A Novel Implementation of Magnetic Levitation to Quantify Leukocyte Size, Morphology, and Magnetic Properties to Identify Patients With Sepsis

Background: We have developed a novel, easily implementable methodology using magnetic levitation to quantify circulating leukocyte size, morphology, and magnetic properties, which may help in rapid, bedside screening for sepsis. Objective: Our objectives were to describe our methodological approach to leukocyte assessment, and to perform a pilot investigation to test the ability of magnetic levitation to identify and quantify changes in leukocyte size, shape, density, and/or paramagnetic properties in healthy controls and septic patients. Methods: This prospective, observational cohort study was performed in a 56,000/y visit emergency department (ED) and affiliated outpatient phlebotomy laboratory. Inclusion criteria were admittance to the hospital with suspected or confirmed infection for the septic group, and we enrolled the controls from ED/outpatient patients without infection or acute illness. The bench-top experiments were performed using magnetic levitation to visualize the leukocytes. We primary sought to compare septic patients with noninfected controls and secondary to assess the association with sepsis severity. Our covariates were area, length, width, roundness, and standard deviation (SD) of levitation height. We used unpaired t test and area under the curve (AUC) for the assessment of accuracy in distinguishing between septic and control patients. Results: We enrolled 39 noninfected controls and 22 septic patients. Our analyses of septic patients compared with controls showed: mean cell area in pixels (px) 562 ± 111 vs. 410 ± 45, P < 0.0001, AUC = 0.89 (0.80–0.98); length (px), 29 ± 2.5 vs. 25 ± 1.9, P < 0.0001, AUC = 0.90 (0.83–0.98); and width (px), 27 ± 2.4 vs. 23 ± 1.5, P < 0.0001, AUC = 0.92 (0.84–0.99). Cell roundness: 2.1 ± 1.0 vs. 2.2 ± 1.2, P = 0.8, AUC = 0.51. SD of the levitation height (px) was 72 ± 25 vs. 47 ± 16, P < 0.001, AUC = 0.80 (0.67–0.93). Conclusions: Septic patients had circulating leukocytes with especially increased size parameters, which distinguished sepsis from noninfected patients with promising high accuracy. This portal-device compatible technology shows promise as a potential bedside diagnostic.

[1]  Ofer Mazor,et al.  Detection of membrane-bound and soluble antigens by magnetic levitation. , 2017, Lab on a chip.

[2]  Ofer Mazor,et al.  Detection and quantification of subtle changes in red blood cell density using a cell phone. , 2016, Lab on a chip.

[3]  G. Molema,et al.  Analyzing Neutrophil Morphology, Mechanics, and Motility in Sepsis: Options and Challenges for Novel Bedside Technologies , 2016, Critical care medicine.

[4]  S. Tasoglu,et al.  Smart-Phone Based Magnetic Levitation for Measuring Densities , 2015, PloS one.

[5]  Savas Tasoglu,et al.  Levitational Image Cytometry with Temporal Resolution , 2015, Advanced materials.

[6]  W. Nauseef,et al.  Neutrophils at work , 2014, Nature Immunology.

[7]  D. Remick,et al.  Pathophysiologic mechanisms in septic shock , 2014, Laboratory Investigation.

[8]  Yoko Tabe,et al.  Neutrophil cell death in response to infection and its relation to coagulation , 2013, Journal of Intensive Care.

[9]  A-Jin Lee,et al.  Mean cell volumes of neutrophils and monocytes are promising markers of sepsis in elderly patients , 2013, Blood research.

[10]  P. Kubes,et al.  Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inflammation , 2013, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[11]  T. Orlikowsky,et al.  Flow Cytometry in the Detection of Neonatal Sepsis , 2013, International journal of pediatrics.

[12]  N. Le Meur,et al.  Toward new insights on the white blood cell differential by flow cytometry: A proof of concept study on the sepsis model , 2012, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[13]  G. Demirel,et al.  Automated determination of neutrophil VCS parameters in diagnosis and treatment efficacy of neonatal sepsis , 2012, Pediatric Research.

[14]  F. Venet,et al.  Clinical review: flow cytometry perspectives in the ICU - from diagnosis of infection to monitoring of injury-induced immune dysfunctions , 2011, Critical care.

[15]  H. Haeberle,et al.  Mechanisms of leukocyte distribution during sepsis: an experimental study on the interdependence of cell activation, shear stress and endothelial injury , 2010, Critical care.

[16]  Thierry Fest,et al.  Refining the white blood cell differential: The first flow cytometry routine application , 2010, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[17]  R. Lobmann,et al.  Mean cell volume of neutrophils and monocytes compared with C‐reactive protein, interleukin‐6 and white blood cell count for prediction of sepsis and nonsystemic bacterial infections , 2009, International journal of laboratory hematology.

[18]  Derek C. Angus,et al.  National estimates of severe sepsis in United States emergency departments , 2007, Critical care medicine.

[19]  A. Zychlinsky,et al.  Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Kill Bacteria , 2004, Science.

[20]  A. Zychlinsky,et al.  How do neutrophils and pathogens interact? , 2004, Current opinion in microbiology.

[21]  Mitchell M. Levy,et al.  2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference , 2003, Intensive Care Medicine.

[22]  G. Clermont,et al.  Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[23]  N. Abramson,et al.  Leukocytosis: basics of clinical assessment. , 2000, American family physician.

[24]  P. Ward,et al.  Chemotactic factor influences on the aggregation, swelling, and foreign surface adhesiveness of human leukocytes. , 1978, The American journal of pathology.

[25]  R. Muir Histology of the Blood, Normal and Pathological , 1900, Edinburgh Medical Journal.