Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams

We argue that the debate regarding the performance implications of demographic diversity can be usefully reframed in terms of the network variables that reflect distinct forms of social capital. Scholars who are pessimistic about the performance of diverse teams base their view on the hypothesis that decreased network density--the average strength of the relationship among team members--lowers a team's capacity for coordination. The optimistic view is founded on the hypothesis that teams that are characterized by high network heterogeneity, whereby relationships on the team cut across salient demographic boundaries, enjoy an enhanced learning capability. We test each of these hypotheses directly and thereby avoid the problematic assumption that they contradict one another. Our analysis of data on the social networks, organizational tenure, and productivity of 224 corporate R&D teams indicates that both network variables help account for team productivity. These findings support a recasting of the diversity-performance debate in terms of the network processes that are more proximate to outcomes of interest.

[1]  W. S. Robinson.  Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. , 1950, International journal of epidemiology.

[2]  H. Leavitt.  Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[3]  G. Simmel,et al.  Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations , 1955 .

[4]  M. Kendall,et al.  The advanced theory of statistics , 1945 .

[5]  N. Ryder.  The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. , 1965, American sociological review.

[6]  Stephen I. Cohen,et al.  Information Flow in Research and Development Laboratories. , 1969 .

[7]  Edgar F. Borgatta,et al.  Sociological Methodology, 1969. , 1969 .

[8]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Correlational bias in observer ratings. , 1976 .

[10]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  An examination of need-satisfaction models of job attitudes. , 1977 .

[11]  M. Hannan,et al.  Estimation in Panel Models: Results in Pooling Cross-Sections and Time Series , 1977 .

[12]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  Managing the flow of technology: technology transfer and the dissemination of technological informat , 1977 .

[13]  P. Allison.  Measures of Inequality , 1978 .

[14]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Technical Communication in R & D Laboratories: The Impact of Project Work Characteristics , 1978 .

[15]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[16]  W. W. Muir,et al.  Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity , 1980 .

[17]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  The consequences of turnover , 1980 .

[18]  H. Tajfel.  Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[19]  H. J. Arnold,et al.  Social desirability response bias in self-report choice situations. , 1981 .

[20]  R. Katz.  The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance. , 1982 .

[21]  R. Burt.  Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure , 1985 .

[22]  K. Cook,et al.  The Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks: Theory and Experimental Results , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The effects of departmental demography on turnover: The case of a university. , 1983 .

[24]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Measuring Tie Strength , 1984 .

[25]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. , 1984 .

[26]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational Demography: Implications for Management , 1985 .

[27]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  Raymond W. Smilor,et al.  The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship , 1986 .

[29]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[30]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Entrepreneurship Through Social Networks , 1986 .

[31]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .

[33]  S. Jackson,et al.  Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? , 1989 .

[34]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication , 1989 .

[35]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[36]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Measuring age as a structural concept , 1991 .

[37]  Yehouda Shenhav,et al.  Expected Managerial Careers within Growing and Declining R&D Establishments , 1991 .

[38]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[39]  F. Yammarino,et al.  Identifying Common Methods Variance With Data Collected From A Single Source: An Unresolved Sticky Issue , 1991 .

[40]  C. R. Evans,et al.  Group Cohesion and Performance , 1991 .

[41]  B. Cohen,et al.  Status processes in enduring work groups. , 1991 .

[42]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[43]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[44]  A. Portes,et al.  Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[45]  Robin J. Ely,et al.  The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. , 1994 .

[46]  F. Kianifard.  Applied Multivariate Data Analysis: Volume II: Categorical and Multivariate Methods , 1994 .

[47]  L. H. Pelled.  Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory , 1996 .

[48]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[49]  B. Lawrence.  The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[50]  C. M. Riordan,et al.  Demographic diversity and employee attitudes : An empirical examination of relational demography within work units , 1997 .

[51]  Barbara S. Lawrence,et al.  Perspective---The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[52]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  How management teams can have a good fight. , 2009, Harvard business review.

[53]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Organizational demography and culture: Insights from a formal model and simulation. , 1998 .

[54]  William H. Glick,et al.  Common Methods Bias: Does Common Methods Variance Really Bias Results? , 1998 .

[55]  A. Portes.  Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[56]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Social Capital and Opportunity in Corporate R&D: The Contingent Effect of Contact Density on Mobility Expectations , 1998 .

[57]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[58]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[59]  B. Erickson,et al.  Corporate Social Capital and Liability , 2002 .

[60]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relations and Networks Benefit Firms Seeking Financing , 1999, The New Economic Sociology.

[61]  R. Leenders,et al.  CSC: The Structure of Advantage and Disadvantage , 1999 .

[62]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly , 2009 .

[63]  Jesper B. Sørensen.  The Longitudinal Effects of Group Tenure Composition on Turnover , 2000, American Sociological Review.

[64]  Jesper B. Sørensen.  The Use and Misuse of the Coefficient of Variation in Organizational Demography Research , 2002 .