To be or not to be...included in an event file: integration and retrieval of distractors in stimulus-response episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping.

The binding of stimulus and response features into stimulus-response (S-R) episodes or "event files" is a basic process for the efficient control of behavior. However, relevant information is usually accompanied by information that is irrelevant for the selection of action. Recent studies showed that even irrelevant information is bound into event files. In this study, we investigated the boundary conditions of distractor-response binding and subsequent distractor-based response retrieval processes. In particular, we tested whether the inclusion of distractor information into S-R episodes is modulated by whether the distractor and target stimulus are perceived as belonging to the same object or as belonging to different objects. We argue that distracting information is only bound into S-R episodes if it is perceived as belonging to the same object as the relevant information, whereas no binding occurs when the distracting information is perceived as belonging to a separate object. In 6 experiments, we found evidence for the modulation of distractor-response bindings according to perceptual grouping principles.

[1]  V. Bruce,et al.  Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology and Ecology , 1985 .

[2]  B. Hommel How much attention does an event file need? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Steven Yantis,et al.  An interactive race model of divided attention. , 1991 .

[4]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[5]  Ruth Kimchi,et al.  Perceptual grouping operates independently of attentional selection: Evidence from hemispatial neglect , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Christian Frings,et al.  Binding targets’ responses to distractors’ locations: Distractor response bindings in a location-priming task , 2010 .

[7]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  Christian Frings,et al.  On the decay of distractor-response episodes. , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[9]  A. Treisman Perceiving and re-perceiving objects. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[10]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Role of Gestalt grouping in selective attention: Evidence from the Stroop task , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  S. Tipper,et al.  A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. , 1994 .

[12]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Disruption to word or letter processing? The origins of case-mixing effects. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis. , 1979 .

[15]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[16]  E. Thorndike The fundamentals of learning , 1972 .

[17]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  A. Treisman Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  The Changing Pattern of Perceptual Analytic Strategies and Response Selection with Practice in a Two-Choice Reaction time task , 1978, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Axel Buchner,et al.  Evidence for episodic retrieval of inadequate prime responses in auditory negative priming. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  B. Hommel Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response Episodes , 1998 .

[22]  R. Kimchi,et al.  Perceptual grouping and attention: Not all groupings are equal , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  T. Carr,et al.  Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language , 1994 .

[24]  D. Wentura,et al.  Distractor Repetitions Retrieve Previous Responses to Targets , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  M Behrmann,et al.  Spatial attention does not require preattentive grouping. , 1997, Neuropsychology.

[26]  B. DeSchepper,et al.  Costs and benefits of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  W. Köhler Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology , 1970 .

[28]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Negative priming depends on ease of selection , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Thomas M. Spalek,et al.  The Left-to-Right Bias in Inhibition of Return Is Due to the Direction of Reading , 2005, Psychological science.

[30]  J. Driver,et al.  New indirect measures of “inattentive” visual grouping in a change-detection task , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[32]  Michael G. Reynolds,et al.  To group or not to group: an ecological consideration of the stroop effect. , 2010, Experimental psychology.

[33]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  G. Baylis,et al.  Movement and visual attention: the spotlight metaphor breaks down. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  P. Wühr,et al.  Prime display offset modulates negative priming only for easy-selection tasks , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[36]  Sheng He,et al.  Horizontal and vertical asymmetry in visual spatial crowding effects. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[37]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  The role of vertical mirror symmetry in visual shape detection. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[38]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  L. Postman,et al.  Psychology in the making : histories of selected research problems , 1962 .

[40]  Charles H. Judd,et al.  The Fundamentals of Learning. Edward L. Thorndike , The Staff of the Division of Psychology of the Institute of Educational Research of Teachers College, Columbia UniversityHuman Learning. Edward L. Thorndike , 1933 .

[41]  Wilma Koutstaal,et al.  Perceive-decide-act, perceive-decide-act: how abstract is repetition-related decision learning? , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  Carina Giesen,et al.  Affective matching moderates S–R binding , 2011, Cognition & emotion.

[43]  Catherine Tallon-Baudry,et al.  Visual Grouping and the Focusing of Attention Induce Gamma-band Oscillations at Different Frequencies in Human Magnetoencephalogram Signals , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  B. Hommel Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  Christian Frings,et al.  On distractor-repetition benefits in the negative-priming paradigm , 2007 .

[46]  Axel Buchner,et al.  Prime retrieval of motor responses in negative priming. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.