Social Learning, Self-Control, and Substance Abuse by Eighth Grade Students: A Tale of Two Cities

Social learning theory has been used to explain substance abuse among adolescents literally from its inception in the 1960s. This theory suggests that basically good children learn to become substance abusers due to such social forces as internalized definitions supportive of delinquent behavior, the influence of delinquent peers, the presence of powerful social reinforcers, and the absence of adequate social punishers. Self-control theory, a more recent theoretical entry, has rather different views about adolescent misbehavior: children become delinquent owing to inadequate parenting and poorly developed self-controls. Taken together these two perspectives should provide unique insights into the self-reported substance abuse of eighth grade students in two rather different cities: Phoenix, Arizona, and Las Cruces, New Mexico, despite the considerable differences between the two cities. We address the following question: to what extent do social learning theory and self-control theory provide insights into the city-specific patterns of self-reported substance abuse. We also review the theoretical and policy implications of our findings.

[1]  L. Lanza-Kaduce,et al.  Social learning and deviant behavior: a specific test of a general theory. , 1979, American sociological review.

[2]  David Huizinga,et al.  GANGS, DRUGS, AND DELINQUENCY IN A SURVEY OF URBAN YOUTH* , 1993 .

[3]  L. Lanza-Kaduce,et al.  Norm Qualities and Adolescent Drinking and Drug Behavior: The Effects of Norm Quality and Reference Group on Using and Abusing Alcohol and Marijuana , 1982 .

[4]  Alan J. Lizotte,et al.  The Role of Juvenile Gangs in Facilitating Delinquent Behavior , 1993 .

[5]  Gresham M. Sykes,et al.  Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. , 1957 .

[6]  J. Braithwaite The state of criminology: Theoretical , 1989 .

[7]  L. Lanza-Kaduce,et al.  Community Context and Theories of Deviant Behavior: An Examination of Social Learning and Social Bonding Theories , 1984 .

[8]  Harold G. Grasmick,et al.  Testing the Core Empirical Implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime , 1993 .

[9]  D. Clason,et al.  Social learning and adolescent deviance abstention: Toward understanding the reasons for initiating, quitting, and avoiding drugs , 1993 .

[10]  L. Winfree,et al.  Understanding Crime: Theory and Practice , 1996 .

[11]  Betty Pfefferbaum,et al.  RISK-TAKING AND SELF-CONTROL: SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL CORRELATES OF DELINQUENCY , 1993 .

[12]  Delbert S. Elliott,et al.  Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use , 1985 .

[13]  Ronald L. Akers,et al.  SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY AND ALCOHOL BEHAVIOR AMONG THE ELDERLY , 1989 .

[14]  Ronald E. Vogel,et al.  Active Parental Consent in School-Based Research , 1996, Evaluation review.

[15]  G. Larry Mays,et al.  Social Learning Theory, Self-Reported Delinquency, and Youth Gangs , 1994 .

[16]  Ronald L. Akers,et al.  Deviant behavior;: A social learning approach , 1973 .

[17]  Paul S. Maxim,et al.  Drinking and Driving, Self-Control, and Gender: Testing a General Theory of Crime , 1993 .

[18]  John K. Cochran,et al.  Is the Religiosity-Delinquency Relationship Spurious? A Test of Arousal and Social Control Theories , 1994 .

[19]  J. Inciardi Heroin Use and Street Crime , 1979 .

[20]  L. Winfree,et al.  Differential associations and definitions: a panel study of youthful drinking behavior. , 1990, The International journal of the addictions.