Effective control of dengue vectors with curtains and water container covers treated with insecticide in Mexico and Venezuela: cluster randomised trials

Abstract Objectives To measure the impact on the dengue vector population (Aedes aegypti) and disease transmission of window curtains and water container covers treated with insecticide. Design Cluster randomised controlled trial based on entomological surveys and, for Trujillo only, serological survey. In addition, each site had a non-randomised external control. Setting 18 urban sectors in Veracruz (Mexico) and 18 in Trujillo (Venezuela). Participants 4743 inhabitants (1095 houses) in Veracruz and 5306 inhabitants (1122 houses) in Trujillo. Intervention Sectors were paired according to entomological indices, and one sector in each pair was randomly allocated to receive treatment. In Veracruz, the intervention comprised curtains treated with lambdacyhalothrin and water treatment with pyriproxyfen chips (an insect growth regulator). In Trujillo, the intervention comprised curtains treated with longlasting deltamethrin (PermaNet) plus water jar covers of the same material. Follow-up surveys were conducted at intervals, with the final survey after 12 months in Veracruz and nine months in Trujillo. Main outcome measures Reduction in entomological indices, specifically the Breteau and house indices. Results In both study sites, indices at the end of the trial were significantly lower than those at baseline, though with no significant differences between control and intervention arms. The mean Breteau index dropped from 60% (intervention clusters) and 113% (control) to 7% (intervention) and 12% (control) in Veracruz and from 38% to 11% (intervention) and from 34% to 17% (control) in Trujillo. The pupae per person and container indices showed similar patterns. In contrast, in nearby communities not in the trial the entomological indices followed the rainfall pattern. The intervention reduced mosquito populations in neighbouring control clusters (spill-over effect); and houses closer to treated houses were less likely to have infestations than those further away. This created a community effect whereby mosquito numbers were reduced throughout the study site. The observed effects were probably associated with the use of materials treated with insecticide at both sites because in Veracruz, people did not accept and use the pyriproxyfen chips. Conclusion Window curtains and domestic water container covers treated with insecticide can reduce densities of dengue vectors to low levels and potentially affect dengue transmission.

[1]  A. Lenhart,et al.  Building a better ovitrap for detecting Aedes aegypti oviposition. , 2005, Acta tropica.

[2]  V. S. Nam,et al.  New strategy against Aedes aegypti in Vietnam , 2005, The Lancet.

[3]  L. Waller,et al.  Applied Spatial Statistics for Public Health Data , 2004 .

[4]  M. Kolczak,et al.  Effect of permethrin-treated bed nets on the spatial distribution of malaria vectors in western Kenya. , 2003, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[5]  M. Kolczak,et al.  Community-wide effects of permethrin-treated bed nets on child mortality and malaria morbidity in western Kenya. , 2003, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[6]  A. Kroeger,et al.  Prevention of the transmission of Chagas' disease with pyrethroid-impregnated materials. , 2003, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[7]  Pedersen Em,et al.  Impact of insecticide-treated materials on filaria transmission by the various species of vector mosquito in Africa. , 2002 .

[8]  A. Kroeger,et al.  Insecticide impregnated curtains to control domestic transmission of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Venezuela: cluster randomised trial , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Kenneth F Schulz,et al.  Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering , 2002, The Lancet.

[10]  F. Tinquaut,et al.  ColoNav: patient navigation for colorectal cancer screening in deprived areas. Study protocol , 1999 .

[11]  B. Kay,et al.  Aedes aegypti survival and dispersal estimated by mark-release-recapture in northern Australia. , 1998, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[12]  P Reiter,et al.  Short report: dispersal of Aedes aegypti in an urban area after blood feeding as demonstrated by rubidium-marked eggs. , 1995, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[13]  P J Diggle,et al.  Second-order analysis of spatial clustering for inhomogeneous populations. , 1991, Biometrics.

[14]  Nathan Mb,et al.  Aedes aegypti infestation characteristics in several Caribbean countries and implications for integrated community-based control. , 1991 .

[15]  D. Gubler,et al.  Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever in the Americas. , 1987, Puerto Rico health sciences journal.

[16]  London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , 1938, Nature.

[17]  Peter A Ryan,et al.  Elimination of dengue by community programs using Mesocyclops(Copepoda) against Aedes aegypti in central Vietnam. , 2005, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[18]  L. Lloyd,et al.  Planning social mobilization and communication for dengue fever prevention and control: a step-by-step guide. , 2004 .

[19]  E. M. Pedersen,et al.  Impact of insecticide-treated materials on filaria transmission by the various species of vector mosquito in Africa. , 2002, Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology.

[20]  R. Hayes,et al.  Simple sample size calculation for cluster-randomized trials. , 1999, International journal of epidemiology.

[21]  A. Knudsen,et al.  Aedes aegypti infestation characteristics in several Caribbean countries and implications for integrated community-based control. , 1991, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.