Analysis of the diametrical compression test and the applicability to plastically deforming materials

The effect of contact flattening and material properties on the fracture stress calculation for the diametrical compression test used to evaluate compact strength was examined through finite element simulations. Two-dimensional simulations were carried out using linear elastic, elastoplastic, and porous elastoplastic models with commercial finite element software. A parametric study was performed by varying the elastic modulus (E), Poisson's ratio (ν), contact frictional coefficient (μ), yield stress (σyield), and compact relative density (RD). Stress contours generated from these simulations were compared to the Hertzian and Hondros analytical expressions. Linear elastic simulations show excellent agreement with the analytical solutions. Significant deviation, however, occurs for the elastoplastic and porous elastoplastic simulations at larger diametrical strain with material plasticity. A better understanding of the stress-state of diametrically loaded plastically deforming disks has been demonstrated in this computational and experimental work. Results from these finite element simulations confirm that the standard tensile strength calculation: σf = 2P/π Dt, is suitable for linear elastic materials. However, the incorporation of plasticity into the material model results in a significant change in the maximum principal stress field (magnitude and location) rendering the Hertzian estimate of tensile strength invalid. A map to check the validity of the Hertzian equation is proposed.

[1]  A. Zambon,et al.  Diametral compression testing of metal matrix composites , 1994 .

[2]  Stress distribution in diametral compression tests. , 1981, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[3]  Shiro Biwa,et al.  An analysis of fully plastic Brinell indentation , 1995 .

[4]  M. Fahad,et al.  Stresses and failure in the diametral compression test , 1996, Journal of Materials Science.

[5]  Jm Newton,et al.  Tensile fracture of doubly-convex cylindrical discs under diametral loading , 1988 .

[6]  G. Alderborn,et al.  Pharmaceutical Powder Compaction Technology , 1995 .

[7]  Angelika Brückner-Foit,et al.  Discrimination of multiaxiality criteria with the Brazilian disc test , 1997 .

[8]  A. R. Rosenfield,et al.  Mixed-Mode Fracture of Ceramics in Diametral Compression , 1986 .

[9]  H. Kristensen,et al.  Mechanical properties of moist agglomerates in relation to granulation mechanisms part I. Deformability of moist, densified agglomerates , 1985 .

[10]  L. J NEERGAARD,et al.  Effective volume of specimens in diametral compression , 1997 .

[11]  R. Rowe,et al.  The Young's modulus of pharmaceutical materials , 1987 .

[12]  J. Newton,et al.  Stress distributions in doubly convex cylindrical discs under diametral loading , 1989 .

[13]  J. Newton,et al.  Determination of tablet strength by the diametral-compression test. , 1970, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[14]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  Theory of elasticity , 1975 .

[15]  P. York,et al.  The Poisson's ratio of microcrystalline cellulose , 1994 .

[16]  P. Stanley,et al.  Mechanical strength testing of compacted powders. , 2001, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[17]  D. Maugis Contact, Adhesion and Rupture of Elastic Solids , 2000 .

[18]  K. Shinohara,et al.  A theoretical model of the effect of distributed loading on the tensile strength of agglomerates as measured in the diametral compression test , 1982 .