Evaluating State-Level Differences in E-cigarette and Cigarette Use Among Adults in the United States Between 2012 and 2014: Findings From the National Adult Tobacco Survey

Objective To examine the association between state-level tobacco control measures and current use estimates of both e-cigarettes and cigarettes, while accounting for socio-demographic correlates. Methods Using the 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 National Adult Tobacco Survey (NATS), we assessed prevalence estimates of US adults' e-cigarette and cigarette current use. Four state groups were created based on the combined state-specific prevalence of both products: low cigarette/e-cigarette (n = 15), high cigarette/e-cigarette (n = 16), high cigarette/low e-cigarette (n = 11), and low cigarette/high e-cigarette) (n = 9). To evaluate the implementation of state-level tobacco control measures, Tobacco Control Index (TCI) was calculated using the State of Tobacco Control annual reports for 2012 and 2013. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to examine differences among the four groups on socio-demographic factors and TCI. Low cigarette/e-cigarette group was used as the referent group. Results Current use estimates of each product varied substantially by state; current e-cigarette use was highest in Oklahoma (10.3%) and lowest in Delaware (2.7%), and current cigarette use was highest in West Virginia (26.1%), and lowest in Vermont (12.6%). Compared to low cigarette/e-cigarette, all other US-state categories had significantly lower TCI scores (high cigarette/e-cigarette: adjusted Relative Risk Ratio [aRRR] = 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-0.61, high cigarette/low e-cigarette: aRRR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.73-0.74, and low cigarette/high e-cigarette: aRRR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.71-073). Conclusions Enforcing existing tobacco control measures likely interacts with e-cigarette use despite being cigarette-focused. Continuing to monitor e-cigarette use is critical to establish baseline use and evaluate future e-cigarette specific federal and state-level tobacco regulatory actions while accounting for the existing tobacco control environment. Implications This study investigates state-level current use estimates of e-cigarettes and cigarettes among US adults; and their association with four existing tobacco control measures. The overall score of these measures was negatively associated with state-level current use estimates such that states with low current e-cigarette and cigarette use had the highest mean overall score. This study assesses the potential relationship between existing state-level tobacco control measures and e-cigarette use and calls for improving the enforcement of the known-to-work tobacco control measures across all US states, while developing evidence-based regulations and interventions specific to e-cigarettes within the existing US tobacco use environment.

[1]  Laura A. Gibson,et al.  Association Between Initial Use of e-Cigarettes and Subsequent Cigarette Smoking Among Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2017, JAMA pediatrics.

[2]  Adam M. Lippert Temporal Changes in the Correlates of U.S. Adolescent Electronic Cigarette Use and Utilization in Tobacco Cessation, 2011 to 2013 , 2017, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[3]  E. Coups,et al.  Association Between Electronic Cigarette Marketing Near Schools and E-cigarette Use Among Youth. , 2016, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[4]  F. Chaloupka,et al.  Prices and E-Cigarette Demand: Evidence From the European Union. , 2016, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[5]  Jennifer B. Unger,et al.  E-Cigarettes and Future Cigarette Use , 2016, Pediatrics.

[6]  K. Ribisl,et al.  RECOMMENDATIONS FOR U.S. PUBLIC POLICIES REGULATING ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES. , 2016, Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management].

[7]  A. Mainous,et al.  Health Considerations in Regulation and Taxation of Electronic Cigarettes , 2015, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[8]  Jonathan D Klein,et al.  Trends in Electronic Cigarette Use Among U.S. Adults: Use is Increasing in Both Smokers and Nonsmokers. , 2015, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[9]  K. Voigt Smoking Norms and the Regulation of E-Cigarettes. , 2015, American journal of public health.

[10]  G. Gore,et al.  Regulation profiles of e-cigarettes in the United States: a critical review with qualitative synthesis , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[11]  L. Haddad,et al.  Waterpipe Smoking and Regulation in the United States: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature , 2015, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[12]  M. Kegler,et al.  Perceived Harm, Addictiveness, and Social Acceptability of Tobacco Products and Marijuana Among Young Adults: Marijuana, Hookah, and Electronic Cigarettes Win , 2015, Substance use & misuse.

[13]  C. Pisinger Why public health people are more worried than excited over e-cigarettes , 2014, BMC Medicine.

[14]  R. McMillen Susceptibility to Electronic Cigarette Use Among Current Nonsmokers , 2014 .

[15]  Stanton A Glantz,et al.  Electronic cigarettes and conventional cigarette use among U.S. adolescents: a cross-sectional study. , 2014, JAMA pediatrics.

[16]  Brian A. King,et al.  Tobacco Product Use Among Adults — United States, 2012–2013 , 2014, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[17]  Anthony Gamst,et al.  Four hundred and sixty brands of e-cigarettes and counting: implications for product regulation , 2014, Tobacco Control.

[18]  F. Chaloupka,et al.  A baseline understanding of state laws governing e-cigarettes , 2014, Tobacco Control.

[19]  Stanton A. Glantz,et al.  E-Cigarettes , 2014, Circulation.

[20]  Annice E Kim,et al.  Multiple tobacco product use among adults in the United States: cigarettes, cigars, electronic cigarettes, hookah, smokeless tobacco, and snus. , 2014, Preventive medicine.

[21]  F. Chaloupka,et al.  The impact of price and tobacco control policies on the demand for electronic nicotine delivery systems , 2014, Tobacco Control.

[22]  Michael S Orr,et al.  Electronic cigarettes in the USA: a summary of available toxicology data and suggestions for the future , 2014, Tobacco Control.

[23]  M. Drummond,et al.  Electronic cigarettes. Potential harms and benefits. , 2014, Annals of the American Thoracic Society.

[24]  Kelvin Choi,et al.  Beliefs and experimentation with electronic cigarettes: a prospective analysis among young adults. , 2014, American journal of preventive medicine.

[25]  A. Templeton,et al.  Are we overusing IVF? , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  Marisa de Andrade,et al.  Promotion of electronic cigarettes: tobacco marketing reinvented? , 2013, BMJ.

[27]  Jessica K Pepper,et al.  Electronic nicotine delivery system (electronic cigarette) awareness, use, reactions and beliefs: a systematic review , 2013, Tobacco Control.

[28]  Ho‐Sang Shin,et al.  Measurement of Aldehydes in Replacement Liquids of Electronic Cigarettes by Headspace Gas Chromatography-mass Spectrometry , 2013 .

[29]  N. Benowitz,et al.  The regulatory challenge of electronic cigarettes. , 2013, JAMA.

[30]  Ho‐Sang Shin,et al.  Determination of tobacco-specific nitrosamines in replacement liquids of electronic cigarettes by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. , 2013, Journal of chromatography. A.

[31]  K. Farsalinos,et al.  Cytotoxicity evaluation of electronic cigarette vapor extract on cultured mammalian fibroblasts (ClearStream-LIFE): comparison with tobacco cigarette smoke extract , 2013, Inhalation toxicology.

[32]  Andrzej Sobczak,et al.  Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes , 2013, Tobacco Control.

[33]  Ii-Lun Chen,et al.  FDA summary of adverse events on electronic cigarettes. , 2013, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[34]  E. Hahn,et al.  E-cigarettes: promise or peril? , 2012, The Nursing clinics of North America.

[35]  A. Jemal,et al.  Changes in smoking prevalence among U.S. adults by state and region: Estimates from the Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey, 1992-2007 , 2011, BMC public health.

[36]  J. Brooks-Gunn,et al.  Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing , 2010, The Future of children.

[37]  T. Eissenberg,et al.  A Clinical Laboratory Model for Evaluating the Acute Effects of Electronic “Cigarettes”: Nicotine Delivery Profile and Cardiovascular and Subjective Effects , 2010, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[38]  A. Jemal,et al.  Tobacco Control in the United States—Recent Progress And Opportunities , 2009, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[39]  Xiao-Cheng Wu,et al.  Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975–2005, Featuring Trends in Lung Cancer, Tobacco Use, and Tobacco Control , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[40]  R. West Tobacco control: present and future. , 2006, British medical bulletin.

[41]  A. Jemal,et al.  Lung cancer trends in young adults: an early indicator of progress in tobacco control (United States) , 2003, Cancer Causes & Control.

[42]  Stephen J. Conroy,et al.  Reciprocity in parent-child relations over the adult life course. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[43]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .