III-posed and well-posed problems in systems identification

Impulse response identification almost always leads to an ill-posed mathematical problem. This fact is the basis for the well-known numerical difficulties of identification by means of the impulse response. The theory of regularizable ill-posed problems furnishes a unifying point of view for several specific methods of impulse response identification. In this paper we introduce a class of input/output representations, which we call λ-representations, for linear, time-invariant systems. For many cases of practical interest the identification of one of these representations is mathematically well-posed. Its determination is thus relatively insensitive to certain experimental uncertainties, and rational error-in-identification bounds may be found, so that λ-identification is often an attractive alternative to impulse response identification in the nonparametric modeling of physical systems which must be identified from input/ output records. We investigate the effects of input and output uncertainties (noise) on λ-identification, and discuss the problem of finding minimal realizations from these representations. We illustrate the work with an example of electromagnetic pulse (EMP) threat prediction using experimental data. Hard error bounds are provided on the predicted threat. For this problem, the appropriate λ-representation turns out to be the ramp response.

[1]  A. Tikhonov On the stability of inverse problems , 1943 .

[2]  David L. Phillips,et al.  A Technique for the Numerical Solution of Certain Integral Equations of the First Kind , 1962, JACM.

[3]  A. N. Tikhonov,et al.  REGULARIZATION OF INCORRECTLY POSED PROBLEMS , 1963 .

[4]  S. Twomey,et al.  On the Numerical Solution of Fredholm Integral Equations of the First Kind by the Inversion of the Linear System Produced by Quadrature , 1963, JACM.

[5]  H. C. Hsieh,et al.  The Least Squares Estimation of Linear and Nonlinear System Weighting Function Matrices , 1964, Inf. Control..

[6]  Β. L. HO,et al.  Editorial: Effective construction of linear state-variable models from input/output functions , 1966 .

[7]  E. Kennaugh,et al.  Transient and impulse response approximations , 1965 .

[8]  A. Tether Construction of minimal linear state-variable models from finite input-output data , 1970 .

[9]  G. Backus,et al.  Uniqueness in the inversion of inaccurate gross Earth data , 1970, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[10]  Karl Johan Åström,et al.  BOOK REVIEW SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION , 1994, Econometric Theory.

[11]  J. Rissanen Recursive identification of linear systems , 1971 .

[12]  L. Silverman Realization of linear dynamical systems , 1971 .

[13]  J. Cullum Numerical Differentiation and Regularization , 1971 .

[14]  W. Root On the structure of a class of system identification problems , 1971 .

[15]  Valentin F. Turchin,et al.  The use of mathematical-statistics methods in the solution of incorrectly posed problems , 1971 .

[16]  B. Hunt Deconvolution of linear systems by constrained regression and its relationship to the Wiener theory , 1972 .

[17]  E. Mosca Determination of Volterra kernels from input-output data , 1972 .

[18]  K. Furuta,et al.  Identification of weighting function using deterministic input , 1972 .

[19]  W. Rugh,et al.  On the H -matrix system representation , 1972, CDC 1972.

[20]  B. Dickinson,et al.  A minimal realization algorithm for matrix sequences , 1973, CDC 1973.