary divergence between the lineages. Overall, we found evidence for the utility of several foraging traits, but these traits did not explain the observed dietary divergence between the lineages in a common garden. This work suggests that evolved dietary divergence results not only from differences in morphology but also from divergence in behaviors that underlie prey capture success in species-rich prey communities.

[1]  O. Seehausen,et al.  Fit and fatty freshwater fish: contrasting polyunsaturated fatty acid phenotypes between hybridizing stickleback lineages , 2021, Oikos.

[2]  Moritz D. Lürig phenopype: a phenotyping pipeline for Python , 2021, bioRxiv.

[3]  M. Muñoz The Bogert effect, a factor in evolution , 2021, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  J. Geist,et al.  Feeding Ecology of Invasive Three-Spined Stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) in Relation to Native Juvenile Eurasian Perch (Perca fluviatilis) in the Pelagic Zone of Upper Lake Constance , 2021, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[5]  Kara L Feilich,et al.  Linking ecomechanical models and functional traits to understand phenotypic diversity. , 2021, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  Jeremy R. Wang,et al.  A vertebrate adaptive radiation is assembled from an ancient and disjunct spatiotemporal landscape , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  D. Marques,et al.  Threespine Stickleback in Lake Constance: The Ecology and Genomic Substrate of a Recent Invasion , 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[8]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Admixture between old lineages facilitated contemporary ecological speciation in Lake Constance stickleback , 2019, Nature Communications.

[9]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  An experimental test of how parasites of predators can influence trophic cascades and ecosystem functioning. , 2019, Ecology.

[10]  M. Muñoz The Evolutionary Dynamics of Mechanically Complex Systems , 2019, Integrative and comparative biology.

[11]  M. McGee,et al.  Rapid Divergence of Predator Functional Traits Affects Prey Composition in Aquatic Communities , 2019, The American Naturalist.

[12]  J. Merilä,et al.  Worldwide phylogeny of three-spined sticklebacks. , 2018, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[13]  D. Rokyta,et al.  Local prey community composition and genetic distance predict venom divergence among populations of the northern Pacific rattlesnake (Crotalus oreganus) , 2018, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[14]  Cole J. Thompson,et al.  Many‐to‐one form‐to‐function mapping weakens parallel morphological evolution , 2017, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  O. Seehausen,et al.  Transgenerational selection driven by divergent ecological impacts of hybridizing lineages , 2017, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[16]  D. Pfennig,et al.  Genetic accommodation in the wild: evolution of gene expression plasticity during character displacement , 2017, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[17]  Paul-Christian Bürkner,et al.  Advanced Bayesian Multilevel Modeling with the R Package brms , 2017, R J..

[18]  R. Holzman,et al.  Mechanical Transgressive Segregation and the Rapid Origin of Trophic Novelty , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[19]  Marco Gamba,et al.  BORIS: a free, versatile open‐source event‐logging software for video/audio coding and live observations , 2016 .

[20]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Genomics of Rapid Incipient Speciation in Sympatric Threespine Stickleback , 2016, PLoS genetics.

[21]  K. McCann,et al.  Predator Diet and Trophic Position Modified with Altered Habitat Morphology , 2016, PloS one.

[22]  A. Hendry,et al.  Does plasticity enhance or dampen phenotypic parallelism? A test with three lake–stream stickleback pairs , 2016, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[23]  R. Walter,et al.  Hybrid ‘superswarm’ leads to rapid divergence and establishment of populations during a biological invasion , 2015, Molecular ecology.

[24]  T. Garland,et al.  Genetic approaches in comparative and evolutionary physiology. , 2015, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[25]  O. Seehausen,et al.  Contemporary ecotypic divergence during a recent range expansion was facilitated by adaptive introgression , 2014, Journal of Evolutionary Biology.

[26]  O. Seehausen,et al.  Quick divergence but slow convergence during ecotype formation in lake and stream stickleback pairs of variable age , 2014, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[27]  M. Arnegard,et al.  Genetics of ecological divergence during speciation , 2014, Nature.

[28]  D. Schluter,et al.  Functional basis of ecological divergence in sympatric stickleback , 2013, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[29]  O. Seehausen,et al.  Repeated and predictable patterns of ecotypic differentiation during a biological invasion: lake–stream divergence in parapatric Swiss stickleback , 2013, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[30]  L. Teresi,et al.  Bite of the cats: relationships between functional integration and mechanical performance as revealed by mandible geometry. , 2013, Systematic biology.

[31]  D. Ayre,et al.  Despite prolonged association in closed populations, an intertidal predator does not prefer abundant local prey to novel prey , 2013 .

[32]  Walter Salzburger,et al.  Convergent Evolution within an Adaptive Radiation of Cichlid Fishes , 2012, Current Biology.

[33]  O. Seehausen,et al.  Evidence of Adaptive Evolutionary Divergence during Biological Invasion , 2012, PloS one.

[34]  Márcio S Araújo,et al.  The ecological causes of individual specialisation. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[35]  A. Hendry,et al.  Constraints on speciation suggested by comparing lake‐stream stickleback divergence across two continents , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[36]  O. Seehausen,et al.  Hybridization between distant lineages increases adaptive variation during a biological invasion: stickleback in Switzerland , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[37]  R. Thomas,et al.  The response of fish to novel prey: evidence that dietary conservatism is not restricted to birds , 2010 .

[38]  D. Worth,et al.  Local adaptation along a continuous coastline: prey recruitment drives differentiation in a predatory snail. , 2010, Ecology.

[39]  Michael C. Marshall,et al.  Local adaptation in Trinidadian guppies alters ecosystem processes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  A. Herrel,et al.  Rapid large-scale evolutionary divergence in morphology and performance associated with exploitation of a different dietary resource , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Peter Wainwright,et al.  Suction feeding mechanics, performance, and diversity in fishes. , 2007, Integrative and comparative biology.

[42]  M. W. McCoy,et al.  Size correction: comparing morphological traits among populations and environments , 2006, Oecologia.

[43]  M. Westneat,et al.  Evolution of Levers and Linkages in the Feeding Mechanisms of Fishes1 , 2004, Integrative and comparative biology.

[44]  A. Herrel,et al.  Omnivory in lacertid lizards: adaptive evolution or constraint? , 2004, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[45]  Michael E Alfaro,et al.  EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS OF COMPLEX BIOMECHANICAL SYSTEMS: AN EXAMPLE USING THE FOUR‐BAR MECHANISM , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[46]  Louie H. Yang,et al.  The Ecology of Individuals: Incidence and Implications of Individual Specialization , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[47]  H. Rundle,et al.  Speciation in nature : the threespine stickleback model systems , 2002 .

[48]  T. Parchman,et al.  DIVERSIFYING COEVOLUTION BETWEEN CROSSBILLS AND BLACK SPRUCE ON NEWFOUNDLAND , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[49]  B. Robinson Habitat Heterogeneity and Tube-Dwelling Behavior of Larval Chironomidae: Implications for Prey Vulnerablilty , 2000 .

[50]  P. Wainwright,et al.  Predicting patterns of prey use from morphology of fishes , 1995, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[51]  A. Hershey Tubes and foraging behavior in larval Chironomidae: implications for predator avoidance , 1987, Oecologia.

[52]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  Morphology, Performance and Fitness , 1983 .

[53]  J. Merilä,et al.  Estimating uncertainty in divergence times among three-spined stickleback clades using the multispecies coalescent. , 2019, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[54]  R. Svanbäck,et al.  Gut length plasticity in perch: into the bowels of resource polymorphisms , 2007 .

[55]  B. Grant,et al.  Darwin's finches: population variation and natural selection. , 1976 .

[56]  T. Garland,et al.  Ecological Morphology of Locomotor Performance in Squamate Reptiles , 2022 .