Supermodeling in Simulation of Melanoma Progression

Supermodeling is an interesting and non-standard concept used recently for simulation of complex and non-linear systems such as climate and weather dynamics. It consists in coupling of a few imperfect sub-models to create the superior supermodel. We discuss here the supermodeling strategy in the context of tumor growth simulation. To check its adaptive flexibility we have developed a basic, but still computationally complex, 3-D modeling framework of melanoma growth. The supermodel of melanoma consists of a few coupled sub-models, which differ in values of a parameter responsible for tumor cells and extracellular matrix interactions. We demonstrate that due to synchronization of submodels, the supermodel is able to simulate qualitatively different scenarios of cancer growth than those observed for sub-models when run separately. These scenarios correspond to the basic types of melanoma cancer. This property makes the supermodel very flexible to follow and to predict real cases of melanoma development through learning the coupling coefficients between sub-models from real data. On the basis of preliminary simulation results, we discuss the prospects of supermodeling strategy as a promising coupling factor between formal and data-based models of tumor.

[1]  Alexander R. A. Anderson,et al.  Mathematical modelling of cancer cell invasion of tissue , 2008, Math. Comput. Model..

[2]  H Rieger,et al.  Physical determinants of vascular network remodeling during tumor growth , 2010, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[3]  Paul H. Hiemstra,et al.  Complete synchronization of chaotic atmospheric models by connecting only a subset of state space , 2012 .

[4]  Ethem Alpaydin,et al.  Introduction to machine learning , 2004, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[5]  Gregory S Duane,et al.  Synchronization of extended systems from internal coherence. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Hong Li,et al.  Data Assimilation as Synchronization of Truth and Model: Experiments with the Three-Variable Lorenz System* , 2006 .

[7]  C. S. Manning Heterogeneity in melanoma and the microenvironment , 2013 .

[8]  Jeffrey B. Weiss,et al.  Synchronicity in predictive modelling: a new view of data assimilation , 2006 .

[9]  Gabriel A. Wainer Editorial for Principles of Advanced Discrete Simulation , 2015, TOMC.

[10]  Natalia L. Komarova,et al.  Dynamics of Cancer: Mathematical Foundations of Oncology , 2014 .

[11]  Vittorio Cristini,et al.  Multiscale cancer modeling. , 2010, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[12]  Ljupco Kocarev,et al.  Improved modeling by coupling imperfect models , 2012 .

[13]  R.Wcisło,et al.  A new model of tumor progression based on the concept of complex automata driven by particle dynamics , 2008 .

[14]  Nicola Bellomo,et al.  On the foundations of cancer modelling: Selected topics, speculations, and perspectives , 2008 .

[15]  Kyle M. Jones,et al.  Evaluations of Tumor Acidosis Within In Vivo Tumor Models Using Parametric Maps Generated with AcidoCEST MRI , 2015, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[16]  David A. Yuen,et al.  A 3-D model of tumor progression based on complex automata driven by particle dynamics , 2009, Journal of Molecular Modeling.

[17]  Yee Whye Teh,et al.  A Fast Learning Algorithm for Deep Belief Nets , 2006, Neural Computation.

[18]  Olaf Wolkenhauer,et al.  Enabling multiscale modeling in systems medicine , 2014, Genome Medicine.

[19]  David A. Yuen,et al.  PAM: Particle Automata in Modeling of Multiscale Biological Systems , 2016, TOMC.

[20]  S. McDougall,et al.  Mathematical modeling of tumor-induced angiogenesis. , 2006, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[21]  Vittorio Cristini,et al.  Multiscale Modeling of Cancer: An Integrated Experimental and Mathematical Modeling Approach , 2010 .