Hierarchical structure in a self-created communication system: Building nominal constituents in homesign

Deaf children whose hearing losses are so severe that they cannot acquire spoken language and whose hearing parents have not exposed them to sign language nevertheless use gestures, called homesigns , to communicate. Homesigners have been shown to refer to entities by pointing at that entity (a demonstrative, that). They also use iconic gestures and category points that refer, not to a particular entity, but to its class (a noun, bird). We used longitudinal data from a homesigner called David to test the hypothesis that these different types of gestures are combined to form larger, multigesture nominal constituents (that bird). We verified this hypothesis by showing that David’s multigesture combinations served the same semantic and syntactic functions as demonstrative gestures or noun gestures used on their own. In other words, the larger unit substituted for the smaller units and, in this way, functioned as a nominal constituent. Children are thus able to refer to entities using multigesture units that contain both nouns and demonstratives, even when they do not have a conventional language to provide a model for this type of hierarchical constituent structure.

[1]  E. Newport,et al.  Out of the hands of babes: On a possible sign advantage in language acquisition , 1990 .

[2]  Jill P. Morford,et al.  From here and now to there and then: the development of displaced reference in homesign and English. , 1997, Child development.

[3]  S Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Gestural communication in deaf children: the effects and noneffects of parental input on early language development. , 1984, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[4]  Philippe Maurer,et al.  Order of demonstrative and noun , 2013 .

[5]  Eric Wanner,et al.  Language acquisition: the state of the art , 1982 .

[6]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  What language creation in the manual modality tells us about the foundations of language , 2005 .

[7]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Negation, questions, and structure building in a homesign system , 2011, Cognition.

[8]  S Goldin-Meadow,et al.  The development of language-like communication without a language model. , 1977, Science.

[9]  J. Lyons,et al.  Natural language and universal grammar , 1993 .

[10]  Jerrold M. Sadock,et al.  Pragmatics and autolexical grammar : in honor of Jerry Sadock , 2011 .

[11]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  How children make language out of gesture: Morphological structure in gesture systems developed by American and Chinese deaf children , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Sandra R. Waxman,et al.  A Cross-Linguistic Examination of the Noun-Category Bias: Its Existence and Specificity in French- and Spanish-Speaking Preschool-Aged Children , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  Ceil Lucas,et al.  Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues , 1990 .

[14]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Silence is liberating: removing the handcuffs on grammatical expression in the manual modality. , 1996 .

[15]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Displaced communication in a self-styled gesture system: Pointing at the nonpresent ☆ , 1991 .

[16]  William H. Edmondson,et al.  International review of sign linguistics , 1989 .

[17]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Spontaneous sign systems created by deaf children in two cultures , 1998, Nature.

[18]  C. Butcher,et al.  Nouns and Verbs in A Self-Styled Gesture System: What′s in A Name? , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  J. Quer Signs of the time: selected papers from TISLR 8 , 2008 .

[20]  K. Emmorey Language, Cognition, and the Brain: Insights From Sign Language Research , 2001 .

[21]  M. Tomasello The item-based nature of children’s early syntactic development , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  D. McNeill Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought , 1992 .

[23]  Marie Coppola,et al.  Grammatical Subjects in home sign: Abstract linguistic structure in adult primary gesture systems without linguistic input. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Michael Strong,et al.  Language Learning and Deafness , 1988 .

[25]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Hearing Gesture: How Our Hands Help Us Think , 2003 .

[26]  David Gil,et al.  The World Atlas of Language Structures , 2005 .

[27]  eljko Bokovi,et al.  Topicalization, Focalization, Lexical Insertion, and Scrambling , 2004, Linguistic Inquiry.

[28]  Marie Coppola,et al.  Sign Languages: Deixis in an emerging sign language , 2010 .

[29]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Once Is Not Enough: Standards of Well-Formedness in Manual Communication Created over Three Different Timespans. , 1993 .

[30]  Željko Bošković,et al.  Topicalization, Focalization, Lexical Insertion, and Scrambling , 2004 .

[31]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition , 2005 .

[32]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  When does a system become phonological? Handshape production in gesturers, signers, and homesigners , 2011, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory.

[33]  Bencie Woll,et al.  Sign Language: The Study of Deaf People and their Language , 1985 .

[34]  William Snyder,et al.  Child Language: The Parametric Approach , 2007 .

[35]  Annette Karmiloff-Smith,et al.  A Functional Approach to Child Language: A Study of Determiners and Reference , 1979 .

[36]  J. Pine,et al.  Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[37]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  The resilience of combinatorial structure at the word level: morphology in self-styled gesture systems , 1995, Cognition.

[38]  David Lebeaux,et al.  Language acquisition and the form of the grammar , 2000 .

[39]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Gestural communication in deaf children: noneffect of parental input on language development. , 1983, Science.

[40]  Virginia Valian Syntactic categories in the speech of young children. , 1986 .

[41]  M. Tomasello First Steps toward a Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition , 2001 .

[42]  S. Goldin‐Meadow The Resilience of Language : What Gesture Creation in Deaf Children Can Tell Us About How All Children Learn Language , 2005 .

[43]  M. Tomasello Beyond formalities: The case of language acquisition , 2005 .

[44]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Expressing generic concepts with and without a language model , 2005, Cognition.

[45]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  The learnability of abstract syntactic principles , 2011, Cognition.

[46]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Subject-auxiliary inversion: A natural category , 2005 .

[47]  Steven Abney,et al.  The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect , 1972 .

[48]  Harlan Lane,et al.  Recent perspectives on American sign language , 1980 .

[49]  G. Pullum,et al.  The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language , 2002 .